Craig 6682 Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 7 minutes ago, Howay said: Aye that’s it, how would a court ever uphold an agreement that was essentially worthless? He clearly entered into that clause in bad faith by presenting it as a sponsorship when it absolutely was not, the new owners accepted at face value that it was a sponsorship (no matter how low paid) with the little due diligence Ashley allowed them and then discovered in actuality there was no sponsorship. So either, as Craig noted, there was a contract that had payment stipulations and by not paying it the sponsor was in breach, or he misrepresented the use of signage as a sponsorship. The comments from her that he’s alleging are insulting towards him btw he’s pathetic. I hope she counter sues and they proceed to employ some forensic accountants to go through the entirety of his ownership to find any other misrepresentations he’s made and sue the cunt for those as well. But Gemmill's too busy posting on here to do that shit, man! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 9761 Posted June 11, 2022 Share Posted June 11, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougle 3329 Posted June 11, 2022 Share Posted June 11, 2022 “Darby Carnty? Yeah buy em for a quid and save money on the tie” 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 9761 Posted June 11, 2022 Share Posted June 11, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohhh_yeah 2964 Posted June 17, 2022 Share Posted June 17, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 13857 Posted June 17, 2022 Share Posted June 17, 2022 How many High Court cases does this fat cunt want? I see the one he launched against our owners went nowhere fast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35060 Posted June 17, 2022 Share Posted June 17, 2022 I like how he’s destined to lose most of them due to scrimping on the cost of lawyers 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonatine 11361 Posted June 17, 2022 Share Posted June 17, 2022 12 minutes ago, Alex said: I like how he’s destined to lose most of them due to scrimping on the cost of lawyers 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohhh_yeah 2964 Posted June 19, 2022 Share Posted June 19, 2022 https://www.rangersnews.uk/columnist/mike-ashley-newcastle-stunt-raises-more-questions-over-rangers-castore-deal/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonatine 11361 Posted December 5, 2022 Share Posted December 5, 2022 Still a cunt it would seem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44804 Posted December 5, 2022 Share Posted December 5, 2022 Someone will kill that fucker one day. He's a Grade A Non-Sexy Boy. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougle 3329 Posted December 5, 2022 Share Posted December 5, 2022 Can the thread title not just be changed to 'Cunt' we'd all know what/who it was about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebrokendoll 9188 Posted December 5, 2022 Share Posted December 5, 2022 50 minutes ago, Dougle said: Can the thread title not just be changed to 'Cunt' we'd all know what/who it was about. a reasonable shout that I reckon. I also think the title is inaccurate, because ashley, like thatcher, is so repulsive that even after they've lost the ability to have an immediate impact on your life they remain colossal cunts. like thatcher too I'll still hate fat cunt long after he's taken his final gasps of breath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 9761 Posted December 5, 2022 Share Posted December 5, 2022 1 hour ago, Dougle said: Can the thread title not just be changed to 'Cunt' we'd all know what/who it was about. Sure, but how would PL cope with thinking it’s an entire thread just about him? 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10849 Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 On 26/03/2013 at 09:29, Christmas Tree said: So this is going to be the week when Mike Ashley can rightly say he is getting the hang of this football lark. European ties against the likes of Benfica in April A transfer / wage system that works A squad that just keeps getting better Great season ticket deals for fans And a profit making football club And all this before the the big bucks TV money rolls in. Of course it hasn't been delivered without pain, but few revolutions are smooth. We will rightly hear all sorts of praise for dynamic duo this week and once again our club will be heralded as the blue print for most clubs to follow. So where now? What about the next few years? How can we as a club take advantage of this solid foundation and become a regular top four challenger? Personally I think we'll have a few rough years ahead before he finally fully understands what's needed and appoints someone like Benitez. Evergreen post. 1 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 33121 Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 1 hour ago, The Fish said: Evergreen post. 'If toontastic lasts for a thousand years, men will still say, this was CT's finest hour.' 1 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Whitehurst 895 Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 Reliably informed that this is something Ashley was keen on when he was looking for buyers for us. He was trying to sell the club as an operating company but wanted to own the stadium and charge the operating company to use the stadium. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 9 minutes ago, Billy Whitehurst said: Reliably informed that this is something Ashley was keen on when he was looking for buyers for us. He was trying to sell the club as an operating company but wanted to own the stadium and charge the operating company to use the stadium. Remember when he had a go at the city council because they wouldn't change the road signs to say 'Sports Direct Arena' instead of 'St. James' Park'? I think the line was something like "You can call your building whatever you please, the land it sits up is leased from the council and is called St. James' Park. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2204 Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 8 hours ago, Billy Whitehurst said: Reliably informed that this is something Ashley was keen on when he was looking for buyers for us. He was trying to sell the club as an operating company but wanted to own the stadium and charge the operating company to use the stadium. Thank fuck for that. Look at what a cunt he was at Rangers when he still had his chubby hooks into their commercial rights. I couldn’t think of a worse landlord for the club (with the possible exception of Steve Bruce) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 33121 Posted December 8, 2022 Share Posted December 8, 2022 18 hours ago, Billy Whitehurst said: Reliably informed that this is something Ashley was keen on when he was looking for buyers for us. He was trying to sell the club as an operating company but wanted to own the stadium and charge the operating company to use the stadium. Heard this too and similar. Wanted cash for the club but he still wanted to keep money making parts of it. Whey aye, Mike, cracking deal that. Here's your £250m and keep the change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35060 Posted December 8, 2022 Share Posted December 8, 2022 The best bit was the sports direct signs coming down after, having agreed to the sponsorship continuing, the owners discovered it was free advertising. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted December 8, 2022 Share Posted December 8, 2022 4 minutes ago, Alex said: The best bit was the sports direct signs coming down after, having agreed to the sponsorship continuing, the owners discovered it was free advertising. What I think he took more offence to was when Staveley stated she wanted to take imagery within the ground without THAT logo being in shot. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35060 Posted December 8, 2022 Share Posted December 8, 2022 Oh, aye. He can’t take any criticism. That’s how we ended up with most of the managers we did 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 9761 Posted March 16, 2023 Share Posted March 16, 2023 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35060 Posted March 16, 2023 Share Posted March 16, 2023 Well it’s not moving I suppose 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.403f4a475ac3bb53997c2626c09ef800.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now