Jump to content

Europe --- In or Out


Christmas Tree
 Share

Europe?  

92 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

 

Tbf, this is completely true. But with her position being what it was, I don't think it would have made sense for Labour to enter into an early cross party solution with her.

Before the snap election her position looked quite secure. As I said at the time, she could have framed her invitation to him in terms of national unity and shamed him into accepting it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ewerk said:

Before the snap election her position looked quite secure. As I said at the time, she could have framed her invitation to him in terms of national unity and shamed him into accepting it.

 

Does shame work on Corbyn? :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it's possible that May is doing this to ratchet up pressure on the ERG and DUP though. Threaten them with a Soft Brexit and see if they return.

Edited by Rayvin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ewerk said:

Why do you think he’s now meeting with her?

 

Because she's fucked and he can see that? Because it doesn't do him any harm and has a lot of potential upsides for Labour?

 

It's certainly not because she shamed him. I mean he walked out of the last meeting and has refused to meet her previously I believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, ewerk said:

Before the snap election her position looked quite secure. As I said at the time, she could have framed her invitation to him in terms of national unity and shamed him into accepting it.

Tbf they did have withdrawing from the CU and SM in their GE manifesto so I don't think she was ever leaning towards a soft-ish position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

 

Because she's fucked and he can see that? Because it doesn't do him any harm and has a lot of potential upsides for Labour?

 

It's certainly not because she shamed him. I mean he walked out of the last meeting and has refused to meet her previously I believe.

He refused to meet her previously and took a lot of flak for it.

His walk out the other week was to do with the presence of Umuna. He met with her one on one hours later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, NJS said:

Tbf they did have withdrawing from the CU and SM in their GE manifesto so I don't think she was ever leaning towards a soft-ish position. 

Yeah, that was based on her getting a thumping majority. It was a gross miscalculation. It's only recently dawned on her that she perhaps needs to chase what she can get through rather than what she wants to get through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gemmill said:

Aye. Looking like a stitch up. Fortunately he'll have Starmer in the room to sniff it out. 

 

Corbyn should feign flu. Watson and Starmer to arrive with a sick note and take it from there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ewerk said:

@Kevin Carr's Gloves pretty much called me insane two years ago when I suggested that Labour and the Tories should work together on a deal that could please both parties. It could have saved a lot of time and hassle if the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom had listened to me then.

 

I still think it’s insane for Labour but that’s where we’re at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's taking Rebecca Long-Bailey with him to see May (as well as Starmer and Brown). Pretty sure she's anti-PV so not looking good on that front. She's not impressive in debates either tbh. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the signs are starting to look like we might get out of this with a PV or election...

 

Merkel has just indirectly signalled that the EU shouldn't give us a short extension. May has just made clear that EU elections are on the table if the EU insist on a long extension. Government supposedly ready to back Cooper's bill in some form.

 

EDIT - Apparently not on the last point, although still, I think we're looking at a long extension.

Edited by Rayvin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.