Park Life 71 Posted September 13, 2016 Share Posted September 13, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 34286 Posted September 13, 2016 Share Posted September 13, 2016 UK or US fanny? It's an important distinction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 6384 Posted September 13, 2016 Share Posted September 13, 2016 Parkinsons. It's what happens when you go up against the antichrist. About 3 weeks ago on my conspiracy site they were saying she was done and everyone took a deep breath. You run a conspiracy site? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15199 Posted September 13, 2016 Share Posted September 13, 2016 You run a conspiracy site? Well, that's what the Bilderberg Group wants us to believe... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted September 14, 2016 Author Share Posted September 14, 2016 Wikileaks have dropped another massive load of DNC emails. DNC response is to tell people not to read them as they'll be full of Malware. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 29809 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 And that's okay with you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 (edited) Libya report out. Clinton gonna get hit by Trump again....He's been going on about Libya for ages. Cameron, who stood down as an MP on Monday, has refused to give evidence to the select committee. In one of his few reflections on his major military intervention, he blamed the Libyan people for failing to take their chance of democracy." Edited September 14, 2016 by Park Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted September 14, 2016 Author Share Posted September 14, 2016 And that's okay with you? ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 43234 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 ewerk is Irish establishment. He's not happy with the wiki leaks leak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 29809 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 ?? The leaks. Not the DNC response. You've previously been vocal in your defence of Wikileak's work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 "Vocal". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 29809 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 You got something to add, Maxwell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 You got something to add, Maxwell? Waiting for the initial exchanges while I file my nails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted September 14, 2016 Author Share Posted September 14, 2016 The leaks. Not the DNC response. You've previously been vocal in your defence of Wikileak's work. Yeah, I think the leaks are great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 29809 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 No they aren't. Your move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted September 14, 2016 Author Share Posted September 14, 2016 No they aren't. Your move. I've been vocal in my defence of Wikileaks work. Your turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 29809 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 So there's nothing wrong with the fact that Wikileaks are still releasing personal information? That they're allowing themselves to be used by Russian factors to influence the US election. You're cool with all that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 43234 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 The more information that the electorate has at their disposal, the better equipped they are to make a decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 29809 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 They need the VP nominees phone number? The personal details of every donor? And is the RNC's cyber security so much better? Or is the DNC being deliberately attacked in an effort to unfairly influence the election? Of course there are things we should know but there is also a basic right to privacy that Wikileaks does not respect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 34286 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 Putin would love Trump to win like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted September 14, 2016 Author Share Posted September 14, 2016 So there's nothing wrong with the fact that Wikileaks are still releasing personal information? That they're allowing themselves to be used by Russian factors to influence the US election. You're cool with all that? You expect Wikileaks to bury truthful information that highlights wrongdoing and leads to the resignations of high (the highest?) ranking DNC officials? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 20620 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 The more information that the electorate has at their disposal, the better equipped they are to make a decision. In principle but what are the motives of the informants and why should they choose what is released. The idea if an informed electorate is nonsense anyway, just look at CT. We're in the post factual era now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 20620 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 Putin would love Trump to win like So would Gemmill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 29809 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 You expect Wikileaks to bury truthful information that highlights wrongdoing and leads to the resignations of high (the highest?) ranking DNC officials? No but is publishing donor's phone number and email address necessary? Is publishing credit card details necessary. Is publishing the name of everyone who donated fairly and according to the law necessary. Wikileaks makes no effort to distinguish the necessary from the dangerous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted September 14, 2016 Author Share Posted September 14, 2016 Dan Carlin's latest Common Sense is good on this topic btw.... http://www.dancarlin.com/product/common-sense-309-a-bodyguard-of-lies/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now