Jump to content

Terrorism


aimaad22
 Share

Recommended Posts

That's a fair enough comment which I don't think anyone was disputing. It was just a response to your response to Rayvin. The point is that you'd probably have to curtail personal freedoms to a far greater extent to completely rule out the possibility of something like this (probably beyond the range of what is currently even possible, even if you wanted to do it). I think that was Rayvin's point.

 

i doubt even with a massive crackdown on civil liberties could prevent the kind of thing we saw yesterday from occurring again. it's an ongoing threat that is unfortunately something we have to live with today but the risk seems small, thanks in main to the job the security agencies are doing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it interesting that he was 52 - perceived wisdom is that first/second generation Muslims are more integrated and its disaffected younger people that are more prone to radicalisation. It looks like he was generally a thug which might be a factor - being naturally violent might have made him more prone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do they really consider us friends?

 

I don't think they consider us assets. Maybe you could argue somewhere between the two.

Edited by Rayvin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.