LeazesMag 0 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 It's a shame that LM has put himself in a position where he can't even be happy about us signing a new number 9. He's like a kid that's getting tickled, but they're in a huff about something so they're steadfastly refusing to giggle. nowt to do with signing a new number 9, my position is clear, for anyone with half a brain. Its because we are selling our best players and not backing the manager, in his wishes and with the money, in the way a big progressive club ought to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4669 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 But Cisses was Pardews wish and they backed him! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44112 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 It's a shame that LM has put himself in a position where he can't even be happy about us signing a new number 9. He's like a kid that's getting tickled, but they're in a huff about something so they're steadfastly refusing to giggle. nowt to do with signing a new number 9, my position is clear, for anyone with half a brain. Its because we are selling our best players and not backing the manager, in his wishes and with the money, in the way a big progressive club ought to do. The players sold are all being more than adequately replaced, and the manager just signed a player he says he's been tracking for 2 years. These are just sound bites that you're coming out with. They aren't true. Your stance on the £35m is a bit ridiculous - if we can improve the squad for less than that figure, that is a good thing. Other clubs are actually envious of our ability to keep picking up these bargains, and yet you can't see it because the numbers don't add up to 35. It's such a stupid argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10674 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Leazes, to take your logic to it's conclusion, if we sold our entire squad for a sum total of £500m and bought the very best players in every position for a sum total of anything less than £500m you wouldn't be happy. It's an irrational position and a massive hole in your argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 But Cisses was Pardews wish and they backed him! Fair enough, lets see if the other 27m quid turns up and nobody is sold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Leazes, to take your logic to it's conclusion, if we sold our entire squad for a sum total of £500m and bought the very best players in every position for a sum total of anything less than £500m you wouldn't be happy. It's an irrational position and a massive hole in your argument. haha. Rubbish. Stop insinuating falsehoods, I thought you were the board policeman and are picking people up for this sort of thing ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 It's a shame that LM has put himself in a position where he can't even be happy about us signing a new number 9. He's like a kid that's getting tickled, but they're in a huff about something so they're steadfastly refusing to giggle. nowt to do with signing a new number 9, my position is clear, for anyone with half a brain. Its because we are selling our best players and not backing the manager, in his wishes and with the money, in the way a big progressive club ought to do. The players sold are all being more than adequately replaced, and the manager just signed a player he says he's been tracking for 2 years. These are just sound bites that you're coming out with. They aren't true. Your stance on the £35m is a bit ridiculous - if we can improve the squad for less than that figure, that is a good thing. Other clubs are actually envious of our ability to keep picking up these bargains, and yet you can't see it because the numbers don't add up to 35. It's such a stupid argument. I made a post or two on Newcastle Online 3 or 4 years ago saying I thought Pardew was a good manager with a good future [look for it and bump it if you don't believe me] so I would def back his judgements, that isn't to say every judgement he makes is correct though, because nobody in the world has ever got every decision like this right, not even Brian Clough and Peter Taylor. Expecting the entire fee to be recycled back to the manager is not a stupid argument at all, it is what big clubs do, and it is what you as a supporter of a supposed big club, should be expecting and demanding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10674 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Leazes, to take your logic to it's conclusion, if we sold our entire squad for a sum total of £500m and bought the very best players in every position for a sum total of anything less than £500m you wouldn't be happy. It's an irrational position and a massive hole in your argument. haha. Rubbish. Stop insinuating falsehoods, I thought you were the board policeman and are picking people up for this sort of thing ? I'm not insinuating falsehoods. You've said that until the "other £27m is invested" you won't be happy, which means that any money recouped through transfer deals, you want spent on transfer deals. So despite improving the squad, you're not happy. Despite having a strike force which have a goal scoring record, you're not happy. Despite a central midfield which is the envy of the majority of the league, you're not happy. Despite being 6th and buying the targets identified by Pardew, you're not happy. see a pattern? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Leazes, to take your logic to it's conclusion, if we sold our entire squad for a sum total of £500m and bought the very best players in every position for a sum total of anything less than £500m you wouldn't be happy. It's an irrational position and a massive hole in your argument. haha. Rubbish. Stop insinuating falsehoods, I thought you were the board policeman and are picking people up for this sort of thing ? I'm not insinuating falsehoods. You've said that until the "other £27m is invested" you won't be happy, which means that any money recouped through transfer deals, you want spent on transfer deals. So despite improving the squad, you're not happy. Despite having a strike force which have a goal scoring record, you're not happy. Despite a central midfield which is the envy of the majority of the league, you're not happy. Despite being 6th and buying the targets identified by Pardew, you're not happy. see a pattern? no, you said " if we sold our entire squad for a sum total of £500m and bought the very best players in every position for a sum total of anything less than £500m you wouldn't be happy." That is a false insinuation, and its also crap. You said - also - you would in your role of board policeman, clamp down on such false insinuations, but are