ADP 0 Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 What a bizarre article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10779 Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 To be fair, her sister did art at college (or whatever) and I had to be aware of a picture she did of the outlines of 5 men, which was (deliberately) placed at the end of her bed in her old place, so I think she's getting off lightly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 42129 Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 "Getting off lightly" Don't put yourself down, man. Fnarr fnarr etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10779 Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 "Getting off lightly" Don't put yourself down, man. Fnarr fnarr etc. As if I would. Wouldn't want to starve you lot of your sustenance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
essembeeofsunderland 811 Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 I'm so glad he admires my work ethic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 42129 Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 I'm so glad he admires my work ethic. Nurse! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMoog 0 Posted October 26, 2014 Share Posted October 26, 2014 Yay!!! Thank god we were all wrong about Mike Ashley, he's made our club a success again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trooper 940 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 http://www.themag.co.uk/the-mag-articles/mike-ashley-set-appoint-derek-llambias/ "His lawyers made it clear to the board there could be devastating repercussions for those who tried to stand in his way" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Kelly 1224 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 I'm sure there must be some logical reason why he could have took legal action if they hadn't accepted his offer but I can't see it in that article. I can't really see why Rangers would want to accept his offer at all if I'm honest. It just seems to be giving him control over their assets which blatently seems to be something he wants for his own purposes, rather than to benefit the club at all. Obviously they're in a pretty desperate financial position but each article I read suggests there are other people making offers too. Are they worse than him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Didn't King want to appoint the chairman, but Ashley only demanded to appoint chief exec and another role. Easdale stays as chairman in this set up, so it got the approval over the King offer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trooper 940 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/29783348 BBC Expecting Llambias being named as Chief Executive of Rangers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Kelly 1224 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 Didn't King want to appoint the chairman, but Ashley only demanded to appoint chief exec and another role. Easdale stays as chairman in this set up, so it got the approval over the King offer. Ah so basically Ashley's got in with the Chairman and he's pushed it Asheleys way to keep his job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 9737 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/29783348 BBC Expecting Llambias being named as Chief Executive of Rangers It's always good to see a cock in charge of cunts tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClubSpinDoctor 0 Posted October 27, 2014 Share Posted October 27, 2014 It's always good to see a cock in charge of cunts tbh. Sexist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 There's few clubs in the world deserve Ashley more than Rangers. I'd be delighted if he sold us and bought them 100%. He is made for them, fat alcoholic cunt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30371 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 He has loaned Rangers a further £1m and they've come out and said that they're still going to need further finance before the end of the year. I can only see this going one way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 32827 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 I'm worried he'll end up having his Rangers cake and still get to eat his NUFC one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30371 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Would Ashley owning Rangers have a negative impact on us? It offers us the possibility of using Rangers as a feeder club, sending our young players there for first team experience, possibly picking off their better players at decent prices? More than likely I can't see it making a much difference to his running of NUFC, can it get much worse for us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10779 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Would Ashley owning Rangers have a negative impact on us? It offers us the possibility of using Rangers as a feeder club, sending our young players there for first team experience, possibly picking off their better players at decent prices? More than likely I can't see it making a much difference to his running of NUFC, can it get much worse for us? I'd rather not be associated with the club, but that's an ethical/emotional reason. Ashley's interests in football are purely business, so no I can't see his ownership of Rangers having an effect on us beyond pre-season friendlies and somewhere to send the kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 I'd rather not be associated with the club, but that's an ethical/emotional reason. Ashley's interests in football are purely business, so no I can't see his ownership of Rangers having an effect on us beyond pre-season friendlies and somewhere to send the kids. If they and we qualify for Europa (stop laughing), he has a conflict which is not allowed. My assumtion is he will have Sports Direct on their shirts soon, because it's the only advertising allowed in european games outside of official partners so his stadium adverts would get covered up. That being the case, I have a nagging fear he would withdraw NUFC from the competition to avoid the conflict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10779 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 If they and we qualify for Europa (stop laughing), he has a conflict which is not allowed. My assumtion is he will have Sports Direct on their shirts soon, because it's the only advertising allowed in european games outside of official partners so his stadium adverts would get covered up. That being the case, I have a nagging fear he would withdraw NUFC from the competition to avoid the conflict. Don't the owners of Watford and Udinese (? I think) have the same issue though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30371 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 (edited) Yeah but Watford are unlikely to qualify for the EL any time soon. As part of an agreement with the SFA he isn't allowed to own more than 10% of Rangers while he owns Newcastle. He's currently handing money to a business that is continuing to lose money with little prospect of them repaying him. At first glance this is very poor business practice. However, I reckon that when Rangers fail to repay him what he is owed the club and SFA will both agree to him accepting capital in the club in lieu of his cash and that is how he'll take majority control. Edited November 12, 2014 by ewerk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10779 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Can't see him relinquishing control of Newcastle any time soon, so won't he simply use the dissolution of Rangers (again) as a threat to cow the SFA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30371 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Aye, that's pretty much the tactic I can see him adopting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10779 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 I think he can rely on the likelihood that Newcastle won't get into Europe. We'd either need a cup victory, which is laughable, or gaining access via the league which, in the current model, is just as laughable. How many spots go to England now? 6? I cannot see it being an issue we need to face any time soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.403f4a475ac3bb53997c2626c09ef800.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now