Mike Ashley -- Irrelevant Cunt

[Rayvin 5227]

All these people who talk about stability and so on, what do they think the sport is actually about? Because it really seems that for some of them, it really isn't about being competitive and improving. I mean ok Steve Howey, we're stable but... so? How is being 'stable' any better than being relegated in the overall scheme of things? Not sure I can see much difference between perpetual 17th and yoyoing between the Championship and the PL.

 

You could in fact argue that the latter would be more satisfying.

[David Kelly 1245]

That wouldn't take much of an argument tbh.  These last two seasons in particular have been purgatory.  I can't see there being many supporters who wouldn't rather have the entertainment of a promotion ahead of this shit all the time.  Even if it does by definition mean that we'd have to have some relegations to.

[ewerk 30680]

If anything the Saudis might give us too much money. 

[The Fish 10876]

1 hour ago, Rayvin said:

All these people who talk about stability and so on, what do they think the sport is actually about? Because it really seems that for some of them, it really isn't about being competitive and improving. I mean ok Steve Howey, we're stable but... so? How is being 'stable' any better than being relegated in the overall scheme of things? Not sure I can see much difference between perpetual 17th and yoyoing between the Championship and the PL.

 

You could in fact argue that the latter would be more satisfying.

More about financial security, isn't it?

 

I mean, on the face of it, the Saudi takeover may turn us into a financial powerhouse, or something could go horribly wrong and they could leave us crippled with debt and facing administration.

 

Don't think Howey's suggesting two relegations and tumultuous relationship with the fans is stability. 

[Alex 35120]

I think he is. He’s thick enough to have forgotten about it

[Howay 12496]

He should stick to posting pictures of his lass doing pole dancing classes the knacker. 
 

It’s a completely shit argument, a group that are clearly ambitious buying us would likely have us more stable than Ashley’s Newcastle. Could it go tits up? Of course there’s a chance but to argue against it on that basis is like saying don’t bother leaving your house as you might get into an accident, we’re no longer a football club under Ashley’s ownership. 

Edited April 27, 2021 by Howay

[Monkeys Fist 42484]

1 hour ago, Howay said:

He should stick to posting pictures of his lass doing pole dancing classes the knacker. 

That’s a terrible slur on the poor dunce, and you should, for legal reasons, back up your awful accusations with, at the very least, a link to said pictures. 
Allegedly. 
 

[Kevin Carr's Gloves 3905]

So the Ruben brothers are massive Tory donors. Well tgey can fuck off from buying the club. I’d rather just have the Isis donors.

[Monkeys Fist 42484]

 

4 minutes ago, Kevin Carr's Gloves said:

So the Ruben brothers are massive Tory donors. Well tgey can fuck off from buying the club. I’d rather just have the Isis donors.

Whilst I agree with the sentiment, I’m pretty sure Fat Lad Mike isn’t voting Labour anytime soon. 
I’ve reconciled myself with the idea that if  we must have cunts owning our club, let’s have the worlds biggest, richest cunts. 

[Kevin Carr's Gloves 3905]

8 hours ago, Monkeys Fist said:

 

Whilst I agree with the sentiment, I’m pretty sure Fat Lad Mike isn’t voting Labour anytime soon. 
I’ve reconciled myself with the idea that if  we must have cunts owning our club, let’s have the worlds biggest, richest cunts. 

I meant I’d rather the Saudis owned on their own.

[Dr Gloom 21965]

Because the Saudis are less despicable than the Tories? 

[Kevin Carr's Gloves 3905]

7 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said:

Because the Saudis are less despicable than the Tories? 

Yes, they’re totally upfront about being their atrocities. The Tories are just as cunty and try and look innocent about it.

[Dr Gloom 21965]

Tories are generally awful people but at least they don’t stone homosexuals or heretics to death. Bring up front about those things doesn’t make them palatable 

[Kevin Carr's Gloves 3905]

Just now, Dr Gloom said:

Tories are generally awful people but at least they don’t stone homosexuals or heretics to death. Bring up front about those things doesn’t make them palatable 

What about starving poor people to death? 

[Dr Gloom 21965]

2 minutes ago, Kevin Carr's Gloves said:

What about starving poor people to death? 

The Saudis have got that covered too. 

[ewerk 30680]

'I mean public beheadings and executing journalists is one thing but a policy of austerity is just too much.'

[Monkeys Fist 42484]

41 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said:

Tories are generally awful people but at least they don’t stone homosexuals or heretics to death. Bring up front about those things doesn’t make them palatable 

They fucking would if they thought they could make a profit out of it.  

[The Fish 10876]

The Saudis would definitely be Tories. To be honest, they'd be UKIP/BNP, so I'm not sure what the issue is?

[David Kelly 1245]

18 hours ago, Howay said:

He should stick to posting pictures of his lass doing pole dancing classes the knacker. 
 

It’s a completely shit argument, a group that are clearly ambitious buying us would likely have us more stable than Ashley’s Newcastle. Could it go tits up? Of course there’s a chance but to argue against it on that basis is like saying don’t bother leaving your house as you might get into an accident, we’re no longer a football club under Ashley’s ownership. 

It would actually be more like not going out on a date with a gagging for it Salma Hayek for fear you might get into an accident on the way.

[Monkeys Fist 42484]

2 hours ago, David Kelly said:

a gagging for it Salma Hayek

Is there any other kind of Salma Hayek? 

[Isegrim 9803]

9 hours ago, Dr Gloom said:

Tories are generally awful people but at least they don’t stone homosexuals or heretics to death. Bring up front about those things doesn’t make them palatable 

Are you sure about Priti Patel’s policies?

[thebrokendoll 9256]

1 hour ago, Monkeys Fist said:

Is there any other kind of Salma Hayek? 

 

I'd like to think not, especially if she was in my company.

[Monkeys Fist 42484]

31 minutes ago, thebrokendoll said:

 

I'd like to think not, especially if she was in my company.

Back of the queue there Bumpkin Bollocks. 

[thebrokendoll 9256]

1 hour ago, Monkeys Fist said:

Back of the queue there Bumpkin Bollocks. 

 

every time desperado pops up on the tv menu in our house we watch it. the wife thinks it's pathetic, she doesn't understand I just appreciate salma for her acting abilities. mind you, the same applies to patricia arquette, cracking little actress. we've watched true romance about 25 times as well.

[David Kelly 1245]

Dusk Till Dawn is never off my telly.