Jump to content

January Transfer window 2012- Deadline Day Madness


Lake Bells tits
 Share

Recommended Posts

anyway, as we went into the transfer window with the money from the sale of Andy Carroll burning a hole in the managers transfer kitty from 12 months ago, so far we have seen 7m out of 35m quid.

 

Wonder if we will make a sale to get this 7m back ?

Edited by LeazesMag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So you've pulled me up on the one thing that's not that relevant to the point I was making, and reiterated your position to confirm the glaring inconsistency in your argument?

 

The policeman can move on. Nothing to see here.

 

wrong Gem mate.

 

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you've pulled me up on the one thing that's not that relevant to the point I was making, and reiterated your position to confirm the glaring inconsistency in your argument?

 

The policeman can move on. Nothing to see here.

 

wrong Gem mate.

 

:lol:

 

you're wrong.

 

Anyway, now your company has changed hands, don't you do any work now ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyway, as we went into the transfer window with the money from the sale of Andy Carroll burning a hole in the managers transfer kitty from 12 months ago, so far we have seen 7m out of 35m quid.

 

Wonder if we will make a sale to get this 7m back ?

£28 mil better off and with better players too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyway, as we went into the transfer window with the money from the sale of Andy Carroll burning a hole in the managers transfer kitty from 12 months ago, so far we have seen 7m out of 35m quid.

 

Wonder if we will make a sale to get this 7m back ?

Mike Ashley is £28 mil better off

 

fixed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree Dr Gloom. Leazes is perfectly entitled to his opinions, tedious or not, same as you and I are.

 

I've been on here and N-O since about 2006 and Leazes/NE5 has been consistent in his views throughout that time and has argued at nauseam with all comers. Unless you're new to TT or N-O, there can't be anything that you don't know about his views or his approach to argument. And yet time after time people will try to "win the argument" or pull him down. Which they basically won't be able to do, and it just perpetuates the whole thing.

 

So to me the choice is simple. If you're sick of his views, then don't engage in debate with him. Or PM the people who constantly troll him and ask them to stop doing it. I doubt there'll be much of a debate over Shepherd if no-one's arguing about it. I don't blame him for responding directly to people trying to call him on things, that's his prerogative imo. The truth is some people enjoy having an argument and Leazes is an obvious target.

 

Banning should be reserved for the truly offensive not somebody you disagree with or find annoying.

 

imo the main thing that needs to be sorted is the quote pyramids - quoting one or two posts is all that is necessary and I'd be in favour of limiting the qupote function for everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree Dr Gloom. Leazes is perfectly entitled to his opinions, tedious or not, same as you and I are.

 

I've been on here and N-O since about 2006 and Leazes/NE5 has been consistent in his views throughout that time and has argued at nauseam with all comers. Unless you're new to TT or N-O, there can't be anything that you don't know about his views or his approach to argument. And yet time after time people will try to "win the argument" or pull him down. Which they basically won't be able to do, and it just perpetuates the whole thing.

 

So to me the choice is simple. If you're sick of his views, then don't engage in debate with him. Or PM the people who constantly troll him and ask them to stop doing it. I doubt there'll be much of a debate over Shepherd if no-one's arguing about it. I don't blame him for responding directly to people trying to call him on things, that's his prerogative imo. The truth is some people enjoy having an argument and Leazes is an obvious target.

 

Banning should be reserved for the truly offensive not somebody you disagree with or find annoying.

 

imo the main thing that needs to be sorted is the quote pyramids - quoting one or two posts is all that is necessary and I'd be in favour of limiting the qupote function for everyone.

 

I agree about the quote pyramids. They're a nightmare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree Dr Gloom. Leazes is perfectly entitled to his opinions, tedious or not, same as you and I are.

 

I've been on here and N-O since about 2006 and Leazes/NE5 has been consistent in his views throughout that time and has argued at nauseam with all comers. Unless you're new to TT or N-O, there can't be anything that you don't know about his views or his approach to argument. And yet time after time people will try to "win the argument" or pull him down. Which they basically won't be able to do, and it just perpetuates the whole thing.

 

So to me the choice is simple. If you're sick of his views, then don't engage in debate with him. Or PM the people who constantly troll him and ask them to stop doing it. I doubt there'll be much of a debate over Shepherd if no-one's arguing about it. I don't blame him for responding directly to people trying to call him on things, that's his prerogative imo. The truth is some people enjoy having an argument and Leazes is an obvious target.

 

Banning should be reserved for the truly offensive not somebody you disagree with or find annoying.

 

imo the main thing that needs to be sorted is the quote pyramids - quoting one or two posts is all that is necessary and I'd be in favour of limiting the qupote function for everyone.

 

I agree about the quote pyramids. They're a nightmare.

 

I'll try and remember to cut the pyramids, sometimes they do encompass the whole picture though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The quote pyramids are part of the reason that Tapatalk is the dogs' plums. It only ever shows the last quote and the response, regardless of how monstrous the pyramid is.

 

It's worth getting on iPad as well as your phone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree Dr Gloom. Leazes is perfectly entitled to his opinions, tedious or not, same as you and I are.

 

I've been on here and N-O since about 2006 and Leazes/NE5 has been consistent in his views throughout that time and has argued at nauseam with all comers. Unless you're new to TT or N-O, there can't be anything that you don't know about his views or his approach to argument. And yet time after time people will try to "win the argument" or pull him down. Which they basically won't be able to do, and it just perpetuates the whole thing.

 

So to me the choice is simple. If you're sick of his views, then don't engage in debate with him. Or PM the people who constantly troll him and ask them to stop doing it. I doubt there'll be much of a debate over Shepherd if no-one's arguing about it. I don't blame him for responding directly to people trying to call him on things, that's his prerogative imo. The truth is some people enjoy having an argument and Leazes is an obvious target.