now doing it yourself ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44112 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 I don't know what he's more annoyed about - the signing of a new number 9, or Inspector Fish of the Yard's sub standard policing performance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donaldstott 0 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 It's a shame that LM has put himself in a position where he can't even be happy about us signing a new number 9. He's like a kid that's getting tickled, but they're in a huff about something so they're steadfastly refusing to giggle. nowt to do with signing a new number 9, my position is clear, for anyone with half a brain. Its because we are selling our best players and not backing the manager, in his wishes and with the money, in the way a big progressive club ought to do. The players sold are all being more than adequately replaced, and the manager just signed a player he says he's been tracking for 2 years. These are just sound bites that you're coming out with. They aren't true. Your stance on the £35m is a bit ridiculous - if we can improve the squad for less than that figure, that is a good thing. Other clubs are actually envious of our ability to keep picking up these bargains, and yet you can't see it because the numbers don't add up to 35. It's such a stupid argument. I made a post or two on Newcastle Online 3 or 4 years ago saying I thought Pardew was a good manager with a good future [look for it and bump it if you don't believe me] so I would def back his judgements, that isn't to say every judgement he makes is correct though, because nobody in the world has ever got every decision like this right, not even Brian Clough and Peter Taylor. Expecting the entire fee to be recycled back to the manager is not a stupid argument at all, it is what big clubs do, and it is what you as a supporter of a supposed big club, should be expecting and demanding. It's not though is it. Arsenal haven't spent the money they got for Fabregas and Nasri, going further back they didn't replace Petit and Overmars with players costing anything like that money. Did they spend £25m on a replacement for Henry? Did they spend identical money to replace Ashley Cole or Kolo Toure? Man U (which you still haven't addresses properly) didn't replace Ronaldo and Tevez with players that cost anything like £100m. These are big clubs run like businesses. Buying expensive and selling cheap is what we've done in the past and in any business anywhere in the world that means one thing - going bust. What is stopping you accepting that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 I don't know what he's more annoyed about - the signing of a new number 9, or Inspector Fish of the Yard's sub standard policing performance. Fish has got him eating his shit and begging for another plateful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 (edited) I don't know what he's more annoyed about - the signing of a new number 9, or Inspector Fish of the Yard's sub standard policing performance. Fish has got him eating his shit and begging for another plateful. so remind me again, didn't you disagree with me when i told you the club was going to be run like a selling club, as a sideline for Sports Direct, and would get nowhere near the Champions League, settling for survival, pocketing the cash from sales etc etc ? As usual, you say absolutely nothing. You're even blocking me because you know that I've made a complete arse of you. Even deaders has more idea than you have. Edited January 18, 2012 by LeazesMag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 I don't know what he's more annoyed about - the signing of a new number 9, or Inspector Fish of the Yard's sub standard policing performance. officially joined the ranks of the clueless, who won't be told anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10674 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Leazes, to take your logic to it's conclusion, if we sold our entire squad for a sum total of £500m and bought the very best players in every position for a sum total of anything less than £500m you wouldn't be happy. It's an irrational position and a massive hole in your argument. haha. Rubbish. Stop insinuating falsehoods, I thought you were the board policeman and are picking people up for this sort of thing ? I'm not insinuating falsehoods. You've said that until the "other £27m is invested" you won't be happy, which means that any money recouped through transfer deals, you want spent on transfer deals. So despite improving the squad, you're not happy. Despite having a strike force which have a goal scoring record, you're not happy. Despite a central midfield which is the envy of the majority of the league, you're not happy. Despite being 6th and buying the targets identified by Pardew, you're not happy. see a pattern? no, you said " if we sold our entire squad for a sum total of £500m and bought the very best players in every position for a sum total of anything less than £500m you wouldn't be happy." That is a false insinuation, and its also crap. You said - also - you would in your role of board policeman, clamp down on such false insinuations, but are now doing it yourself ? Fine, I clarify because you're being pedantic. I was not making a false insinuation I was using a debating method to reduce your argument to it's furthest point, reductio ad ridiculum. To reduce to ridiculous. We sold Carroll for £35m and signed Cisse for £7.5m and you're not happy, Carroll has scored fuck all, Cisse has scored loads. It's very difficult to have a reasonable debate with you, you know. Not because you disagree with me, but because you don't structure your arguments properly, nor listen to the arguments of others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Leazes, to take your logic to it's conclusion, if we sold our entire squad for a sum total of £500m and bought the very best players in every position for a sum total of anything less than £500m you wouldn't be happy. It's an irrational position and a massive hole in your argument. haha. Rubbish. Stop insinuating falsehoods, I thought you were the board policeman and are picking people up for this sort of thing ? I'm not insinuating falsehoods. You've said that until the "other £27m is invested" you won't be happy, which means that any money recouped through transfer deals, you want spent on transfer deals. So despite improving the squad, you're not happy. Despite having a strike force which have a goal scoring record, you're not happy. Despite a central midfield which is the envy of the majority of the league, you're not happy. Despite being 6th and buying the targets identified by Pardew, you're not happy. see a pattern? no, you said " if we