The Fish 10526 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 (edited) I think it proves you don;t know what you're talking about. I'm talking about the small room with a heater in, as in the inside of the satellite not outside. Also, the satellite turning away from the sun to cool down is laughable in the extreme. Space is neither hot nor cold, so what's to cool down? You are correct about the sun though hitting the satellite( if there was one in space, which there isn't) because the sun would basically render the components inside it, toast anyway, just like cooking a Turkey in foil in an oven. Trying to be smart does not make you smart Fish. you literally have no idea, do you? I didn't say the satellite turns from the sun, I said it angles it's radiating areas from the Sun. Space is -270.7degrees Centigrade, as heat is provided by the excitation of particles and there's a naff all particles in the expanse of space You again prove you can't follow your own argument, you state the silver lining of thermos flasks keep the temperature of the liquid in a flask hot (or cold) by reflecting it back, yet you're incapable of understanding that a similar process regulates the temperature of the satellites? Oh I'm not trying to be smart, I'm trying very very hard to dumb down as much as possible. For your benefit. Edited September 15, 2012 by The Fish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 "Space is neither hot nor cold" Really? At Earth's distance from sun, the temperature ranges from 120C to -100C. Space itself is neither hot nor cold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 41458 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 You Thick Bastard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 you literally have no idea, do you? I didn't say the satellite turns from the sun, I said it angles it's radiating areas from the Sun. Space is -270.7degrees Centigrade, as heat is provided by the excitation of particles and there's a naff all particles in the expanse of space You again prove you can't follow your own argument, you state the silver lining of thermos flasks keep the temperature of the liquid in a flask hot (or cold) by reflecting it back, yet you're incapable of understanding that a similar process regulates the temperature of the satellites? Oh I'm not trying to be smart, I'm trying very very hard to dumb down as much as possible. For your benefit. Oh you're dumbing down mighty fine.Space my dear friend is neither hot nor cold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 You Thick Bastard Aye, I wonder who's thick eh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10526 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 Oh you're dumbing down mighty fine. Space my dear friend is neither hot nor cold. Ok, I'll state it again, so that we're clear. Cold is the absence of heat Heat is the measurement of the excitation of particles There are fuck all particles in space Therefore there is an absence of heat Which means it's cold. That, my friend, is irrefutable, especially given you agree on the 2nd and 3rd statements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 Ok, I'll state it again, so that we're clear. Cold is the absence of heat Heat is the measurement of the excitation of particles There are fuck all particles in space Therefore there is an absence of heat Which means it's cold. That, my friend, is irrefutable, especially given you agree on the 2nd and 3rd statements. Space is neither hot nor cold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10526 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 Space is neither hot nor cold. So you're just going to ignore your own statements? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 So you're just going to ignore your own statements? And what would they be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10526 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 And what would they be? see statements 2 & 3 in my post above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 see statements 2 & 3 in my post above. So what are they supposed to mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10526 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 (edited) So what are they supposed to mean? If you're too stupid to remember that you've already described both these statements today, I'm not sure you should have internet privileges 2. hits out atmosphere(particles) and agitates it, giving us the heat we feel. 3. space being basically devoid of the particles we have on Earth Edited September 15, 2012 by The Fish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 If you're too stupid to remember that you've already described both these statements today, I'm not sure you should have internet privileges 2. 3. Yes I know what you said, I'm just wondering how you equate this to space being cold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10526 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 Yes I know what you said, I'm just wondering how you equate this to space being cold. Well, without sufficient particles to be excited, space cannot be anything but cold. Boom LOGICBOMB Boom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 Well, without sufficient particles to be excited, space cannot be anything but cold. Boom LOGICBOMB Boom No logic in that whatsoever.Without sufficient particles in space it is neither hot nor cold...now that's logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10526 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 No logic in that whatsoever. Without sufficient particles in space it is neither hot nor cold...now that's logic. No, wolfy, heat is excited particles, cold is the absence of heat vacuum is the absence of particles, therefore vacuum is cold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 No, wolfy, heat is excited particles, cold is the absence of heat vacuum is the absence of particles, therefore vacuum is cold No Fish. The absence of particles is the absence of heat or cold. Space is a vacuum where up and down, side to side and hot and cold are absent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10526 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 No Fish. The absence of particles is the absence of heat or cold. Space is a vacuum where up and down, side to side and hot and cold are absent. No, you're wrong, you're just flat out wrong. Are you suggesting that the vacuum of space is what, room temperature? no particles = no heat not no particles = 0 temp, no heat. No particles = No energy to provide heat. A total lack of heat. Either you don't understand what a vacuum is, or you're just being willfully ignorant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 No, you're wrong, you're just flat out wrong. Are you suggesting that the vacuum of space is what, room temperature? no particles = no heat not no particles = 0 temp, no heat. No particles = No energy to provide heat. A total lack of heat. Either you don't understand what a vacuum is, or you're just being willfully ignorant. It's you that doesn't understand.You are simply going by Earth values, in that if it's not hot, it's cold "on your own body"... Space in itself being devoid of anything, is neither hot nor cold. You cannot grasp that because you are thinking of your own body and how it gets cold or you are thinking of atmospheric cold. It's ok though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10526 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 It's you that doesn't understand. You are simply going by Earth values, in that if it's not hot, it's cold "on your own body"... Space in itself being devoid of anything, is neither hot nor cold. You cannot grasp that because you are thinking of your own body and how it gets cold or you are thinking of atmospheric cold. It's ok though. No, idiot boy. I'm thinking of heat as energy, which is all it is. Heat is the excitation of particles and, by your own admission, there are barely any particles in space so there cannot be excited particles so there cannot be heat. Now, admit you're wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 No, idiot boy. I'm thinking of heat as energy, which is all it is. Heat is the excitation of particles and, by your own admission, there are barely any particles in space so there cannot be excited particles so there cannot be heat. Now, admit you're wrong. You are correct, there cannot be heat and also there cannot be cold. You are still thinking Earthly. Like I said, I don't expect you to grasp that. I love the idiot boy thing, use it in every post, it makes you appear really superior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@yourservice 67 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 41458 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 Cold is the absence of heat. If there is no heat, it is , by definition, cold. As in so many things Wolfy, you are incorrect when you say there is neither heat nor cold in space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10526 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 You are correct, there cannot be heat and also there cannot be cold. You are still thinking Earthly. Like I said, I don't expect you to grasp that. I love the idiot boy thing, use it in every post, it makes you appear really superior. Why can't there be temperature in space then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted September 15, 2012 Share Posted September 15, 2012 Cold is the absence of heat. If there is no heat, it is , by definition, cold. As in so many things Wolfy, you are incorrect when you say there is neither heat nor cold in space. Nah, I don't think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now