catmag 337 Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Couldn't face going to the vets. Sent MrsP instead. Cats will be back tonight. They'll be absolutely fine. They'll look like they're pissed for a while with the combination of anaesthetic and lampshades (which is hilarious in itself) but they'll be right as rain in no time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catmag 337 Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Oh, and you're a fanny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJ 0 Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Just like the man himself. Again, I agree and I've said that already in this thread. But I'll take the guy with no substance standing up for the important issues affecting real people than the guy with no substance standing up for a corrupt multi-national financial service. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 17263 Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Russell wins! http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/dec/18/us-investors-set-sell-new-era-estate-london-protests-westbrook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 17263 Posted December 19, 2014 Share Posted December 19, 2014 Depends on what you think the purpose of the protest was. I've no doubt you're right, but if the people remain in their homes at an affordable rent I'd imagine they won't be thinking to much about what profit the management company make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 (edited) The Mockingjay. Edited December 20, 2014 by Park Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44882 Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 David Lynch Foundation backdrop there, Parky. Your great hero seems quite taken with Mr. Brand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 David Lynch Foundation backdrop there, Parky. Your great hero seems quite taken with Mr. Brand. You sneaky fuck! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44882 Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 In fact, here you go. Here he is seconds after that photo was taken with Lynch, and they seem to be getting on swimmingly towards the end of the video. I look forward to you moderating your opinion of Brand forthwith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21924 Posted April 21, 2015 Author Share Posted April 21, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44882 Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Good stuff from yogi Brand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 6587 Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 I havent watched that yet but I really wish people would stop responding to Katie Hopkins. She'd soon disappear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44882 Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 Agreed. But it's never gonna happen, and as long as she generates headlines, she'll keep her column at the Sun and keep getting dragged out on This Morning etc. She's awful though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21924 Posted April 22, 2015 Author Share Posted April 22, 2015 she genuinely does believe what she says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21924 Posted April 22, 2015 Author Share Posted April 22, 2015 she a troll sure, but i don't think she was joking when she called migrants cockroaches that should or crushed, or shot. so brand did well to point out to the world that the despicable bitch got what she wanted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 I think giving time to her opinions is a mistake. In her world, there the points he makes won't land anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10857 Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 she genuinely does believe what she says. She may believe a version of what she says, but I believe in reality it's a much less extreme version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4386 Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 Well if she was so keen to walk in the shoes of fat people, we could always dump her in north Africa with no support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2207 Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 She's the female equivalent of Alf Garnett. I'm amazed she can earn a living from this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 33222 Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 A newspaper paid her to write this and decided to publish her bollocks. Well I say newspaper, it was The Sun, but still. They're as culpable as her IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10857 Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 When does her attention whoreing become incitement though? That line about gunning the refugees is the closest she's come so far, isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21924 Posted April 23, 2015 Author Share Posted April 23, 2015 freedom of speech ends when it threatens someone else's freedom. she wouldn't sound out of place in nazi germany. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 33222 Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 freedom of speech ends when it threatens someone else's freedom. she wouldn't sound out of place on a Paris Metro train going to a CL match with the rest of her mates. FYP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 17263 Posted April 28, 2015 Share Posted April 28, 2015 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/generalelection/general-election-2015-ed-miliband-says-he-profoundly-disagrees-with-russell-brand-10209963.html Not entirely sure who this benefits most Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44882 Posted April 28, 2015 Share Posted April 28, 2015 Interesting. I get the no point in voting argument, but I was listening to a podcast with Billy Bragg on it recently, where they got onto the topic of Brand. Anyway Bragg says he agrees with most of what Brand says, but he cannot agree with this voting thing. He was saying that there is so much going on in this upcoming election that to not engage would be a big mistake - so for instance, he raised the possibility of there being a second election this year and the impact that the result of the first election could have on the second. If the Greens take a higher than expected share of the popular vote, that might encourage more people to vote for them in the second election, but you lose all of that repeat engagement if you don't get it in the first election. Also, if the youth just disengage from politics and then do nothing else, then politicians will also disengage and just ignore them. Anyway I'm butchering his point a bit, and he had more to say than just that, but aye, I can't remember what my point was. I'm just gonna hit send. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now