Jump to content

Politics


Christmas Tree
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't know but a) I wouldn't trust her/them and B) what's the point of a leader or indeed PLP that don't believe in anything vaguely left wing and have to have if "forced" upon them.

So like him you're not receptive to compromise then? Owen Smith sounds like quite a good middle candidate to me. Eg anti-austerity yet pro trident. The type of person who may have electable policies. Would you support him?

 

For the record, I think you're entirely wrong. The main issue with Corbyn is the man himself, not his policies, although being a closet Brexiter is hardly tenable. He's unelectable as a person, even if he was pushing more moderate policies. He's the wrong man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So like him you're not receptive to compromise then? Owen Smith sounds like quite a good middle candidate to me. Eg anti-austerity yet pro trident. The type of person who may have electable policies. Would you support him?

 

For the record, I think you're entirely wrong. The main issue with Corbyn is the man himself, not his policies, although being a closet Brexiter is hardly tenable. He's unelectable as a person, even if he was pushing more moderate policies. He's the wrong man.

 

I know this is directed at NJS, but I would have been receptive to compromise some time back, before this whole thing became ridiculous. I even would have said that the policies are more important than the individual, which I believe to be true. If Angela Eagle had stood up and set out the exact same policies as Corbyn, I likely would have backed her.

 

But after this shit show and the utter contempt with which the PLP are treating the members, I'm now trying really hard to find myself in a position that isn't 'vote for Corbyn out of spite'. I certainly don't think I can trust Labour again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although you know what, I've just read Owen Smith's speech and he sounds ok. I'll reflect on this more in the build up to the vote. I'd much prefer to vote optimistically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So like him you're not receptive to compromise then? Owen Smith sounds like quite a good middle candidate to me. Eg anti-austerity yet pro trident. The type of person who may have electable policies. Would you support him?

 

For the record, I think you're entirely wrong. The main issue with Corbyn is the man himself, not his policies, although being a closet Brexiter is hardly tenable. He's unelectable as a person, even if he was pushing more moderate policies. He's the wrong man.

Of course I believe in compromise.

 

I keep remembering a Q&A with Blair at the 2005 election where a woman dexcribed herself as a left winger/socialist and asked if he had any policy or reason to persuade her to vote for him - his answer was "sorry, but no".

 

My worry is there are too many who wouldn't adopt anything worthwhile - as I keep arguing and especially as May is going to pursue the one nation myth, if you can't differentiate between Tory and Labour then what's the point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course I believe in compromise.

 

I keep remembering a Q&A with Blair at the 2005 election where a woman dexcribed herself as a left winger/socialist and asked if he had any policy or reason to persuade her to vote for him - his answer was "sorry, but no".

 

My worry is there are too many who wouldn't adopt anything worthwhile - as I keep arguing and especially as May is going to pursue the one nation myth, if you can't differentiate between Tory and Labour then what's the point?

 

The former prime minister said that even if he thought a left-wing programme was the route to victory, he would not adopt one.

 

“[Labour] misunderstand the difference between radical leftism, which is often in fact quite reactionary – and radical social democracy, which is all about ensuring that values are put to work in the most effective way,” he said.

 

“Let me make my position clear: I wouldn’t want to win on an old-fashioned leftist platform. Even if I thought it was the route to victory, I wouldn’t take it.”

 

“Even if you did [win] it wouldn’t be right because it wouldn’t take the country forward, it would take it backwards. That’s why it’s not the right thing to do.”

 

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tony-blair-says-he-wouldn-t-want-a-left-wing-labour-party-to-win-an-election-10406928.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best in your lifetime? :lol:

166 MP's when he took over, 306 when he left.

 

Conservatives strongly moved to the centre ground of British politics.

 

Over 2.5 million new jobs / record employment

 

Turned Britain from the shambles he inherited to best performing economy in the western world.

 

Gay marriage

 

Reduced the deficit by £80 billion

 

Record spending on the NHS

 

Took millions of low paid out of income tax.

 

Etc etc etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming that's all positive CT, do you, as a reasonably fair minded sort of individual, personally think there's been any negatives?..... Do you have any time for the suggestion that there may have been?....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the old wind-up vs. actually being that stupid quadary again.

Tories moved to the centre. What laughable bollocks. Ideological driven austerity that failed.

Job creation is one thing but wages fell sharply whilst zero-hours contracts increased.

Gay marriage is a good thing but simply a natural progression from civil parnterships. Not to mention the speculation Cameron regretted the move.

Also, I think the deficit reduction thing is one of the most pernicious pieces of doublespeak of our age. In actuality the country's debt is much larger than it was when he came to power and it is increasing all the time and the government has pretty had to admit that there's no sign of the much vaunted surplus of payments any time soon (not in this Parliament anyway). So that's actually you listing an absolute abject failure as one of his key successes. :lol: :lol: :lol:

The NHS is in a far worse state than when he inherited it. I don't think anyone who works in it would disagree.

And as for the last one, the last budget made (I may have my figures slightly out) families earning less than £18K a year about two grand worse off.

Etc., etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming that's all positive CT, do you, as a reasonably fair minded sort of individual, personally think there's been any negatives?..... Do you have any time for the suggestion that there may have been?....

I think just about every single political commentator has pointed to his many failures and his modest (in the most sympathetic cases) successes. Being the keen political observer that he is, CT will no doubt concede he's in a minority of one in arguing he's been a great PM. It's almost like he sets out to be contrary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming that's all positive CT, do you, as a reasonably fair minded sort of individual, personally think there's been any negatives?..... Do you have any time for the suggestion that there may have been?....

Of course there's been negatives, but a lot of that in politics is due to the hand you are dealt. Tony Blair inherited a growing economy at a time when the world was doing ok. (Put aside discussions on bubbles etc), Cameron inherited an economy following the crash.

 

Every PM that's ever been would have preferred Blairs circumstances than Cameron's.

 

He was a very modernising leader that changed the party from the "nasty" party, made it electable again and doubled the number of MP's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.