Jump to content

Moon Landings


Christmas Tree
 Share

Recommended Posts

No, there is nothing that upon consideration and study, doesn't add up. Nor is there anything that blatantly is faked.

 

Show a link to the videos that prove that the moon landings are fake, you insist you can see bubbles. Show us that video.

I'd be delighted to. In-fact, I'll even show you one of the lighting used as well.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That video uses the space walks of the US and Russia as proof that the Chinese space walk didn't happen. :scratchhead:

 

You've yet again failed to prove that satellites and space exploration is possible and have been undone by your own evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the Apollo 17 so called ascent from the moon. Now here's a few things to work out (apart from the fact that it looks pathetic haha)

 

The little tea pot takes off from those lander legs and obviously must have a rocket nozzle similar to the one under that lander right?

I mean, if the lander has one, surely the teapot take off rocket much have one even if it's a bit smaller right?

 

Not only that but the ascent teapot is blasting it's rocket fuel directly into the engine of the lander rocket motor, which you would think would blow the thing up and certainly should have made some movement on those lander legs with the thrust, even wobbling it, don't you think?

 

Now when the teapot takes off, amid all the little sparklers that we have all used on bonfire night, can anyone see a nozzle or any sign of rocket exhaust ( even if clear) disturbing the lander legs?

 

Now look how fast it takes off, as if it's been yanked by a cable (chuckles) but look underneath it. Does anyone see a nozzle or even any opening for rocket propellant to exit from?

 

Does that little craft look capable of going 3000mph, leaving moons gravity and then finding and docking with the command module?

Where did they store the fuel needed?

 

This alone is a blatant insult to anybodies intelligence.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That video uses the space walks of the US and Russia as proof that the Chinese space walk didn't happen. :scratchhead:

 

You've yet again failed to prove that satellites and space exploration is possible and have been undone by your own evidence.

I wasn't showing you about the america and Russian space walks, I was showing you this Chinese fake one.

 

There is equal proof of similar with America. Of course, I don't expect you to accept anything , you have your own mind. I'm just glad I'm not easily duped by all this blatant fake rubbish.

Edited by wolfy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question for everyone apart from Wolfy.

 

 

Really why are you still bothering??

I have a question for you.

 

Why are you bothering to come into a thread asking why anyone is bothering?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question for everyone apart from Wolfy.

 

 

Really why are you still bothering??

Boredom mainly.

 

Also when someone holds an opinion that is ridiculous, and unfounded, it bothers me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You tell me my errors.

 

I could pull you up on every sentence you've made if I had sufficient time and the will.

 

But let's start with the most hilarious. You claim the Eath can't be spinning because you can't sense it. :lol: This is simply insane. An average 12 year old knows that if your velocity is constant you are will not feel it. Think about being on a plane or train, do you feel movement at constant speeds? No, you only feel movement if you're accelerating or decelerating.

 

If you know the mass of the Earth and it's spin rate (both variables are well known) then, using these pesky equations you don't understand cos you're too thick therefore they can't be real, you can calculate at what point centrifugal force is exactly in balance with gravity. Turns out this is about 37,000 km. This is called a geostationary orbit used by many satellites you're too thick to believe exist.

 

Using the same equations, you can actually work out at what rate the Eath would need to spin in order for us to be flung off the surface. Turns out this would be about one revolution every 2 hours, far faster than it is now so no panic is needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't showing you about the america and Russian space walks, I was showing you this Chinese fake one.

 

There is equal proof of similar with America. Of course, I don't expect you to accept anything , you have your own mind. I'm just glad I'm not easily duped by all this blatant fake rubbish.

Oh and it's also this arrogance that bothers me. When someone is so obviously not bright enough yet puffs out his chest as if he's unearthed a great secret.

 

I've told you many times that a radio network could not provide the kind of coverage we get from satellites and you choose to ignore it.

 

My job is managing the radio network that the Met Police use and I can state, as fact, your suggestion that the service provided by satellites is, in fact, radio relays is frankly impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could pull you up on every sentence you've made if I had sufficient time and the will.

 

But let's start with the most hilarious. You claim the Eath can't be spinning because you can't sense it. :lol: This is simply insane. An average 12 year old knows that if your velocity is constant you are will not feel it. Think about being on a plane or train, do you feel movement at constant speeds? No, you only feel movement if you're accelerating or decelerating.

 

If you know the mass of the Earth and it's spin rate (both variables are well known) then, using these pesky equations you don't understand cos you're too thick therefore they can't be real, you can calculate at what point centrifugal force is exactly in balance with gravity. Turns out this is about 37,000 km. This is called a geostationary orbit used by many satellites you're too thick to believe exist.

