Jump to content

The Cricket Thread


McFaul
 Share

Do you like cricket?  

105 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Ah right, that makes sense. The Oval always used to take spin anyway, but that might have been cos they always used to play the final test of each home series there, so it was always late summer. I remember Tufnell taking a hatful there against Australia in 97, the same series where Hussain scored a double hundred in the first test. That was a brilliant series, even though England got howked in the middle 3 tests - the standard of cricket was higher then I reckon.

Aye, he bowled the Windies out at the Oval a few years before that too (when they were class as well).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes he had a few match winning performances through the 90s didn't he. He was a quality bowler on his day. I read his autobiography on holiday about 15 years ago and thought he came across as a sound enough bloke but whenever I've seen him on telly more recently he comes across as a bit of a wanker. He's good on TMS though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Winning any test match against that Aussie team was an achievement. The 97 vintage was immense.

 

I credit Hussain and Fletcher for laying the foundations for the 2005 ashes win. He was an ugly batsman but a good captain and made us competitive again.

 

Yes those two definitely tried to change the culture at the time. The 90s - early 2000s Aussie teams must be up there with the best sports teams of all time, 2001 Ashes team was better than 97 I reckon due to Gilchrist, Hayden, more mature Gillespie. Their rugby league team of the same era was also incredible as it happens, but being an international RL team they'll never be revered as a truly great international sports team cos the competition from other countries is so limited. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes he had a few match winning performances through the 90s didn't he. He was a quality bowler on his day. I read his autobiography on holiday about 15 years ago and thought he came across as a sound enough bloke but whenever I've seen him on telly more recently he comes across as a bit of a wanker. He's good on TMS though.

I think he comes across as trying to hard on the telly but seems more laid-back and natural on the radio. Like his Radio 5 show with Michale Vaughan as well. He probably should've played more for England but didn't exactly fit in with the 'cricketing establishment' or, even more so, with Gooch's efforts to raise the fitness levels of the team. Speaking of which, that series against the West Indies I mentioned (early 90s) was class. Gooch's match-winning century in the Headingley test was unbelievable. Without checking, I think he got about 150 out of a team score of 270-ish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes those two definitely tried to change the culture at the time. The 90s - early 2000s Aussie teams must be up there with the best sports teams of all time, 2001 Ashes team was better than 97 I reckon due to Gilchrist, Hayden, more mature Gillespie. Their rugby league team of the same era was also incredible as it happens, but being an international RL team they'll never be revered as a truly great international sports team cos the competition from other countries is so limited. 

 

yes, i think you're right. hayden was an absolute beast. a bully of an opener who would just plant his front foot and knock the stuffing out of most strike bowlers.

 

and gilschrist rewrote the rule book for wicket keepers. every test side looks for a wicket keeper that can counter punch lower down the order now. you don't see so many specialist keepers anymore if their batting leaves a bit to be desired. 

 

it made 2005 all the more satisfying - that we showed they weren't invincible - despite still having two of the best bowlers of all time, and one of the best batsmen of all time in the side (ponting). 

Edited by Dr Gloom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aye it's a shame I think. It means they're going into a tour of the subcontinent without a full time spinner having played a single test this year. I know people are often reluctant to change a winning team and they probably want to give Vince a chance to get a score to his name, but to me it feels like a missed opportunity on a wicket that everybody expects to take spin. Arguably on current form swapping Rashid for Vince wouldn't even be weakening the batting too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

luckily two of our form batsmen are still at the crease. 

 

lots of questions remain going into the winter tour: 

 

who replaces vince? do you continue with moeen as a frontline spinner or does rashid start? can hales make it as an opener? has ballance done to deserve another go when other batsmen are making good cases in county cricket? do you stick with finn or bomb him for wood?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.