Jump to content

Politics


Christmas Tree
 Share

Recommended Posts

So today we've had a list of Labour MPs who are hostile to Corbyn leaked on the same day that Labour take the lead in the polls and just after the Tory budget nightmare.

 

:lol: I know everyone says he has no chance of winning but the lengths people are going to to try and ensure this are staggering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not as bad as being in the hostile group tbf. You'd always expect there to be some people in a party who don't agree with the leadership, and as long as they conduct themselves professionally I don't see any harm in that. It's those who are actively trying to undermine Corbyn and who are therefore distracting everyone from the Tories, who are doing the most damage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

unfortunately, corbyn again failed to really hammer them and the news agenda has moved on to brussels.

 

Paul Mason was lavishing Corbyn with praise for how he's handled the Tory cuts

 

 

Scratch. One. Tory.

 

“I am unable to watch passively whilst certain policies are enacted in order to meet the fiscal self-imposed restraints that I believe are more and more perceived as distinctly political rather than in the national economic interest,”

Iain Duncan Smith, former UK Welfare Secretary

 

Iain Duncan Smith has resigned from the British government after the annual budget included a £1.3bn attack on disability benefits. Here’s what it means in five bullet points:

 

  1. Austerity has hit the buffers. Its aim, according to Conservative economic theory, is to kickstart growth. But it hasn’t so they need more austerity. At some point the austerity vs humanity problem was going to trigger the conscience of a Tory minister and this is it.
  2. The background is the vicious Tory infighting over Europe. Given the Cameron faction is using the whole bag of dirty tricks against the Johnson/Duncan Smith faction over Brexit, IDS has clearly had enough. There will now be a strong challenge to Cameron after 23 June, whether Britain votes to stay or leave.
  3. Osborne’s budget is unravelling. The education secretary Nicky Morgan last night suggested billions of pounds worth of cuts were “suggestions”. She had to cut short a TV interview today. My long engagement with Westminster leads me to see this as circumstatial evidence of a wider civil war inside the Conservative government over the scale of pointless austerity Osborne is imposing to reach his — clearly unreachable and stupid — fiscal targets.
  4. This is Jeremy Corbyn’s victory. In one speech he’s blown apart the Tory front bench, made likely two substantial revolts, destroyed the cabinet and made the Tories look like incompetent fools. And the weekend is young: it’s probably not over. IDS’ letter to Cameron draws the logic clearly.
  5. It’s a disaster for Blairites. They’d prepared their cabbage patches of opposition to Labour’s own new fiscal rule, and spent weeks revving up to diss Corbyn over his expected mishandling of the Budget. Instead Labour is ahead in one poll, tied in another, and its radical left leadership looks not just vindicated politically, but — and this matters in the Commons — tactically: Corbyn and McDonnell executed a near perfect hit on the government by announcing their own fiscal rule; denouncing the benefit cuts; and now splitting the cabinet.

It is no longer “put up or shut up” time for the Progress wing of Labour. Just the latter.

 

As for the Cameron government: its disarray tonight is of a different order to, for example, the Heseltine resignation of 1986. That happened while Thatcherism was in its ascendant. This happens while Cameronism — whatever that actually is — has descended into ideological and governmental disarray.

 

https://medium.com/mosquito-ridge/scratch-one-tory-1efdada64080#.lo7mby6kt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many wondering why no mention of US elites in the Panama papers...

 

Editor of Süddeutsche Zeitung responded to the lack of U.S. individuals in the documents, saying "Just wait for what is coming next"

 

Hooooo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's never been a secret that Cameron's father was a tax fiddler but it's good to see the details laid out.

 

As others have said this is just one law firm from one tax haven - the true scale is monstrous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'll be interesting to see how much is made of this compared to the disgusting stuff that was printed about Ralph Miliband's supposedly traitorous past opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How fucking creepy are the photos of Cameron's dad. They look like Cameron after he's had a sip out of the fake Holy Grail. I'd love to think these revelations could ruin him, but I suspect they'll blow over with Labour unable to land any decisive blows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loving the fact that the best PM in CT's lifetime has been walking about with his trousers round his ankles getting his bollocks flicked the past few days. Hope there's more revelations to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perfect timng but I had to do an annual money laundering on line course/test thing yesterday and it showed how the FCA is pissing in the wind trying to get banks etc in this country to reject dodgy money when theres an entire system already setup for the rich and corrupt to bypass everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't really followed this but if it's illegal hang them.

 

Think the problem is more that tax avoidance for the wealthy is entirely legal.

 

...and yes, before you say it, neither Blair or Brown did owt about that either, but nor did they cut the welfare state to ribbons and blame the poorest in society for not contributing their fair share.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Think the problem is more that tax avoidance for the wealthy is entirely legal.

 

...and yes, before you say it, neither Blair or Brown did owt about that either, but nor did they cut the welfare state to ribbons and blame the poorest in society for not contributing their fair share.

It's legal because those who benefit are the ones who make the laws or buy those who do.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.