Jump to content

US election 2016


Happy Face
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hilary really went after those women that's all on record. This is a woman who destroyed 14 of her mobile phones and poured acid on her hard drives when under investigation. Neither of them are fit to be President.

That's agreed by most sensible people. They also agree that Clinton is the lesser of 2 evils though.

 

I'm amazed that 'yeah I did wrong but your husband did worse' is the best defence he can come up with. It's laughable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's agreed by most sensible people. They also agree that Clinton is the lesser of 2 evils though.

 

I'm amazed that 'yeah I did wrong but your husband did worse' is the best defence he can come up with. It's laughable

 

it really isn't. the acid wash allegation is another of trump's lies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's agreed by most sensible people. They also agree that Clinton is the lesser of 2 evils though.

 

I'm amazed that 'yeah I did wrong but your husband did worse' is the best defence he can come up with. It's laughable

He's saving her 'girlfriend' for the third debate. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:joker:

 

The free software they used to wipe the drives was called "bleach clean" or something.

 

Don't know why anyone has taken this to mean she got the marigolds out and started rubbing acid into the hard drive casing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm confused. I thought the nominee was Hilary Clinton, not Bill Clinton. So on the one hand we have a video tape of trump admitting he has sexually abused women. On the other hand, we have three uncorroborated witnesses that claim the husband of the democrat candidate sexually assaulted them 20 to 40 years ago. Which is worse?

 

What I don't get is that these women are claiming that they were abused yet are siting side by side with a man who bragged about being able to abuse women. They lose all credibility there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The free software they used to wipe the drives was called "bleach clean" or something.

 

Don't know why anyone has taken this to mean she got the marigolds out and started rubbing acid into the hard drive casing.

 

and it was her lawyer who did it, not hillary. 

 

not that it makes much difference. it's still shady as fuck and the main weapon trump has to hit clinton's credibility with. 

 

the fact that trump is still standing after the hits he has taken to his credibility mind is beyond belief. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The free software they used to wipe the drives was called "bleach clean" or something.

 

Don't know why anyone has taken this to mean she got the marigolds out and started rubbing acid into the hard drive casing.

 

:lol: trump since tried to backtrack, saying it was a play on words or something because of the name of the software. like he had a fucking clue what he was talking about for once. 

Edited by Dr Gloom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't get the hatred of Hillary. It'd policy that matter ateotd. Clinton's policies are fairly progressive. Trumps are hateful.

 

That's the way politics is going. Unless you're to the left of Trotsky you're seen as a sell out/corporate stooge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The free software they used to wipe the drives was called "bleach clean" or something.

 

Don't know why anyone has taken this to mean she got the marigolds out and started rubbing acid into the hard drive casing.

It was acid man...Made for the Third Reich by Jewish slaves in death camps and sold by Bayer to Hilary Clinton's grandad who was in the KKK while masquerading as a garment salesman. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't get the hatred of Hillary. It'd policy that matter ateotd. Clinton's policies are fairly progressive. Trumps are hateful.

She is a consummate warmonger and Wall Street apologist. She even tried to talk Obama into invading Syria which would have started WW3.

 

 

Mr Bash describes a foreign policy more hawkish than that of the current administration. He said there were a "lot of clues" to how Mrs Clinton will behave as commander-in-chief from her time as secretary of state. During that time she championed the intervention in Libya and advocated the arming of Syrian rebels against the regime."

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/29/hillary-clinton-will-reset-syria-policy-against-murderous-assad/

 

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/18328

 

Hillary Clinton is a hawk and warmonger. People often point to her vote in 2002 for going to war in Iraq and her enthusiasm for it. After all, it was during her husband’s presidency that toppling the regime of Saddam Hussein became the official policy of the United States. But, her track record of starting and supporting wars, and siding with despots is much deeper than Iraq. She supported the coup in Honduras in 2009 and in Ukraine in 2014; was the leading advocate of the U.S. and NATO intervention in Libya that turned that economically advanced nation into a hub for all types of terrorist groups; laughed shamelessly at the news of Muammar Ghaddafi’s murder; supported extra-judicial assassinations by drones; backed escalation of the war in Afghanistan ordered by President Obama, and has taken an extremely hawkish stance toward Russia. And as Secretary of State she supported massive sale of advanced US weapons to Saudi Arabia and its allies in the Persian Gulf area, all reactionary dictatorships, the same weapons that are being used to attack Yemen."

Edited by Park Life
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No doubt it will all be out the widow if he wins. ;)

 

He hasn't done enough with regard to the black vote, just banging on about inner cities isn't enough. It's a very soft area because Obama has done nothing for blacks.

 

Aren't there rumblings that there's audio/video of him dropping the N-Bomb?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

amazing to listen to the various voxpops of trump's supporters - many of whom are women - defend his comments as locker room banter and attacking the clintons. these people are never going to be turned. 

 

but surely, surely, he has offended too many other voter groups to have a chance? surely? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.