wolfy 12 Posted October 15, 2012 Author Share Posted October 15, 2012 I appraise evidence for a living. But go on, humour me. Media isn't evidence to you. Neither are hundreds of eye witnesses. So, with you being so open minded, what would qualify as evidence for you? It's really simple. Put out clear footage of events with no blurry video coverage and black outs. The technology for cameras and video is crystal clear, so there should be no need for shit footage of events at key stages, yet there always is....why? Because it's faked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted October 15, 2012 Author Share Posted October 15, 2012 But your OWN thought is ridiculous and you've brainwashed YOURSELF into not believing anything you can't see in Hartlepool is fake. Why? It makes you look like a brilliant thinker, obviously. But I thank you, I'm no Quattrocento leader, but you make me feel really smart If I make you feel really smart, then I'm glad to be of help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15561 Posted October 15, 2012 Share Posted October 15, 2012 It's really simple. Put out clear footage of events with no blurry video coverage and black outs. The technology for cameras and video is crystal clear, so there should be no need for shit footage of events at key stages, yet there always is....why? Because it's faked. aka the John Terry defence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock Manson 0 Posted October 15, 2012 Share Posted October 15, 2012 It's really simple. Put out clear footage of events with no blurry video coverage and black outs. The technology for cameras and video is crystal clear, so there should be no need for shit footage of events at key stages, yet there always is....why? Because it's faked. Here you go: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21643 Posted October 15, 2012 Share Posted October 15, 2012 It's really simple. Put out clear footage of events with no blurry video coverage and black outs. The technology for cameras and video is crystal clear, so there should be no need for shit footage of events at key stages, yet there always is....why? Because it's faked. I was under the impression he did film it all. Don't think any video would change your closed mind though. After all, you refuse to believe in the ISS even though you see it with binoculars ffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted October 15, 2012 Author Share Posted October 15, 2012 I was under the impression he did film it all. Don't think any video would change your closed mind though. After all, you refuse to believe in the ISS even though you see it with binoculars ffs. We've been through the fake ISS and you don't see Jack shit that resembles in any form a supposed ISS. I watched all of the red bull footage and sure enough I wondered how they were gonna fake his descent in free fall and then the opening of the parachute. I thought, let's see how they keep the image crisp and clear in excellent Earth light. I wasn't surprised to see the blackout pictures with the yellow images of him supposedly descending, even to opening the chute. Then after the supposed float down for a while, suddenly the picture turns to a blurry image of him, until closer to the ground, it suddenly becomes clear and sharp for his landing. Fake as rocking horse shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21643 Posted October 15, 2012 Share Posted October 15, 2012 We've been through the fake ISS and you don't see Jack shit that resembles in any form a supposed ISS. I watched all of the red bull footage and sure enough I wondered how they were gonna fake his descent in free fall and then the opening of the parachute. I thought, let's see how they keep the image crisp and clear in excellent Earth light. I wasn't surprised to see the blackout pictures with the yellow images of him supposedly descending, even to opening the chute. Then after the supposed float down for a while, suddenly the picture turns to a blurry image of him, until closer to the ground, it suddenly becomes clear and sharp for his landing. Fake as rocking horse shit. it very much sounds like you had preconceived notions of it being faked. You'd make a shit scientist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted October 15, 2012 Share Posted October 15, 2012 How far away was the camera Wolfy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21643 Posted October 15, 2012 Share Posted October 15, 2012 Btw, why didn't they just make better videos if it was faked? They have the technology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted October 15, 2012 Author Share Posted October 15, 2012 it very much sounds like you had preconceived notions of it being faked. You'd make a shit scientist. I agree, I would make a totally shit fake scientist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted October 15, 2012 Author Share Posted October 15, 2012 How far away was the camera Wolfy? Which one, there was allegedly 20 odd of them wasn't there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock Manson 0 Posted October 15, 2012 Share Posted October 15, 2012 Btw, why didn't they just make better videos if it was faked? They have the technology. Because crystal clear videos would mean the jump was obviously faked. Just like grainy footage means the jump was obviously faked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21643 Posted October 15, 2012 Share Posted October 15, 2012 The ground based ones would be several vertical miles away wouldn't they? What did you expect to see? