Jump to content

The Cricket Thread


McFaul
 Share

Do you like cricket?  

105 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

I’m only watched it on and off when it started to get interesting as wickets were tumbling but it looked to me like Pakistan knew they couldn’t win and threw in the towel, the Woakes delivery opening ball aside, which was a Jaffa that looked like it hit a crack 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Toonpack said:

We need to fill the team with batsmen with "oo" in their name, they seem to be  pretty good ones: Gooch, Cook, Root, Brook.

 

With the proviso that no Mackems or Brummies ever be allowed in the commentary booth.

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Meenzer said:

 

With the proviso that no Mackems or Brummies ever be allowed in the commentary booth.

 

Aye, Gewch, Cewk, Rewt and Brewk just wouldn't cut it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Kid Dynamite said:

Stokes not in great form with the bat atm. Just looking at his recent games for club and country and he's not scored higher than 2 in 50% of his last 16 innings.

He hasn't played for months, so perhaps not surprising that he fails in Pakistan.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pitch is a bit of a pisstake mind. Recycled from the previous match which is pretty unprecedented. Then heavily watered and then dried out with industrial dryers. I know-same for both teams. I think they’ll be about 100 runs short. As you could see wickets falling in a heap 

Edited by Alex
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said:

another two failures from HowZak

He averages about 32/33 in first class cricket. He’s arguably over performing as his average is the same in tests. But they want two openers to come in and smash it around. I’ve never really agreed with it but when it comes off it’s spectacular. Dan Lawrence has a significantly poorer test record and he seems to be the closest to fitting the bill as an alternative 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Alex said:

Pitch is a bit of a pisstake mind. Recycled from the previous match which is pretty unprecedented. Then heavily watered and then dried out with industrial dryers. I know-same for both teams. I think they’ll be about 100 runs short. As you could see wickets falling in a heap 

Can see there being "problems" with Rawalpindi next week, so they need to play the third test on the same pitch. :) 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RobinRobin said:

Can see there being "problems" with Rawalpindi next week, so they need to play the third test on the same pitch. :) 

Nah, I think the industrial dryers are already en route 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't particularly have a problem with the pitch selection tbh, home teams perogative (and they all set it up to home advantage) I do think though that the toss is outmoded and, to counter pitch doctoring advantage, the visiting team should get the choice bat/bowl as default.

 

It also helps if you catch the fucking ball.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

India getting a pasting off the Kiwis, current NZ not out batsmen Ravindra (has scored a ton) and Patel 😳😂

Edited by Toonpack
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Toonpack said:

I don't particularly have a problem with the pitch selection tbh, home teams perogative (and they all set it up to home advantage) I do think though that the toss is outmoded and, to counter pitch doctoring advantage, the visiting team should get the choice bat/bowl as default.

 

It also helps if you catch the fucking ball.

I would definitely only have the coin toss for the first match in a series. Then you should alternate afterwards for which captain has the option to bat or bowl 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Alex said:

I would definitely only have the coin toss for the first match in a series. Then you should alternate afterwards for which captain has the option to bat or bowl 

Exactly 👍 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17/10/2024 at 15:45, Alex said:

He averages about 32/33 in first class cricket. He’s arguably over performing as his average is the same in tests. But they want two openers to come in and smash it around. I’ve never really agreed with it but when it comes off it’s spectacular. Dan Lawrence has a significantly poorer test record and he seems to be the closest to fitting the bill as an alternative 


I’d rather recall Buttler if the remit is just play your shots, it’ll work some days and we’re fine if jt if fails the majority of times and fuck the consequences. It worked for sehwag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dr Gloom said:

I just don’t think how Zak is very good, even in the role where we seemingly has zero responsibility 

You've hidden that opinion well until now. 🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Dr Gloom said:


I’d rather recall Buttler if the remit is just play your shots, it’ll work some days and we’re fine if jt if fails the majority of times and fuck the consequences. It worked for sehwag

That ship has sailed I think, with his role in the ODI set-up and the money he can make from franchise cricket. Not that I disagree with idea. Tbh, I’d have had him as the test wicketkeeper and not have pandered to Bairstow (who should’ve been a specialist batsman or not in the side imo) 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.