Andrew 4756 Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 Not really. But Pards likes to start him. Ideally I'd like to go. .....................Cisse................. ..............Marv.........Hatem .....................Cabaye............ ..............Tiote..........Anita....... NewLB....Collo.....NewCD.....Santon no Ba? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 no Ba? Think he's leaving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
essembeeofsunderland 811 Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 Jonas 2008/9 Games 23 Goals 0 Assists 3 2009/10 Games 34 Goals 4 Assists 7 2010/11 Games 34 Goals 3 Assists 4 2011/12 Games 37 Goals 2 Assists 3 2012/13 Games 15 Goals 0 Assists 0 Remember how easy it is to be rewarded an assist. My only defence for him is that he is playing on the left,which is his weaker side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4725 Posted December 13, 2012 Author Share Posted December 13, 2012 Think he's leaving. Aye, I think I would much rather get Cisse / the team working. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15531 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7030 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 *drools* Drools at the raping santon will get when he's in their half for most of the game? I love these champ manager formations that totally forget a Sunday league manager would be able to figure out you just need to double up on the full backs on such a narrow formation and we would be 3-0 down after 10mins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4725 Posted December 14, 2012 Author Share Posted December 14, 2012 Drools at the raping santon will get when he's in their half for most of the game? I love these champ manager formations that totally forget a Sunday league manager would be able to figure out you just need to double up on the full backs on such a narrow formation and we would be 3-0 down after 10mins Maybe, just maybe.....If, we had people on the wings who could get down the wing and attack then maybe we would be so reliant on our defenders doing it for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7030 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 (edited) But that formation had none on the wings at all Edited December 14, 2012 by TheRollingStones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4725 Posted December 14, 2012 Author Share Posted December 14, 2012 But that formation had none on the wings at all Fluidity. Marv and Hatem would be everywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14011 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 Agree with J69. It would be 334 in attack & with Simpson/Santon's keeness to get back recently we'd get raped. Plus I'd much rather have Santon at left back, he's better attacking/defending Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14011 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 Fluidity. Marv and Hatem would be everywhere. You've got them posted as number 8 & 10...inside forwards. So they really wouldn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7030 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 Fuck off man it takes about 3seconds to switch the play to the opposite flank, nee fucker can run that fast. You are talking absolute bollocks for a change Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14011 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 Are you addressing me or CT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7030 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 CT! You can imagine his team talk 'Hatem, you just like run around all over, left wing, right wing, just be everywhere, like white on rice. It can't fail' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4725 Posted December 14, 2012 Author Share Posted December 14, 2012 Im with Parky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14011 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 "Marv, I've not seen much of you, you any good?' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14011 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 Im with Parky So is E.T. I'd like to see Parky's counter argument if you aren't going to make one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 17274 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 Im with Parky In the biblical sense?...cogratulations, but what do your wives and kids think??!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35083 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 Wouldn't that be 'I know Parky'? I was thinking more along the lines of one of these: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 (edited) So is E.T. I'd like to see Parky's counter argument if you aren't going to make one. Errr I want us to stop playing stone age football. In that formation the mf become a 5 when you lose the ball. And you lose the ball less. The three behind the two protect the flanks and the one protects the middle with the front two dropping back to help out. Less running, shorter passing and less panic. Without the ball........... .......Marv..................Hatem..... ...... I ...... ......... ....... I ...... I ..... ... ...............I ........V........................V <---------Anita . I Cabaye---------> ........................I .......................V .....................Tiote............. Edited December 14, 2012 by Park Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7030 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 The other team can pass the ball into space a hell of a lot quicker then players can run into new positions to cover. That's about as basic as you can get in football Parky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 (edited) The other team can pass the ball into space a hell of a lot quicker then players can run into new positions to cover. That's about as basic as you can get in football Parky So, all those millions of chalk board talks by managers are redundant. The ball is faster forget it lads. What spaces? You arrange to the first pass of their attacking phase. Arrigo Sacchi AC Milan. You might remember him. The way we defend now players are getting isolated because none of the midfield apart from Tiote (who has to be everyehere) knows what their responsabilities are. (Hatem and Guti track back haphazardly). If their first pass is long then the def is responsible. If it's short than the midfield close down. It's about tempo and zones. What we play now is about neither. What we play now ALLOWS A HUGE amount of space in our midfield which means sides come onto us utilising 2 defenders as well as the whole oof thier midfield. Edited December 14, 2012 by Park Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CleeToonFan 1 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 Zonal marking in that situation would leave gaping holes meaning there would be more pressures on the defence. There's a reason no team plays like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15531 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 And there's definitely a reason no team involving Mike Williamson plays like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lake Bells tits 1 Posted December 14, 2012 Share Posted December 14, 2012 Just look at how the usually inferior teams to us move when passing, its week 1 in manager college yet Pardew must have turned up a week late - possibly due to taking the principals wife on a holiday for a fortnight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.403f4a475ac3bb53997c2626c09ef800.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now