Gemmill 44900 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 Cabinet of all the brain cells. Hasn't Truss already admitted they didn't share the mini budget with cabinet? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 42459 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21627 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 34 minutes ago, Gemmill said: Cabinet of all the brain cells. Hasn't Truss already admitted they didn't share the mini budget with cabinet? Yep. Mind the tories were pretty vocal in cheering it when it was announced in parliament, particularly the bits about tax cuts for the ultra-rich. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack 9431 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trooper 940 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 When she turns up to PMQ's tomorrow I expect Ian Blackford to go gor the "juggler" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30620 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 18 hours ago, Meenzer said: Truss's personal approval rating is now -61 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 I've just had a software subscription service renewal come through at work. 46% increase since this time last year thanks to the value of the pound. Fucking nuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginolaandtonic 169 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 (edited) 25 minutes ago, Craig said: I've just had a software subscription service renewal come through at work. 46% increase since this time last year thanks to the value of the pound. Fucking nuts. software subscription service Edited October 18, 2022 by Ginolaandtonic 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 8 minutes ago, Ginolaandtonic said: software subscription service if only it was that exciting. DLP so fairly fundamental. Hikes of that level are crippling for a business our size. Meanwhile the energy giants continue to evade windfall tax. It's utterly disgusting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21627 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 Nice to see how democratic the tory party is. No need for an election for the new tory leader apparently. Of course, I seriously doubt the parliamentary party could agree on a "unity" candidate anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 Put bluntly, the need to reaffirm if their mandate from 3 years ago, pre-Brexit, pre-Pandemic and pre-Starmer is still valid. We all know the answer, but we were in a totally different economic, and political climate in December 2019. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5223 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 39 minutes ago, Craig said: if only it was that exciting. DLP so fairly fundamental. Hikes of that level are crippling for a business our size. Meanwhile the energy giants continue to evade windfall tax. It's utterly disgusting. The Tories were clear on this tbf. "Fuck business" I believe was one of the post-referendum comments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44900 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 Looks like the triple lock is about to be abandoned, so we can assume that benefits won't be uplifted for inflation either. They're saying they'll stick with the commitment for defence spending to be 3% of GDP though so Ben Wallace can continue playing fat action man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30620 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 15 minutes ago, Craig said: Put bluntly, the need to reaffirm if their mandate from 3 years ago, pre-Brexit, pre-Pandemic and pre-Starmer is still valid. We all know the answer, but we were in a totally different economic, and political climate in December 2019. The governing party isn't elected for a three year term though. It's rare that the political landscape doesn't change over any government's five year term. You can disagree with it but they're well within their rights not to call an election. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21627 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 Looks like they are now dumping the triple lock on pensions. Another tick on their suicide box. [I have to say, I don't think pensioners should get special treatment over working families on tax credits btw, but this is going to hugely fuck off their voter base]. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21627 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 1 minute ago, ewerk said: they're well within their rights not to call an election Constitutionally maybe, but really, morally, they aren't. And we all know it, and they are fucked whichever way they decide to go now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30620 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 Just now, Renton said: Constitutionally maybe, but really, morally, they aren't. And we all know it, and they are fucked whichever way they decide to go now. Firstly, they obviously don't give a fuck about morals but also why are they morally obliged to do so? Should every unpopular government sacrifice themselves? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 22 minutes ago, ewerk said: The governing party isn't elected for a three year term though. It's rare that the political landscape doesn't change over any government's five year term. You can disagree with it but they're well within their rights not to call an election. They may be within rights, but it's putting self-interest ahead of the country's needs and empitomises these cunts. Rattling on that "we have a strong mandate" is no longer valid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30620 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 Would any political party call an election right now if they were in the same position? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35095 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 (edited) Unless there’s a mass exodus to Labour an election isn’t in the post. And that would be career suicide anyway for those Tory MPs. Truss is a goner though. It’s just a case of when as they aren’t about to let her lead them to an electoral annihilation Edited October 18, 2022 by Alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21627 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 (edited) 38 minutes ago, ewerk said: Firstly, they obviously don't give a fuck about morals but also why are they morally obliged to do so? Should every unpopular government sacrifice themselves? Because it's a zombie government, not just unpopular, which is damaging the country. How is it moral to continue with this? And how is it democratic to change leaders multiple times? I can only assume you arew playing devil's advocate here. Putting party before country is clearly not moral. Edited October 18, 2022 by Renton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35095 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 Well they certainly aren’t constitutionally or legally obliged. We’re kind of in uncharted territory here but then clinging on is entirely to be expected imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30620 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Renton said: Because it's a zombie government, not just unpopular, which is damaging the country. How is it moral to continue with this? And how is it democratic to change leaders multiple times? I can only assume you arew playing devil's advocate here. Putting party before country is clearly not moral. It's moral because the people voted them in. These weren't nice, competent politicians to begin with, they haven't suddenly become worse since 2019. They're cunts and they told the country they were cunts and yet the country voted the cunts in. Regarding the change of leader, we live in a parliamentary system. Despite the fact that Johnson claimed a personal mandate it was technically a mandate for the Conservative party and that party still commands the HoC. I'd like to see the cunts out as much as anyone but the fact is that they are free to govern until 2024 as long as they have a majority and are under no obligation to call an election that will decimate their party. Edited October 18, 2022 by ewerk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21627 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 9 minutes ago, ewerk said: It's moral because the people voted them in. These weren't nice, competent politicians to begin with, they haven't suddenly become worse since 2019. They're cunts and they told the country they were cunts and yet the country voted the cunts in. Regarding the change of leader, we live in a parliamentary system. Despite the fact that Johnson claimed a personal mandate it was technically a mandate for the Conservative party and that party still commands the HoC. I'd like to see the cunts out as much as anyone but the fact is that they are free to govern until 2024 as long as they have a majority and are under no obligation to call an election that will decimate their party. Once again, they're not under a legal requirement, no. But it's not just their leader they have changed (potentially twice), it's their entire manifesto. Instead of levelling up, we now have auserity mark 2. Literally nobody voted for that. Of course it's immoral they continue, of course they will continue out of self-interest. But self interest on this basis is inherently immoral. ANd btw, to be pedantic decimate means reduce by 10%. They are going to be more than decimated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30620 Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 9 minutes ago, Renton said: ANd btw, to be pedantic decimate means reduce by 10%. They are going to be more than decimated. To be pedantic that may be the origin of the word but is not the only literal meaning of the word today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now