Jump to content

Politics


Christmas Tree
 Share

Recommended Posts

They're trying to overpopulate the UK with migrants, but they're also trying to depopulate the planet with the pandemic. Fucking THEM. :panic:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me too. Still decent patter though. Very convenient that the man who thought condoms were about to be taxed was also switched on enough to immediately recall that Sunak's wife is a nondom. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Renton said:

This graph tells me that 75% of 2019 tory voters are cunts, and 24% are uber cunts. 

 

image.png.ef2f37244c96e2e5106ac8bcb87572a3.png

buuuuut the rest are sound, so there's that at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Renton said:

 

 

 

Labour should do something about this while in power. Make it illegal to lie in political advertising and attach massive, campaign-busting fines to it. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aye. They've also been campaigning using their opponent's colours, onfuscated who candidates really represent, and have set up a fake "fact check" website like last time. 

Quite heartening nobody seems to buying it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Renton said:

Aye. They've also been campaigning using their opponent's colours, onfuscated who candidates really represent, and have set up a fake "fact check" website like last time. 

Quite heartening nobody seems to buying it. 

 

This is why it's a weird tactic. It's not going to convince anybody but the already dyed in the wool Tory voter. Those departing for Lib Dems or Greens aren't stupid enough to buy it, and those leaving for Reform aren't going to see it as a sign to stick with the Tories but further 'proof' you can't trust the 'establishment'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not keen on 19 reform seats mind. The tories have completely fucked everything in this country, including politics itself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gemmill said:

Not sure any of this stuff matters, but the Economist has endorsed Labour for the first time since 2005.

 

Did they endorse the tories the other time, or were they neutral? If the former, the Economist can suck my balls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

8 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

 

 

Absolutely STINKING reading for the Tories. Which is nice. 

 

Should’ve sent the beeb. They’d have found a few loyal ones 

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Latest ploy by the conservatives, to say a vote for Labour is a "surrender". Which is patroinising bollocks which I am sure yet again will be counterproductive.

 

 
People of this country need to STAND UP AND FIGHT!
 
image.png.806813ce6c81ddc0dde73804aecfa466.png
 
 

 

Edited by Renton
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Alex said:

 

Should’ve sent the beeb. They’d have found a few loyal ones 

 

They went to Liverpool yesterday (10pm news) and somehow couldn't find a Labour voter! :lol:

 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Renton said:

Latest ploy by the conservatives, to say a vote for Labour is a "surrender". Which is patroinising bollocks which I am sure yet again will be counterproductive.

 

 
People of this country need to STAND UP AND FIGHT!
 
image.png.806813ce6c81ddc0dde73804aecfa466.png
 
 

 

 

They're getting a load of shit for it. It'll probably be deleted later in the day, or he can keep it up and confirm that he's a cunt that way instead. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.