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted October 15, 2012 Share Posted October 15, 2012 Which one, there was allegedly 20 odd of them wasn't there. There were cameras on him, there was a camera on the balloon and then there is a lot of air till we find the next camera which is either on earth or in a flying vehicle. So how far away was the nearest camera? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted October 15, 2012 Author Share Posted October 15, 2012 Btw, why didn't they just make better videos if it was faked? They have the technology. Better videos require much much more attention to detail so the con cannot be uncovered. Remember, they can easily fool the masses and they know a certain proportion know it's crap, so they don't want to take a chance on making things too clear for other people to pick up on anomalies, so they do what all the others do, the black out images and blur the nitty gritty ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted October 15, 2012 Author Share Posted October 15, 2012 The ground based ones would be several vertical miles away wouldn't they? What did you expect to see? Well the ground based one's seem to work perfectly well when the balloon was supposedly at 100,000 feet, even getting brilliant close up pics, so what happened? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted October 15, 2012 Share Posted October 15, 2012 They were filming a man moving at 700mph from 22 miles away and because the picture was a bit grainy, its a fake Big post count on this topic Wolfy. One word, rattled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted October 15, 2012 Author Share Posted October 15, 2012 There were cameras on him, there was a camera on the balloon and then there is a lot of air till we find the next camera which is either on earth or in a flying vehicle. So how far away was the nearest camera? Come on, educate me, how far was the nearest camera? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10876 Posted October 15, 2012 Share Posted October 15, 2012 Love the circular arguments he employs. How do I know it's faked? Well, cos look at how fake the video is! How do I know the videos are faked? Well, cos the thing they're showing is fake, so they must be fake! How do I know the thing they're showing is faked? Well, cos look at how fake the video is! But anyone who disagrees with him is closed minded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted October 15, 2012 Author Share Posted October 15, 2012 They were filming a man moving at 700mph from 22 miles away and because the picture was a bit grainy, its a fake Big post count on this topic Wolfy. One word, rattled. Just a quick typer, far from rattled. The picture wasn't grainy, it was utter shite, obviously it was gonna be as it was all bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted October 15, 2012 Author Share Posted October 15, 2012 Love the circular arguments he employs. How do I know it's faked? Well, cos look at how fake the video is! How do I know the videos are faked? Well, cos the thing they're showing is fake, so they must be fake! How do I know the thing they're showing is faked? Well, cos look at how fake the video is! But anyone who disagrees with him is closed minded You need to stop making things up man, it's bad for you and pisses you off eventually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10876 Posted October 15, 2012 Share Posted October 15, 2012 You need to stop making things up man, it's bad for you and pisses you off eventually. Wolfy, you're closed minded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted October 15, 2012 Share Posted October 15, 2012 Just a quick typer, far from rattled. The picture wasn't grainy, it was utter shite, obviously it was gonna be as it was all bullshit. The footage on youtube seems comprehensive and fairly clear given the circumstances. Because i havent got the time to discuss camera technologies and capturing the light emitted from an object moving at 700mph from 20 odd miles away i wont be proving anything to you. Common sense and basic understanding of the topic should means its not required though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15561 Posted October 15, 2012 Share Posted October 15, 2012 Because crystal clear videos would mean the jump was obviously faked. Just like grainy footage means the jump was obviously faked. Bump, just in case this got forgotten on the last page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted October 15, 2012 Author Share Posted October 15, 2012 Wolfy, you're closed minded. Only where bullshit is concerned. I could say you are closed minded as you stick rigidly to any official story that gets put out. I explained before , I used to believe what was on the telly and in the papers and any amazing thing humans achieved, I swallowed , hook line and sinker. Mainly because I had an attitude of, shrug the shoulders and say, hmmm that takes some doing or whatever. It's amazing what can happen when you actually see things that make you question them. So, I am open minded on a lot of things, yet I'm a very sceptical person, I admit that. The media puts so much spin out about anything and everything, it's actually hard to know what's true and what isn't with most things, not just bullshit stunts like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now