Jump to content

Politics


Christmas Tree
 Share

Recommended Posts

Well, he either needs to do that or convincingly shift the narrative elsewhere. He isn't going to turn around on immigration so the plan must be to hijack the narrative.

 

It's doable, it's just unlikely to work since UKIP have already made and entrenched over about a decade their case for anti-immigration populism.

It's really not doable. You seem to be making the same mistake as was done with Brexit by patronising people with talks of narratives as if immigration isn't a real issue in some parts of the country.

 

Look at Corbyn, a lentil munching islingtonista who believes in virtual unlimited immigration and yet incredibly is also anti-EU. He is the epitome of what most Brexiteers despise. People will not vote for him, as has been proven in recent polls or by elections. Traditional labour won't vote him. Blairites like me might not. He's taking the party to oblivion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing he can do to improve labour's chances on an election is resign. That's not a flippant remark, it's a fact. He can't change his lifelong beliefs without appearing to be an unprincipled hypocrite, and the electorate don't support his beliefs. Also, labour under his leadership have been completely incoherent about Brexit and the post-Brexit world. This will be the main issue next election. Labour are fucked, in short. What's most depressing is they can't get their act together against a truly pathetic opposition.

 

I agree with all of that but I think his biggest failing is that he is an entirely unimpressive man. Though he has been improving he still is not what you would call charismatic, not someone who you enjoy listening to. 

 

Compare that to Bernie Sanders. He may be a short arse, balding Jew espousing leftist politics but he grabs your attention and speaks with real force. Corbyn will never be that sort of character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's really not doable. You seem to be making the same mistake as was done with Brexit by patronising people with talks of narratives as if immigration isn't a real issue in some parts of the country.

 

Look at Corbyn, a lentil munching islingtonista who believes in virtual unlimited immigration and yet incredibly is also anti-EU. He is the epitome of what most Brexiteers despise. People will not vote for him, as has been proven in recent polls or by elections. Traditional labour won't vote him. Blairites like me might not. He's taking the party to oblivion.

 

I'm not saying immigration isn't an issue, I'm just saying it isn't the only issue. If we consider that austerity is one of the main driving forces behind our current woes, then I think it would be possible to create a narrative around that which many people would buy into. That said, as I've mentioned, the ship may well have sailed on this front as the immigration rhetoric has been entirely unchallenged in the same way that the austerity rhetoric was entirely unchallenged. Labour has been so crap at identifying and challenging these positions for so long now that it's hardly a surprise that it is where it is.

 

I'm not saying that this initiative -will- work. I'm saying that 1) they have to try something and 2) populist narratives are not limited to immigrants - other options are possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with all of that but I think his biggest failing is that he is an entirely unimpressive man. Though he has been improving he still is not what you would call charismatic, not someone who you enjoy listening to. 

 

Compare that to Bernie Sanders. He may be a short arse, balding Jew espousing leftist politics but he grabs your attention and speaks with real force. Corbyn will never be that sort of character.

 

Yep, this makes sense but then Labour don't have anyone else in that mould. Moreover, I remain somewhat bemused that you guys think jettisoning Corbyn is going to bring the good times back for Labour. All I see it doing is alienating their 600k strong membership, a large proportion of whom will abandon the party if it heads back to the centre, and having to start all over again. I don't think I'd vote for them in future if they leave the left once again. Although to be honest, it's sorely tempting to just resign myself to the fact that my votes will always be meaningless and that I shouldn't bother.

 

EDIT - If Corbyn stood down of his own accord it might go differently.

Edited by Rayvin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Menzies Campbell quit as liberal leader when polling showed he was a failure which you could call brave in that context. Trouble is Corbyn seems to be a stubborn bastard on that score.

 

My worry would be that if he did go, the candidates willing to stand would either be unimpressive or unable to count on any support of the new members leading to Eagle/Smith calibre runners or worse Diane Abbot.

 

It's a shitstorm really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vast maj of the electorate are told what they want. /MSM

 

If Corby was presented and packaged in a different light by fair coverage we wouldn't be having this discussion.

 

Labour are unelectable for a broad range of issues. Some of it is to do with leadership but not all.

Edited by Park Life
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Menzies Campbell quit as liberal leader when polling showed he was a failure which you could call brave in that context. Trouble is Corbyn seems to be a stubborn bastard on that score.

 

My worry would be that if he did go, the candidates willing to stand would either be unimpressive or unable to count on any support of the new members leading to Eagle/Smith calibre runners or worse Diane Abbot.

 

It's a shitstorm really.

Blair wants to come back innit. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lads, it's about to be the weekend. Don't waste your Friday doing this again.

 

Actually a very fair point, I don't have the energy for this today anyway. I'll get on with some work I guess...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, this in the news today about the same good, god fearing, Christian MP.

 

 

An MP will repay almost £14,000 in expenses after an investigation found his staff claimed for a quarter of all staff mileage by the entire House of Commons in 2014/15.

 
Democratic Unionist Jim Shannon will pay back £13,926 in mileage claims after it was found that by the end of the 2014-15 financial year his staff had travelled 121,259 miles.
 
The genuine claims were five times greater than the second highest claiming MP - and 37 times greater than the average across all MPs, a parliamentary watchdog said.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a colleague who is trying to fly back to Greece on Saturday to get home for Christmas but is likely to be at least delayed because of the Swissport strikes. His view is that he understands why it is happening, why they've chosen those days, but feels it is unfortunate that it affects him. That's a pretty solid response given that he might not see his ridiculously family-centric family for Christmas as a result.

 

If he can look at it maturely and judge that people need to do this sometimes to protect their rights, then frankly the PM can fuck off.

 

That said - Swissport look like they've offered the financials that were asked for, so I'm not even certain what the issue is anymore...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Labour's shadow home secretary, Diane Abbott, again showing Labour's ability to lead, “It’s not my role to second-guess the decisions of trade union leadership.”

Edited by ewerk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.