Kevin Carr's Gloves 3887 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 Told you something bad had happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 42380 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 How would it disappear from radar then? Isn't that ground based, and independent of the aircraft? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gejon 2 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 How would it disappear from radar then? Isn't that ground based, and independent of the aircraft? Don't planes disappear from radar if they fly below a certain height? Probably bollocks but I am sure I have read that before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 42380 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 I'm not too clued up on current aviation tech, need an expert opinion from Des Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gejon 2 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 Come to think of it there is a very common phrase "Flying below the radar" isn't there? Â Not sure how low it has to be and if a commercial jet could manage it apart from take off and landing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 42380 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 They'd only be able to do it if Nicolas Cage was on the flight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5217 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 Come to think of it there is a very common phrase "Flying below the radar" isn't there? Â Not sure how low it has to be and if a commercial jet could manage it apart from take off and landing. Â Grand Theft Auto supports this assertion I think it's about flying lower than obstructive objects (like mountains and stuff). Not sure if it's applicable on the sea. Â Saying that, radar has a range and this plane was way out at sea wasn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 Spy satellites have pretty much total coverage of the planet if you put all the big players in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desmondTUTU 0 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 the amercans know where this thing is and so do the malaysians looking at their half hearted salvage operation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 the amercans know where this thing is and so do the malaysians looking at their half hearted salvage operation Agree. They need time to cook up a proper story or summink... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desmondTUTU 0 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 People have been going on about some terrorists putting a nuclear bomb on the plane or sumthing. Â They dont have that technology Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken 119 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 The Americans would have a better clue than most, true, but the Malaysians don't even know what fucking day it is! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken 119 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 People have been going on about some terrorists putting a nuclear bomb on the plane or sumthing. Â They dont have that technology Someone who hated the Chinese, who happened to have a knack of knowing how to turn off communication/transponder links, who knew how to fly this airbus for 5 hours before it eventually ran out of petrol, descended and vapourised on impact with the ocean anywhere within a 6000km radius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desmondTUTU 0 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 As long as it doesn't come anywhere near us i'm not too bothered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desmondTUTU 0 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 Someone who hated the Chinese, who happened to have a knack of knowing how to turn off communication/transponder links, who knew how to fly this airbus for 5 hours before it eventually ran out of petrol, descended and vapourised on impact with the ocean anywhere within a 6000km radius. Â A spy of some kind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5217 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 Someone who hated the Chinese, who happened to have a knack of knowing how to turn off communication/transponder links, who knew how to fly this airbus for 5 hours before it eventually ran out of petrol, descended and vapourised on impact with the ocean anywhere within a 6000km radius. Â Thing is, surely they'd go for an actual target, rather than just allowing the plane to go down in some unspecified location. Why not slam it into something? If the terrorists were undisturbed by the passengers during 5 hours of flying off course, I doubt they'd have been interrupted in a repeat of 9/11. Â I don't think it was terrorists. It's not like any group has claimed it either, which defeats the whole point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desmondTUTU 0 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 they have not claimed it because they are still planning somethng else with it? Â perhaps the americans are monitoring it wherever it is to see who is involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5217 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 It's possible I guess, although it would definitely be targeted at the Chinese if it was terrorism. There are a reasonable number of Chinese 'terrorist' groups, but they're all very low tech. This would be a huge step up - although it follows a few days on from that mass stabbing in a train station that (supposedly) was carried out by separatists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desmondTUTU 0 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 sky news now 2 old codgers looking at a big map pointing at where it could have gone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken 119 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 they have not claimed it because they are still planning somethng else with it? Â perhaps the americans are monitoring it wherever it is to see who is involved. So where do you propose they have landed this thing without word getting out? Â It can't land on a makeshift airstrip - gravel or dirt - it would have to be something sunbstantial like say concete or bitume which would only exist in a large urban sprawl in any country of that region. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desmondTUTU 0 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 So where do you propose they have landed this thing without word getting out? Â It can't land on a makeshift airstrip - gravel or dirt - it would have to be something sunbstantial like say concete or bitume which would only exist in a large urban sprawl in any country of that region. Â Im sure there are places but i know what u mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 42380 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 7083 Posted March 15, 2014 Author Share Posted March 15, 2014 Read this elsewhere. Â "A coincidental convoy of employees of a semi-conductor manufacturing firm (Freescale) were on board the missing Malaysia Airlines flight. Here's something to look deeper into: four days after the flight goes missing, a patent is approved by the Patent Office for maximizing dies on a wafer. 4 of the 5 Patent holders are Chinese employees of Freescale Semiconductor of Austin TX. The patent is divided up on 20% increments to 5 holders. Â Peidong Wang, Suzhou, China, (20%) Zhijun Chen, Suzhou, China, (20%) Zhihong Cheng, Suzhou, China, (20%) Li Ying, Suzhou, China, (20%) Freescale Semiconductor (20%) Â If a patent holder dies, then the remaining holders equally share the dividends of the deceased if not disputed in a will. If 4 of the 5 dies, then the remaining 1 Patent holder gets 100% of the wealth of the patent. Â That remaining live Patent holder is Freescale Semiconductor. Â Who owns Freescale Semiconductor ? Blackstone Group LP - Blackstone bought out the mortgage for the WTC building 7 in 2000 Â Here is a potential motive for the missing plane. All 4 Chinese holders of the Patent were passengers on the missing plane. Patent holders can alter the proceeds legally bypassing wealth to their heirs. However, they cannot do so until the Patent is approved. So when the plane went missing, the patent had not been approved. Thus, Freescale gets 100% of Patent once Patent holders are declared deceased." Â What is one of the projects Freescale is working on? Stealth cloaking of aircraft. Â Like Charlie Chan used to say, 'Coincidence is like ancient egg, both have unusual odor.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desmondTUTU 0 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 We could do with freescale semiconductor buying Ashley out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken 119 Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 Definitely think the Chinese were targeted here - individually or collectively. Not sure of the motive or directive, but there were Chinese VIP's on board that flight so the above could hold sway, though I don't know why someone would sacrifice their own life/lives for that reason. Evidence suggests the aircraft changed trajectory ruling out a sudden explosion as a cause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now