Craig 6700 Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Just been on SSN that Everton are interested in him but in an interview with a reporter from L'Equipe, it was suggested that he wouldn't be interested. The bloke did say that Anelka would be interested in a move to Newcastle and that it wouldn't take much to persuade him to sign. What are people's opinions? A worthy successor to Shearer? He's already played alongside Owen in the past... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock Manson 0 Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 If we couldn't get him in the summer, what chance do we have now? Would be a good signing, knows where the net is and has premiership experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6700 Posted January 10, 2006 Author Share Posted January 10, 2006 I think there are a couple of differences from the summer: 1. We pulled out of the deal so that we could get Owen. 2. Anelka now actively wants the move 3. Fenerbache are reportedly prepared to sell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mags 1 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 IF he got him, another Bellamy? The man has a very touchy reputation but no doubt can get the goals when it suits him. This one has me very perplexed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammynb 3508 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 When he was on loan at pool iirc he and Owen were a lethal pairing up front. They obviously have a ability to work together, which can't be said about a lot of people and Anelka so by rights it shouldn't take to long for them to rekindle their partnership. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Kelly 1260 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 His bad temprament from his early years doesn't seem to have surfaced for quite a while now (although I'm sure Souness could remedy that) and if I remember correctly Keegan said he had no bother with him at all at Citeh. He is a quality player who knows where the net is and I think he could play with any of our other strikers. He could also bring the added bonus of being a bit of a target up top without being the physical presence of Al. This would surely force us to actually playing some football instead of useless long balls. If we did go for him it would raise some serious doubts about Luque's future. While he hasn't been fantastic anywhere he's certainly looked much more effective up top than on the wing. So what would we do with him if we signed Anelka? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 His bad temprament from his early years doesn't seem to have surfaced for quite a while now (although I'm sure Souness could remedy that) and if I remember correctly Keegan said he had no bother with him at all at Citeh.He is a quality player who knows where the net is and I think he could play with any of our other strikers. He could also bring the added bonus of being a bit of a target up top without being the physical presence of Al. This would surely force us to actually playing some football instead of useless long balls. If we did go for him it would raise some serious doubts about Luque's future. While he hasn't been fantastic anywhere he's certainly looked much more effective up top than on the wing. So what would we do with him if we signed Anelka? 77297[/snapback] Would mean Owen can then sign for Liverpool in summer like we all expect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Kelly 1260 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Aye, good point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetleftpeg 0 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 He changes clubs more regularly than Tiger Woods. How long before he gets bored here and gets his brothers to move him somewhere else? I said in the summer that Souness would be a hypocrite signing Anelka after what he said about 'proper' players and the Bellamy situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Surely if we did sign Anelka then someone would have to be sold to pay for it?? What were Fenerbahce (sp) asking, around £7m? Luque hasn't been here long enough to be sold again which, would leave us with who??? Got it, swap him for Ameobi! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scunnytom 0 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 His bad temprament from his early years doesn't seem to have surfaced for quite a while now (although I'm sure Souness could remedy that) and if I remember correctly Keegan said he had no bother with him at all at Citeh.He is a quality player who knows where the net is and I think he could play with any of our other strikers. He could also bring the added bonus of being a bit of a target up top without being the physical presence of Al. This would surely force us to actually playing some football instead of useless long balls. If we did go for him it would raise some serious doubts about Luque's future. While he hasn't been fantastic anywhere he's certainly looked much more effective up top than on the wing. So what would we do with him if we signed Anelka? 77297[/snapback] If your losing shearer wont you want luque as well as anelka Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 22001 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Just been on SSN that Everton are interested in him but in an interview with a reporter from L'Equipe, it was suggested that he wouldn't be interested. The bloke did say that Anelka would be interested in a move to Newcastle and that it wouldn't take much to persuade him to sign. What are people's opinions? A worthy successor to Shearer? He's already played alongside Owen in the past... 77268[/snapback] Don't be stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6700 Posted January 11, 2006 Author Share Posted January 11, 2006 Just been on SSN that Everton are interested in him but in an interview with a reporter from L'Equipe, it was suggested that he wouldn't be interested. The bloke did say that Anelka would be interested in a move to Newcastle and that it wouldn't take much to persuade him to sign. What are people's opinions? A worthy successor to Shearer? He's already played alongside Owen in the past... 77268[/snapback] Don't be stupid. 77329[/snapback] It was a question, not a suggestion.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 22001 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Just been on SSN that Everton are interested in him but in an interview with a reporter from L'Equipe, it was suggested that he wouldn't be interested. The bloke did say that Anelka would be interested in a move to Newcastle and that it wouldn't take much to persuade him to sign. What are people's opinions? A worthy successor to Shearer? He's already played alongside Owen in the past... 77268[/snapback] Don't be stupid. 77329[/snapback] It was a question, not a suggestion.... 77330[/snapback] A stupid question though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Kelly 1260 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 His bad temprament from his early years doesn't seem to have surfaced for quite a while now (although I'm sure Souness could remedy that) and if I remember correctly Keegan said he had no bother with him at all at Citeh.He is a quality player who knows where the net is and I think he could play with any of our other strikers. He could also bring the added bonus of being a bit of a target up top without being the physical presence of Al. This would surely force us to actually playing some football instead of useless long balls. If we did go for him it would raise some serious doubts about Luque's future. While he hasn't been fantastic anywhere he's certainly looked much more effective up top than on the wing. So what would we do with him if we signed Anelka? 77297[/snapback] If your losing shearer wont you want luque as well as anelka 77323[/snapback] Fair point but then we would have to find a way to keep the three of them happy, something we have failed to do properly in the past. Although if you take Shearer's guaranteed starting position out of the mix then we might have a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckypierre 0 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 When he was on loan at pool iirc he and Owen were a lethal pairing up front. They obviously have a ability to work together, which can't be said about a lot of people and Anelka so by rights it shouldn't take to long for them to rekindle their partnership. 77289[/snapback] Could well be wrong but I thought the genreal consensus was that him and Owen werent that a good a partnership at Liverpool and the fact they didnt click was one of the reasons why Houllier didnt sign him permanently.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 5 goals in 22 games at the Scouse.... not the best is it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 5 goals in 22 games at the Scouse.... not the best is it 77334[/snapback] Compared to Ameobi, Chopra and Shearer put together in the last 22 games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scunnytom 0 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 (edited) Would his attitude not clash with Souness, Bigtime? Edited January 11, 2006 by Scunnytom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock Manson 0 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Would his attitude not clash with Souness, Bigtime? 77341[/snapback] Hopefully he wont be here for much longer. So shouldn't the question be, "would his attitude not clash with Bruce, Bigtime?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammynb 3508 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 5 goals in 22 games at the Scouse.... not the best is it 77334[/snapback] Maybe but wasn't their partnership the reverse of Bellars and Shearer? Anelka was the runner and Owen the finisher. And Houllier didn't sign him for other reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 5 goals in 22 games at the Scouse.... not the best is it 77334[/snapback] Maybe but wasn't their partnership the reverse of Bellars and Shearer? Anelka was the runner and Owen the finisher. And Houllier didn't sign him for other reasons. 77851[/snapback] To be honest for me his goal scoring record since leaving Arsenal is not the best Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock Manson 0 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 5 goals in 22 games at the Scouse.... not the best is it 77334[/snapback] Maybe but wasn't their partnership the reverse of Bellars and Shearer? Anelka was the runner and Owen the finisher. And Houllier didn't sign him for other reasons. 77851[/snapback] To be honest for me his goal scoring record since leaving Arsenal is not the best 77853[/snapback] It's certainly better than any of our current strikers are managing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now