Christmas Tree 4711 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Ok, so Im not a conspiracy theorist etc etc however I was reading a piece on the moon landings today and found myself wondering whether they were in fact simply an elaborate hype aimed at scaring Russia. Like most, I gobble up the news and claims of the day without any consideration. Just have to wonder if they really had the technology to land a craft on the moon back in the 60's and then take off again and dock with another craft before returning home. Given what we have just recently being able to do with the space shuttle, could they really have transported Moon Buggys back then in such small primitive crafts? As I say, Im not a conspiracy theorist normally but it just hits me as so far fetched this morning. Is there any non american evidence of moon landings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock Manson 0 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15432 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 (edited) Edited July 31, 2012 by Park Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADP 0 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Wolfy's gonna blow this thread up like a motherfucker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 7073 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 I think he'll actually surprise us here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4711 Posted July 31, 2012 Author Share Posted July 31, 2012 Honestly, you need to use your own minds to consider this properly and not just be sheep. We are saying that over 40 years ago we were able to orbit, land, take off, dock. We could transport a huge motor car to the surface yet today we can still only send tea trolleys to Mars. Im becoming very doubtful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30370 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30370 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Space isn't a perfect vacuum though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Most people laugh at Wolfy and dismiss him. CT likes what he sees and shoots for some of the same poppycock action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADP 0 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 (edited) No man or craft of any description have landed on the moon...No mirrors, no buggy's, no 4 legged tin foil/cardboard contraptions...Nothing! Why? Because no craft can work in the vacuum of space, if indeed it is a vacuum as we have been led to believe, which is debatable. But let's go with what we are told and that space is a vacuum. If that's the case, then rockets cannot propel themselves in space because they are propelling against nothing. Any rocket fuel used in space, would be immediately swallowed up by the vacuum, so as soon as it's released, it's gone creating nothing. We don't possess rockets that can break through our atmosphere and like it or not, we are prisoners on this planet...we can't get out and most likely nothing except large meteors can get in. To think they used batteries in 1969 to power pumps, back packs and all the power in that supposed LM, yet the batteries were unaffected by the extreme cold or extreme heat. After all, how hard is it to start your car on a freezing cold morning of only 5 or 10 degrees below freezing, yet these craft not only managed to conquer 240,000 miles of space but also managed to keep the batteries operating (and bear in mind, 1960's batteries) through the extreme cold that was minus 250 or plus 250 depending on the so called day. Stanley Kubrick is the man behind it In my opinion. I think he was drafted in (against his will maybe) to oversee the hoax, which makes sense when you consider he made 2001 a space odyssey. For anyone that has any interest in whether the moon were a hoax or not, I suggest you watch the film "the shining"...most of you might have watched it without giving any thought to it but watch it closely , like a detective if you want. What you will notice , is that Stanley Kubrick is basically telling the audience about the sinister goings on behind the moon landing Apollo11 and there are many many references to it in the film so you have to be vigilant. does that mean stephen king was aware of it too? or are you saying that kubrick is telling the audience through the medium of directorship and not the plot line? give me an example. Edited July 31, 2012 by ADP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4711 Posted July 31, 2012 Author Share Posted July 31, 2012 In the 1960's we could send this 40 years later we can only manage this Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Why would you listen to Stanley Kubrick? He also warned of nuclear armageddon in Dr Strangelove...which is a conspiracy innit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 In the 1960's we could send this 40 years later we can only manage this Really? Are you an atheist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonatine 11329 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Didn't they place a mirror on the moon when they were there, which is used to bounce a laser off to measure the speed which the moon is moving away from the Earth? Or is that a pack of lies too? http://http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jun/21/mcdonald-observatory-space-laser-funding Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 This is the monster doc on it........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 We don't really know what space is, it's all guesswork but let's assume it isn't a perfect vacuum. It's still a vacuum as they tell us, which renders any powered craft useless, even if it could get into space. How are you sure it's a vacuum? It could be a jelly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4721 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 We don't really know what space is, it's all guesswork but let's assume it isn't a perfect vacuum. It's still a vacuum as they tell us, which renders any powered craft useless, even if it could get into space. no it doesn't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4721 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 no it doesn't im not going to sit here and teach you the physics of it, go and look it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30370 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 no it doesn't im not going to sit here and teach you the physics of it, go and look it up. I don't need to look it up, I know it wouldn't work and I don;t want you to teach me anything.If you decide to have input, then feel free but I'm sticking with what I say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 (edited) @ewerk Cause the unmanned missions are legit. Edited July 31, 2012 by Park Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 What junk? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4721 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 hooray for ignorance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4711 Posted July 31, 2012 Author Share Posted July 31, 2012 (edited) Interesting. So are there lots of independent photographic evidence of this junk ? A few links would be nice. Edited July 31, 2012 by Christmas Tree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.403f4a475ac3bb53997c2626c09ef800.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now