 

Using the same equations, you can actually work out at what rate the Eath would need to spin in order for us to be flung off the surface. Turns out this would be about one revolution every 2 hours, far faster than it is now so no panic is needed.

 

The earth not spinning stuff is clearly cobblers, we wouldn't have a magnetic field/gravity if it wasn't spinning...:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could pull you up on every sentence you've made if I had sufficient time and the will.

 

But let's start with the most hilarious. You claim the Eath can't be spinning because you can't sense it. :lol: This is simply insane. An average 12 year old knows that if your velocity is constant you are will not feel it. Think about being on a plane or train, do you feel movement at constant speeds? No, you only feel movement if you're accelerating or decelerating.

 

If you know the mass of the Earth and it's spin rate (both variables are well known) then, using these pesky equations you don't understand cos you're too thick therefore they can't be real, you can calculate at what point centrifugal force is exactly in balance with gravity. Turns out this is about 37,000 km. This is called a geostationary orbit used by many satellites you're too thick to believe exist.

 

Using the same equations, you can actually work out at what rate the Eath would need to spin in order for us to be flung off the surface. Turns out this would be about one revolution every 2 hours, far faster than it is now so no panic is needed.

Being on a plane is being inside a pressurised tin can flying at about 500mph through the air. All the wind speed created by the plane flies over and under it, with you protected by the aluminium skin.

 

The Earth is a solid and we are told to believe it carries with it, the atmosphere at the same speed, yet within that atmosphere, we have another atmosphere that carries clouds and wind in all directions.

 

It's a classic case of being told to believe in magic and making up calculations to fit bullshit.

 

You can use as many put down comments as you want but you are proving absolutely nothing other than following something you were schooled into and accept it unconditionally.

 

I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh and it's also this arrogance that bothers me. When someone is so obviously not bright enough yet puffs out his chest as if he's unearthed a great secret.

 

I've told you many times that a radio network could not provide the kind of coverage we get from satellites and you choose to ignore it.

 

My job is managing the radio network that the Met Police use and I can state, as fact, your suggestion that the service provided by satellites is, in fact, radio relays is frankly impossible.

A taxi controller manages the radios in those taxi's that run around town, do you think he/she knows how they work?

 

You try and use the fact that you monitor radios and such to back up your argument and it backs up nothing except that you can track someone driving about an area.

 

In the 40's , radar could track incoming aircraft. Was this from satellites?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being on a plane is being inside a pressurised tin can flying at about 500mph through the air. All the wind speed created by the plane flies over and under it, with you protected by the aluminium skin.

 

The Earth is a solid and we are told to believe it carries with it, the atmosphere at the same speed, yet within that atmosphere, we have another atmosphere that carries clouds and wind in all directions.

 

It's a classic case of being told to believe in magic and making up calculations to fit bullshit.

 

You can use as many put down comments as you want but you are proving absolutely nothing other than following something you were schooled into and accept it unconditionally.

 

I don't.

 

TheEarth has weather so can't be rotating? :lol:

 

Fuck me you are monumentally stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A taxi controller manages the radios in those taxi's that run around town, do you think he/she knows how they work?

 

You try and use the fact that you monitor radios and such to back up your argument and it backs up nothing except that you can track someone driving about an area.

 

In the 40's , radar could track incoming aircraft. Was this from satellites?

Again, you misunderstand. My job is to direct engineers to balance the footprints of various radio aerial sites. I'm not a despatcher. I understand how radio waves work.

 

A Radio network could not provide the network you're suggesting. Fact-alack-a-ding-dong.

 

Do you know how RADAR works?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well why ask?

 

Because if you don't have so much as a GCSE in maths you can't comment on physics. It's a bit like having an opinion on Shakespeare without being able to read.

 

Thanks for confirming my suspicions. My advice is to back to school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, you misunderstand. My job is to direct engineers to balance the footprints of various radio aerial sites. I'm not a despatcher. I understand how radio waves work.

 

A Radio network could not provide the network you're suggesting. Fact-alack-a-ding-dong.

 

Do you know how RADAR works?

You do not know where your signal comes from except from maybe a transmitter . You certainly don't know it's from any satellite, only MAYBE that you are told it comes from a satellite.

Yes I know how radar works and anyone who cares to want to know can google it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because if you don't have so much as a GCSE in maths you can't comment on physics. It's a bit like having an opinion on Shakespeare without being able to read.

 

Thanks for confirming my suspicions. My advice is to back to school.

Well as long as you are mapping my life out, at least it will give you some comfort.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.