Jump to content

Politics


Christmas Tree
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ewerk said:

Everyone:

Everyone:

Everyone:

Labour: FREE BROADBAND FOR ALL!!!

Everyone: Mmmmm, okay...

 

That isn't how that meme works, grandpa. Don't make me hit you with an 'ok boomer'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rayvin said:

Will HS2, at £70bn or whatever it is now, be as productive for the economy as free broadband? I'm doubtful. Renton may disagree.

 

I was on a train coming back from London today that was absolutely rammed, like a rush hour tube. But for a 4 hour journey. So yes, we desperately need more capacity on the railways. 

 

Why cant we do both? Provide access to great public transport and broadband? But for free, seriously?  What next, free water, utilities, food? I'm sorry, fibre optic broadband isn't some kind of human right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Renton said:

 

I was on a train coming back from London today that was absolutely rammed, like a rush hour tube. But for a 4 hour journey. So yes, we desperately need more capacity on the railways. 

 

Why cant we do both? Provide access to great public transport and broadband? But for free, seriously?  What next, free water, utilities, food? I'm sorry, fibre optic broadband isn't some kind of human right. 

 

Your issue is the free bit? Idk man, they've only included this because they felt it would be eye catching. They might not even follow through with it. But in terms of getting people's attention, it's succeeding. I mean Johnson is promising all kinds of bollocks about Brexit, I don't see the harm in Labour playing the game a bit on a policy that's popular.

 

They're not gonna be able to do it anyway, so who cares. They'll be minority government at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Meenzer said:

Interesting thread, not that it tells us much we couldn't have gathered already I suppose, but interesting nonetheless

 

 

 

Actually very interesting. Not much we can do about it now sadly.

 

Corbyn is a terrorist sympathising, Stalinist enthusiast, UK hating old man.

 

Johnson is a lying, philandering, insincere, cruel and cynical bastard.

 

While only one of those statements is true, the public clearly can't be expected to establish truth on their own. Which does indeed make Corbyn a liability. Either way he's gone after this. I don't think he'll even see out a full term if he wins it. He looks fed up of all of this now IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Political Party podcast is well worth a listen anyway, but he's doing daily interview episodes during the campaign. The one he did with Gloria De Piero this week - I went from not thinking much of her to being disappointed she's standing down. Well worth a listen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it was deliberate, whoever made the call was completely brainless, given it was literally just reported in the mirror that he laid the wreath upside down.

These types of human errors happen, particularly with an archive system as unwieldy as the BBC’s. I don’t buy the conspiracy that it was some senior editorial decision by the beeb to cover up Johnson’s mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Alex said:

I still find it incredible the BBC is claiming showing 3 year old footage of Johnson the day after Remembrance Sunday was a genuine mistake. 

It was very much deliberate & they would have had to go to some effort to make it happen.

Well I reckon it would have been 10-15 minutes work which on that schedule is tight. 

Every time they make this kind of “mistake” it always seems to be beneficial to the tories.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Tom said:

It was very much deliberate & they would have had to go to some effort to make it happen.

Well I reckon it would have been 10-15 minutes work which on that schedule is tight. 

Every time they make this kind of “mistake” it always seems to be beneficial to the tories.

 

These sort of production errors happen all the time. If it was deliberate, whoever made the call was clearly a moron if they thought for a moment no one would notice given it was literally just reported that he laid it upside down.

The notion that some shady senior BBC editor made this happen in order to make Johnson look better is beyond absurd. It would have leaked by now if there was any truth in it.

Read the twitter thread from Chris Cook, someone who has hands on experience working in the BBC newsroom. 

Edited by Dr Gloom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.