wykikitoon 19943 Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 I've subscribed to that good law project for the last few years. They do some great work. Problem is. The government have more money. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinRobin 11151 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 12 hours ago, Sonatine said: 🙂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinRobin 11151 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 🙂 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 6993 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 Diverse crowd 👌🏼 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21823 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 Like something out of the Adams family 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinRobin 11151 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30295 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 That was so 2016. He’s moved on to a new grift now. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 17112 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 (edited) Tata are closing the blast furnaces and removing them then building allegedly greener electric arc furnaces to replace them . Unions have put forward a proposal to keep one open (and the associated jobs) whilst the other one is being sorted. The uk government have given Tata £500 mill to achieve this. Tata obviously rejected the union proposal. Regardless of Brexit removing various EU trade protections over steel production that are in place across the whole bloc am not sure if Tata’s motivations and intentions are anything at all to do with whether the UK is in the EU or not. Is net zero an EU aspiration or did a Tory government decide unilaterally that it was a good idea?… Edited January 20 by PaddockLad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 9737 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 2 hours ago, PaddockLad said: Tata are closing the blast furnaces and removing them then building allegedly greener electric arc furnaces to replace them . Unions have put forward a proposal to keep one open (and the associated jobs) whilst the other one is being sorted. The uk government have given Tata £500 mill to achieve this. Tata obviously rejected the union proposal. Regardless of Brexit removing various EU trade protections over steel production that are in place across the whole bloc am not sure if Tata’s motivations and intentions are anything at all to do with whether the UK is in the EU or not. Is net zero an EU aspiration or did a Tory government decide unilaterally that it was a good idea?… https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/climate-strategies-targets/2050-long-term-strategy_en 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 17112 Posted January 21 Share Posted January 21 (edited) So we’ve signed up for net zero after we’ve left the EU. It’s nothing to do with Brexit. If you’re against losing 3k jobs (who isn’t?) fair enough but Farage and his pre Brexit bullshit have little to do with it. His comments are irrelevant. It’s on Tata and the present government as far as I can make out. Of course the jumped up little fascist is now making capital from it but that’s bollocks too. Tata have apparently run the fuckin place into the ground deliberately… Edited January 21 by PaddockLad 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 34877 Posted January 21 Share Posted January 21 (edited) You could say the same about virtually everything he says though. All his commentary is predicated on what he’d do / what would happen knowing full well he’s never going to be in a position to deliver or even influence policy. Even the Brexit stuff is always later given the caveat it wasn’t the right kind of Brexit, opportunities have been squandered etc. Edited January 21 by Alex 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 17112 Posted January 21 Share Posted January 21 (edited) Lots of big accounts on X blaming either Brexit or net zero.. all agenda driven bollocks. Tata wanted to close Port Talbot and the rest of British Steel and this government has bunged them 500 mill to do so. No significant steel making capability now in the country that used to build ships for the whole world. That’s tragic not to mention dangerous from a manufacturing security point of view. What if China/Russia/some other set of cunts try to blockade imports? 😒 Edited January 21 by PaddockLad 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21364 Posted January 21 Share Posted January 21 (edited) I'd feel more comfortable about us losing the ability to manufacture virgin steel if we were part of a pan-european union rather than an isolated Billy no mates island mind. Net zero set by country is bollocks too. Importing high quality steel will clearly have a worse effect than if we made our own. Net zero should be measured as much on consumption as production. Edited January 21 by Renton 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21823 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 On 21/01/2024 at 09:44, Alex said: You could say the same about virtually everything he says though. All his commentary is predicated on what he’d do / what would happen knowing full well he’s never going to be in a position to deliver or even influence policy. Even the Brexit stuff is always later given the caveat it wasn’t the right kind of Brexit, opportunities have been squandered etc. the benefits of Brexit are always just around the corner. Funny, that 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 19943 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Enjoy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30295 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4373 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 59 minutes ago, wykikitoon said: Enjoy Deserve everything just for using asses instead of arses. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21364 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 (edited) 2 hours ago, wykikitoon said: Enjoy She has four kids. Her husband earns 75k a year (that's 53k after tax) but she sends 2 of the kids (fuck knows about the other 2) to a private school for 15k each a year. So she spends more than half her husband's salary on private schools? What about her mortgage? This is clearly unsustainable, whatever VAT LAbour are going to add. Spare me the fucking boo hoos and move house to somewhere with better state education if the local schools aren't good enough for you. The following paragraph where she bemoans her neighbours spending all their money on booze, takeaways and lottery tickets. Any residual empathy I might have had for her is gone. Fuck off you welly fannied Karen. Edited January 23 by Renton 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44424 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Her timeline is a shit show. All climate change denial and other conspiracy stuff. She can ram all of it and her dopey kids up her hoop. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21364 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 5 minutes ago, Gemmill said: Her timeline is a shit show. All climate change denial and other conspiracy stuff. She can ram all of it and her dopey kids up her hoop. Aye, thicker than whale spunk. Maybe if she saved money on her blue tick and actually worked instead of doing all this "research" and posting shit on the internet she could afford to look after her kids properly. Christ, imagine being married to her? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 42106 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 1 minute ago, Renton said: Christ, imagine being married to her? Just tell her that male monogamy is what the Illuminati want, then get stuck in to her sisters. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30295 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 17 minutes ago, Renton said: She has four kids. Her husband earns 75k a year (that's 53k after tax) but she sends 2 of the kids (fuck knows about the other 2) to a private school for 15k each a year. So she spends more than half her husband's salary on private schools? What about her mortgage? This is clearly unsustainable, whatever VAT LAbour are going to add. Spare me the fucking boo hoos and move house to somewhere with better state education if the local schools aren't good enough for you. The following paragraph where she bemoans her neighbours spending all their money on booze, takeaways and lottery tickets. Any residual empathy I might have had for her is gone. Fuck off you welly fannied Karen. She has absolutely zero awareness about why her local state school might be so shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21364 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 "Chemtrails" btw. Where the hell is Parky when you need him. Here's a photo of the dastardly RAF in WW2 not going out to bomb Fritz, no, but even then spraying us with chemical for <insert reason here>. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinRobin 11151 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 31 minutes ago, ewerk said: She has absolutely zero awareness FYP 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44424 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 If her kids are as thick as her, there's a good chance she's wasting £15k a year. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.403f4a475ac3bb53997c2626c09ef800.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now