Jump to content

Red bull(shit) stratos record.


wolfy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Primarily made of glass. That's a beauty. I suggest you watch how the towers were built and maybe that might shed some light on your thoughts.

 

Oh and good luck flying a 767.. 800 feet above sea level at 500mph.

 

It's pretty tricky I'd imagine, you might hit a building or something. Or flyover and make people think you hit a building.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 859
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If a building explodes as high up as that, anyone looking up would see an explosion obviously. They can walk about and say, it just exploded, it just blew up and try and figure out why.

 

When a media mob descends into the streets telling them all that it was a plane and then showing the footage later on the TV, most people will assume it was a plane even though they know , no plane hit anything.

 

It's manipulation/brainwashing at it's best.

 

Do you believe you could be so easily brainwashed? I think ironically you are the only forum member who could be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: He honestly think THEY have got Men In Black style brainwashers out there.

 

You honestly believe this don't you Wolfy, you honestly believe there's a huge conspiracy where THEY've managed to dupe everyone on the planet bar you and your merry band. All those thousands of enquiring minds, those scientists, those geniuses, those brilliant men and women across the globe, ALL duped, yet you scream alone, a lonely band of brothers. Railing against those you feel are blind, privy to the TRUTH, while the rest of the planet are blind, deaf or stupid.

 

Good grief :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: In your empty head, this was the equivalent of someone throwing a drinking straw at a wall.

Nope. It is the equivalent of someone shooting a roll of aluminium foil at a wall at speed. I wonder if it would penetrate right through....hmmmmm.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Common sense theory? You're not employing common sense, you're employing fanatical bastardisation of the truth. I'll bet you were absent-mindedly kicking a coke can, it hit a wall and you had a eureka! moment. 'Hey, this aluminium can can't penetrate this wall...they LIED to us! I know this.'

 

Do you know the main culprit in the brainwashing of the eye witnesses into believing a plane hit a tower? The plane that hit the tower.

The media.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Primarily made of glass. That's a beauty. I suggest you watch how the towers were built and maybe that might shed some light on your thoughts.

 

Oh and good luck flying a 767.. 800 feet above sea level at 500mph.

 

I feel dirty that ive even responded this much thus far. I hope you get banned. Youre bringing this place down with all your shite and contribute zero to the football side of things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would who go to all that trouble?

 

Anyone! Anyone faking shit like jumping from space or whatever.

 

I'm sure you think the hadron collider is fake as well. How about dinosaurs? Jet packs? Apples that taste of cucumber?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: There's only one person round here that's been brainwashed, and it's you. And not by the might of the world's leading superpower and its media lapdog. No, by some fella on a message board who wasn't even there when all of this happened, telling you utterly unbelievable tales about exploding buildings and the greatest optical illusion/mass brainwashing of all time. And you're there nodding your head. Who's been brainwashed,you gormless tit?

There was no great optical illusion, it was merely rigged up fake footage displayed on a TV screen being passed of as NEWS FACT.

 

Nothing great about it, as the footage was absolutely crap. Camera technology is 2001 was fantastic , especially news cameras as they make sure they capture the scenes, unless it's faked, then all of a sudden, those fantastic cameras end up with cataracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: There's only one person round here that's been brainwashed, and it's you. And not by the might of the world's leading superpower and its media lapdog. No, by some fella on a message board who wasn't even there when all of this happened, telling you utterly unbelievable tales about exploding buildings and the greatest optical illusion/mass brainwashing of all time. And you're there nodding your head. Who's been brainwashed,you gormless tit?

I'm falling for you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was almost right!

 

It's not like that at all you cosmic cretin.

Is that right. So what's your idea of a plane, as I am under the impression they are basically hollow tubes with wings. I'm fairly certain they aren't solid.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel dirty that ive even responded this much thus far. I hope you get banned. Youre bringing this place down with all your shite and contribute zero to the football side of things

You can duck out at any time, put me on ignore, I'm not good for your health. Do it now, you are losing it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you believe you could be so easily brainwashed? I think ironically you are the only forum member who could be.

I could be duped, even to this day but it would take some effort to do, because I question everything.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was no great optical illusion, it was merely rigged up fake footage displayed on a TV screen being passed of as NEWS FACT.

 

Nothing great about it, as the footage was absolutely crap. Camera technology is 2001 was fantastic , especially news cameras as they make sure they capture the scenes, unless it's faked, then all of a sudden, those fantastic cameras end up with cataracts.

 

As Brock said previously, if the camerawork is clear it's obviously faked, if the camera work is grainy it's obviously faked. You can't even see how idiotic this stance is, can you?

 

You're stating (as fact by the way):

  • That hundreds of people were immediately convinced that there was a plane where they previously had seen none.
  • That All the media outlets on the planet that showed the live footage of the 2nd plane striking the building are in on the cover-up
  • That THEY felt their agenda was furthered better by creating the most convoluted and complicated cover-up in history, instead of just saying that terrorists blew up the building from within. As if people give a shit that it was planes, rather than bombs. I mean surely if THEIR agenda was to affect air travel/companies/freedom/whatever, why not attack airports simultaneously? Far less need for incredible cover-ups there.

What else am I missing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that right. So what's your idea of a plane, as I am under the impression they are basically hollow tubes with wings. I'm fairly certain they aren't solid.

You're thinking about those Jellycopters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone! Anyone faking shit like jumping from space or whatever.

 

I'm sure you think the hadron collider is fake as well. How about dinosaurs? Jet packs? Apples that taste of cucumber?

The Hadron Collider, whatever it does, does not interest me. Jet packs , maybe a few seconds of flying or minutes. Dinosaurs, bullshit in how we are told, as in Tyrannosaurus Rex and the likes. If I taste an apple and it tastes like cucumber ,I'll go with that.

 

Saying that, I was once asked to taste an apple which I was told tastes like a vagina and I admit I was sceptical, so I took a bite and was nearly sick as it tasted like shit.

I was told to 'turn it round a bit.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are still hollow. The building weighed a tad more than that don't you think.

 

It doesnt matter if its hollow. Doesnt make the weight any lighter when it hit. Yes the building weighs more, thats why it didnt topple over genius.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Brock said previously, if the camerawork is clear it's obviously faked, if the camera work is grainy it's obviously faked. You can't even see how idiotic this stance is, can you?

 

You're stating (as fact by the way):

  • That hundreds of people were immediately convinced that there was a plane where they previously had seen none.
  • That All the media outlets on the planet that showed the live footage of the 2nd plane striking the building are in on the cover-up
  • That THEY felt their agenda was furthered better by creating the most convoluted and complicated cover-up in history, instead of just saying that terrorists blew up the building from within. As if people give a shit that it was planes, rather than bombs. I mean surely if THEIR agenda was to affect air travel/companies/freedom/whatever, why not attack airports simultaneously? Far less need for incredible cover-ups there.

What else am I missing?

You missed quite a bit. I already said in an earlier post about their agenda. The whole agenda in a nutshell is to take away the right and freedom of the people by making them ask for protection.

 

What they fail to realise is....their protection comes at a great cost. Their freedom, whilst their country walks all over the oil rich countries with full blessing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.