Craig 6700 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Vote away.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 43095 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4871 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 (edited) Here we go for the record I'm abstaining since I reckon Willo is more to blame than Krul but neither is Krul blameless, I don't think its equal Edited March 26, 2012 by Semimental Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 43095 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Here we go for the record I'm abstaining since I reckon Willo is more to blame than Krul but neither is Krul blameless, I don't think its equal Lib Dem voter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 22181 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Williamson, by far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4871 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Here we go for the record I'm abstaining since I reckon Willo is more to blame than Krul but neither is Krul blameless, I don't think its equal Lib Dem voter? NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! nip that one in the bud quickly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6700 Posted March 26, 2012 Author Share Posted March 26, 2012 Here we go for the record I'm abstaining since I reckon Willo is more to blame than Krul but neither is Krul blameless, I don't think its equal Lib Dem voter? Splinters all over the place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 7084 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 'Mostly Krul' 'Mostly Williamson' 'About equally' Should cover it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 7084 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Although maybe some people have one of them at 100%. Howay Craig you've fucked this right up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio 0 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 I thought they were both to blame, maybe leaning towards Krul as he looked like he was coming for it which is what I presume Williamson thought too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7181 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Krul didnt shout for it, therefore WIlliamson should have put it into row Z. It's pretty simple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveTheBobby 1 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Krul should've owned that bitches quiff y'all . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 7084 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 And there should be a Pardew option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 33881 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 'Mostly Krul' 'Mostly Williamson' 'Mostly Perch' 'Mostly Pardew' 'Mostly Simpson' 'Mostly Jonas' 'Mostly Guthrie' 'Mostly Ben Arfa' 'About equally' Should cover it. FYP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10972 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Krul didnt shout for it, therefore WIlliamson should have put it into row Z. It's pretty simple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobH 0 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Krul has to tell him what to do. Even if it is put it in row Z then Krul should be telling him. To say nothing is criminal. Then again a decent centre half would have made a decision other than passing it to Long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock Manson 0 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Krul didnt shout for it, therefore WIlliamson should have put it into row Z. It's pretty simple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 7084 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Divisive, correlation with sitters/standers by the look of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveTheBobby 1 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Divisive, correlation with sitters/standers by the look of it. Did you happen to see The Hairy Bikers the other week ? They were in Brussels . They poured jelly into a pastie using a fold-out cardboard funnel women can use to have a standy-up lag . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howay 12496 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 (edited) Both were to blame, Krul didn't shout but Williamson is a 28 year old Professional football player he shouldn't need to be told what to do and if there was any doubt in his mind he should have put the ball in the stands (like a few others have said). Edited March 26, 2012 by Howay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toonotl 3116 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Both at fault for not communicating. Willo at fault for not just clearing the ball. When in doubt put it out etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Williamson, by far He's a gimp, he's not good enough for NUFC and he knows it. He's good in the air, absolutely shite at everything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OTF 7495 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Krul is laregely responsible for Williamson not knowing what was happening, but Williamson was largely responsible for the fact that West Brom scored. So in terms of the question undoubtedly Williamson is at fault for the West Brom goal. However if Krul had properly communicated that he wasn't coming for the ball then Williamson presumably would have easily dealt with it earlier thus preventing him from being in the position to gift them a goal. Two separate stuff ups that conspired to the goal, without the first the second couldn't have happened, but without the second the goal wouldn't have happened. In other words even allowing for Krul's lack of decisive communication Williamson still should have dealt with it. As a defender if you don't know what's happening you send the ball into the stands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 Williamson, by far He's a gimp, he's not good enough for NUFC and he knows it. He's good in the air, absolutely shite at everything else. You're spot on like, he knows he's not good enough to be fair to him-his post match interview he basically almost said as much. When asked if he could believe the season we were having he basically answered something along the lines that he could barely believe he was playing in the Premier League and that spoke volumes for me. We've got some decent players milling about the place now and it must be massively apparent to him he's playing above his level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin S. Assilleekunt 1 Posted March 26, 2012 Share Posted March 26, 2012 (edited) A message for the so-called solicitor: What's that grey man? YOU don't think Mike Williamson is good enough? Perhaps YOU would prefer to watch the likes of Woodgate, or Philippe Albert, but wait, oh yes, that's it, Mike Ashley will never invest enough in the squad to acquire a player of that quality, unlike Freddy Shepherd, who, according to YOU, was a disgraceful little fat man. Well YOU too will soon be a fat grey man with the amount of your own words that YOU will have to eat, should you continue to spout the UTTER GARBAGE that you have been so consistent in producing during your grey little life. Edited March 26, 2012 by Kevin S. Assilleekunt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now