 

Banning should be reserved for the truly offensive not somebody you disagree with or find annoying.

 

imo the main thing that needs to be sorted is the quote pyramids - quoting one or two posts is all that is necessary and I'd be in favour of limiting the qupote function for everyone.

 

He's not a target man. He goes hunting for it every day and it's boring as fuck. I've got him on ignore and there's still no escape from it. I try my best not to respond but it's impossible when you see him quoted in every fucking thread. I agree he's done nowt deserving of a ban so far but there's always hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree Dr Gloom. Leazes is perfectly entitled to his opinions, tedious or not, same as you and I are.

 

I've been on here and N-O since about 2006 and Leazes/NE5 has been consistent in his views throughout that time and has argued at nauseam with all comers. Unless you're new to TT or N-O, there can't be anything that you don't know about his views or his approach to argument. And yet time after time people will try to "win the argument" or pull him down. Which they basically won't be able to do, and it just perpetuates the whole thing.

 

So to me the choice is simple. If you're sick of his views, then don't engage in debate with him. Or PM the people who constantly troll him and ask them to stop doing it. I doubt there'll be much of a debate over Shepherd if no-one's arguing about it. I don't blame him for responding directly to people trying to call him on things, that's his prerogative imo. The truth is some people enjoy having an argument and Leazes is an obvious target.

 

Banning should be reserved for the truly offensive not somebody you disagree with or find annoying.

 

imo the main thing that needs to be sorted is the quote pyramids - quoting one or two posts is all that is necessary and I'd be in favour of limiting the qupote function for everyone.

 

I agree about the quote pyramids. They're a nightmare.

 

I'll try and remember to cut the pyramids, sometimes they do encompass the whole picture though.

 

I expect most people read posts sequentially, so you don't need to see them repeated again and again to get a sense of the points being made. It actually detracts from the power of the argument if you have to wade down a pyramid of quotes to find the latest point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Titman! Where've you been?

 

Whey hey!

 

Had a month off work to enjoy the summer, Gem. So been surfing, golfing, bit of trekking in the bush, lounging on beaches ogling women in a way inappropriate for my age, and so on. Did some touristy stuff too so went to South Island, visited a few vineyards in Blenheim, did some whale/dolphin watching in Kaikoura, and then went to Queenstown and did some sightseeing, jetboating etc.

 

I've checked in here occasionally but been too busy to post. We had family over too over xmas so a lot of eating and drinking. Oh and CT - I haven't put a single pound on over xmas :jonas:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The quote pyramids are part of the reason that Tapatalk is the dogs' plums. It only ever shows the last quote and the response, regardless of how monstrous the pyramid is. It's worth getting on iPad as well as your phone.

 

Cool. I've got an ipad. Is tapatalk a free app?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree Dr Gloom. Leazes is perfectly entitled to his opinions, tedious or not, same as you and I are.

 

I've been on here and N-O since about 2006 and Leazes/NE5 has been consistent in his views throughout that time and has argued at nauseam with all comers. Unless you're new to TT or N-O, there can't be anything that you don't know about his views or his approach to argument. And yet time after time people will try to "win the argument" or pull him down. Which they basically won't be able to do, and it just perpetuates the whole thing.

 

So to me the choice is simple. If you're sick of his views, then don't engage in debate with him. Or PM the people who constantly troll him and ask them to stop doing it. I doubt there'll be much of a debate over Shepherd if no-one's arguing about it. I don't blame him for responding directly to people trying to call him on things, that's his prerogative imo. The truth is some people enjoy having an argument and Leazes is an obvious target.

 

Banning should be reserved for the truly offensive not somebody you disagree with or find annoying.

 

imo the main thing that needs to be sorted is the quote pyramids - quoting one or two posts is all that is necessary and I'd be in favour of limiting the qupote function for everyone.

 

I agree about the quote pyramids. They're a nightmare.

 

I'll try and remember to cut the pyramids, sometimes they do encompass the whole picture though.

 

I expect most people read posts sequentially, so you don't need to see them repeated again and again to get a sense of the points being made. It actually detracts from the power of the argument if you have to wade down a pyramid of quotes to find the latest point.

 

What you can do to reduce their length is chop out sections of the quote which are not relevant to your particular point. As I have not done here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The quote pyramids are part of the reason that Tapatalk is the dogs' plums. It only ever shows the last quote and the response, regardless of how monstrous the pyramid is. It's worth getting on iPad as well as your phone.

 

Cool. I've got an ipad. Is tapatalk a free app?

 

£2.99, I'm afraid. But it's money well spent if you spend any time on forums.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boring

 

factual though.

Really? Show everyone the evidence that Mike Ashley has POCKETED the money

 

of course he has, Mike Ashley IS newcastle united football club, he owns the lot, so any profits are his, any loss are his, its the main difference between the previous board and this one, shepard was able to gamble, lose, put the club into huge amounts of debt and sit happy, while slimmed down Mike, any loss, he feels it, any profit keeps him in champagne and cheap hookers

Edited by sandman02uk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Titman! Where've you been?

 

Whey hey!

 

Had a month off work to enjoy the summer, Gem. So been surfing, golfing, bit of trekking in the bush, lounging on beaches ogling women in a way inappropriate for my age, and so on. Did some touristy stuff too so went to South Island, visited a few vineyards in Blenheim, did some whale/dolphin watching in Kaikoura, and then went to Queenstown and did some sightseeing, jetboating etc.

 

I've checked in here occasionally but been too busy to post. We had family over too over xmas so a lot of eating and drinking. Oh and CT - I haven't put a single pound on over xmas

 

You absolute twat, that all sounds class! Life in NZ sounds good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.