Tooj 17 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 A Tory and a "wait and see policy" before wanking over Ben Arfa was too much for them. Shame really as the majority of them seem to have the same sensible football views as me. By "wait and see policy" you mean your agenda yes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 QPR, Reading, Southampton and Sunderland have sacked their managers this season and there is a disturbingly high proportion of Newcastle fans who want us to be part of that group. For CT to cast this as the 'sensible' constituency of our supporters should be him crafting wummery out of a polarised discussion but its not. It's just self-delusion unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4711 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 (edited) By "wait and see policy" you mean your agenda yes? Agenda Its just football and opinions man. You and a few others seem insistent on making EVERYTHING an agenda or personal. Lots of us diasagree about all sorts to do with Newcastle and players, thats just the way it is. Having a debate about it is fine but honestly it all gets a bit silly at times. Edited March 31, 2013 by Christmas Tree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4711 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 (edited) QPR, Reading, Southampton and Sunderland have sacked their managers this season and there is a disturbingly high proportion of Newcastle fans who want us to be part of that group. For CT to cast this as the 'sensible' constituency of our supporters should be him crafting wummery out of a polarised discussion but its not. It's just self-delusion unfortunately. Well that makes sense. A "high proportion" consider Pardew not fit for purpose yet I'm a wum for agreeing with that high proprtion? Does that make you part of an elitist minority? Edited March 31, 2013 by Christmas Tree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14011 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Just because the numbers are high doesn't mean they aren't fucking idiots of a ''high proportion''. Come on man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 (edited) Statistically, 50% of football fans are below average intelligence. Disturbingly high could mean more than 1%. Don't try and outwit me fatty. Edited March 31, 2013 by ChezGiven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21393 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Tbf, CT has never advocated binning Pardew this season, has he? Also, he simply doesn't realise or understand he is agenda driven. Unbiased Tory etc. Not necessarily dishonest, just ignorant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14011 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Yes - CT has advocated sacking Pardew from early November. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10779 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Totally idiotic and pompous as well .......... just because you prefer a certain player in a certain position, when Pardew picks someone else, doesn't mean he's not a first team player. Taylor IIRC was first choice, in the first match, before the injuries & suspensions kicked in. So was Simpson, I reckon, and Gutierrez has been played in yesterday's position before. You seem to have some fantasy that your preferred players ARE the first team and not what the club puts out. If you truly believe that NUFC only had 4 first team players on the pitch you're either deluded or stupid. I'll go for plan B. Taylor was 1st choice before Mbiwa was signed, Simpson was 1st choice before Debuchy was signed, Jonas was 1st choice before Gouff... are you sensing a theme? If you believe the team that took the field against Man City would be our 1st choice team you're stupid. There is no option B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banshee 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 (edited) Taylor was 1st choice before Mbiwa was signed, Simpson was 1st choice before Debuchy was signed, Jonas was 1st choice before Gouff... are you sensing a theme? If you believe the team that took the field against Man City would be our 1st choice team you're stupid. There is no option B. You're talking shite man, you even contradict yersel. You stated 'we only had FOUR first team players out yesterday' then name FIVE of those, who played, in your 'first team'. Our 1st team would be something like Krul Debuchy Mbwia Colo Santon Tiote Sissoko Cabaye HBA -----------------Gouffran Cisse Absolute drivel and you still can't see it can you Edited March 31, 2013 by Banshee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10779 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 You're right! That it's five and not four makes all the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banshee 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 (edited) You're right! That it's five and not four makes all the difference. It means you were talking shite, as I said at the start, yet you chose to dish out your usual childish insults as if I'd care. No apology I see. Also to suggest Taylor isn't a first team player is laughably lame ....... you seem to be out of touch with the modern game, there's a huge difference between 'first team' and ' current first choice'. Do you still think in terms of 'wing halves, Brylcreem and first 11's Edited March 31, 2013 by Banshee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10779 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 It means you were talking shite, as I said at the start, yet you chose to dish out your usual childish insults as if I'd care. Also to suggest Taylor isn't a first team player is laughably lame ....... you seem to be out of touch with the modern game, there's a huge difference between 'first team' and ' current first choice'. Do you still think in terms of 'wing halves, Brylcreem and first 11's I think this is the problem; your ability to comprehend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banshee 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 (edited) I think this is the problem; your ability to comprehend. I can comprehend enough to realise you were taking shite when you said we had 4 first team players playing yesterday ........ you were wrong yet you still think you're right, amazing. Are you seriously saying Taylor & Gutierrez aren't first team players? Edited March 31, 2013 by Banshee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10779 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 I can comprehend enough to realise you were taking shite when you said we had 4 first team players playing yesterday ........ you were wrong yet you still think you're right, amazing. Are you saying Taylor & Gutierrez aren't first team players? I'm saying that the team that took the field against Man City was significantly weaker than our 1st choice team would be. You're trying (rather desperately) to fixate upon numbers or whether a player has, in the past, been a 1st team, while at the same time trying to blur the distinction between 1st team squad and 1st choice team. But you crack on sunshine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banshee 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 (edited) I'm saying that the team that took the field against Man City was significantly weaker than our 1st choice team would be. You're trying (rather desperately) to fixate upon numbers or whether a player has, in the past, been a 1st team, while at the same time trying to blur the distinction between 1st team squad and 1st choice team. But you crack on sunshine. No ....... what you were actually saying, pre back-peddling, was that we only had 4 first team players out yesterday. You were talking shite and also ignoring the likes of Taylor & Gutierrez because you were so proud to say 4 ........... what a numb argument as you've struggled, but eventually, admitted. The fact that your 1st choice team is different to the manager's seems irrelevant to you as it further destroys your pitiful argument. Edited March 31, 2013 by Banshee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Carr's Gloves 3859 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 No ....... what you were actually saying, pre back-peddling, was that we only had 4 first team players out yesterday. You were talking shite and also ignoring the likes of Taylor & Gutierrez because you were so proud to say 4 ........... what a numb argument as you've struggled, but eventually, admitted. The fact that your 1st choice team is different to the manager's seems irrelevant to you as it further destroys your pitiful argument. Do you think you are winning this argument? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banshee 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Do you think you are winning this argument? Well, the knacker said we had 4 first team players yesterday and then posts his 'first team' which has 5 of those who played yesterday. That's pretty conclusive or do you have another option? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44498 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Chill out kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10779 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 No ....... what you were actually saying, pre back-peddling, was that we only had 4 first team players out yesterday. You were talking shite and also ignoring the likes of Taylor & Gutierrez because you were so proud to say 4 ........... what a numb argument as you've struggled, but eventually, admitted. The fact that your 1st choice team is different to the manager's seems irrelevant to you as it further destroys your pitiful argument. "So proud" You do realise people are reading your nonsense, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banshee 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 (edited) "So proud" You do realise people are reading your nonsense, right? I was right, you were wrong ........... how can I be talking nonsense? Are you also saying Taylor & Gutierrez aren't first team players or that they're just not very good? Edited March 31, 2013 by Banshee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10779 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 I was right, you were wrong ........... how can I be talking nonsense? Are you also saying Taylor & Gutierrez aren't first team players or that they're just not very good? Do I really need to write this in words of one syllable? Go back and look at my 1st post in this thread, then tootle back here and apologise for being a nob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banshee 0 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 (edited) Do I really need to write this in words of one syllable? Go back and look at my 1st post in this thread, then tootle back here and apologise for being a nob. You were wrong and admitted it ...... try sticking your crayons up your sisters arse as you usually like to do Your 1st post said 3-0 to City and you were wrong about that as well by 1 ............ seems to be a theme there you silly man. Edited March 31, 2013 by Banshee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44498 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 You were wrong and admitted it ...... try sticking your crayons up your sisters arse as you like to do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Carr's Gloves 3859 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Well, the knacker said we had 4 first team players yesterday and then posts his 'first team' which has 5 of those who played yesterday. That's pretty conclusive or do you have another option? So your answer to my question is yes then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now