sold our entire squad for a sum total of £500m and bought the very best players in every position for a sum total of anything less than £500m you wouldn't be happy." That is a false insinuation, and its also crap. You said - also - you would in your role of board policeman, clamp down on such false insinuations, but are now doing it yourself ? I think it was hyperbole like, Leazes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Leazes, to take your logic to it's conclusion, if we sold our entire squad for a sum total of £500m and bought the very best players in every position for a sum total of anything less than £500m you wouldn't be happy. It's an irrational position and a massive hole in your argument. haha. Rubbish. Stop insinuating falsehoods, I thought you were the board policeman and are picking people up for this sort of thing ? I'm not insinuating falsehoods. You've said that until the "other £27m is invested" you won't be happy, which means that any money recouped through transfer deals, you want spent on transfer deals. So despite improving the squad, you're not happy. Despite having a strike force which have a goal scoring record, you're not happy. Despite a central midfield which is the envy of the majority of the league, you're not happy. Despite being 6th and buying the targets identified by Pardew, you're not happy. see a pattern? no, you said " if we sold our entire squad for a sum total of £500m and bought the very best players in every position for a sum total of anything less than £500m you wouldn't be happy." That is a false insinuation, and its also crap. You said - also - you would in your role of board policeman, clamp down on such false insinuations, but are now doing it yourself ? Fine, I clarify because you're being pedantic. I was not making a false insinuation I was using a debating method to reduce your argument to it's furthest point, reductio ad ridiculum. To reduce to ridiculous. aye of course, thats different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44112 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 I don't know what he's more annoyed about - the signing of a new number 9, or Inspector Fish of the Yard's sub standard policing performance. officially joined the ranks of the clueless, who won't be told anything. Excellent, is it just the two of us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10674 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Leazes, to take your logic to it's conclusion, if we sold our entire squad for a sum total of £500m and bought the very best players in every position for a sum total of anything less than £500m you wouldn't be happy. It's an irrational position and a massive hole in your argument. haha. Rubbish. Stop insinuating falsehoods, I thought you were the board policeman and are picking people up for this sort of thing ? I'm not insinuating falsehoods. You've said that until the "other £27m is invested" you won't be happy, which means that any money recouped through transfer deals, you want spent on transfer deals. So despite improving the squad, you're not happy. Despite having a strike force which have a goal scoring record, you're not happy. Despite a central midfield which is the envy of the majority of the league, you're not happy. Despite being 6th and buying the targets identified by Pardew, you're not happy. see a pattern? no, you said " if we sold our entire squad for a sum total of £500m and bought the very best players in every position for a sum total of anything less than £500m you wouldn't be happy." That is a false insinuation, and its also crap. You said - also - you would in your role of board policeman, clamp down on such false insinuations, but are now doing it yourself ? Fine, I clarify because you're being pedantic. I was not making a false insinuation I was using a debating method to reduce your argument to it's furthest point, reductio ad ridiculum. To reduce to ridiculous. aye of course, thats different. Of course it is; a false insinuation is that you're mentally ill. Reductio ad ridiculum is to say that because Gemmil mocks you, he advocates everybody bullying every older person. If you can't see the difference perhaps the former statement isn't such a falsehood after all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney 0 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4669 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 By the way, what fantastic PR once again for Newcastle United to hijack the ANC and show case such a big signing. It will be all the talk today and can only do us very well in the future. While we may not have the resources of the bankrolled clubs, we appear to be once again have that big club, big player feel back which can only help ease more deals over the lines. To think only last week we were panicking about losing Ba, not knowing the real intention was to get a class No 9 to partner him. The only downside to all of this is having to wait four weeks to see this team take to the field. Cant wait for the mackems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 Leazes, to take your logic to it's conclusion, if we sold our entire squad for a sum total of £500m and bought the very best players in every position for a sum total of anything less than £500m you wouldn't be happy. It's an irrational position and a massive hole in your argument. haha. Rubbish. Stop insinuating falsehoods, I thought you were the board policeman and are picking people up for this sort of thing ? I'm not insinuating falsehoods. You've said that until the "other £27m is invested" you won't be happy, which means that any money recouped through transfer deals, you want spent on transfer deals. So despite improving the squad, you're not happy. Despite having a strike force which have a goal scoring record, you're not happy. Despite a central midfield which is the envy of the majority of the league, you're not happy. Despite being 6th and buying the targets identified by Pardew, you're not happy. see a pattern? no, you said " if we sold our entire squad for a sum total of £500m and bought the very best players in every position for a sum total of anything less than £500m you wouldn't be happy." That is a false insinuation, and its also crap. You said - also - you would in your role of board policeman, clamp down on such false insinuations, but are now doing it yourself ? Fine, I clarify because you're being pedantic. I was not making a false insinuation I was using a debating method to reduce your argument to it's furthest point, reductio ad ridiculum. To reduce to ridiculous. aye of course, thats different. Of course it is; a false insinuation is that you're mentally ill. Reductio ad ridiculum is to say that because Gemmil mocks you, he advocates everybody bullying every older person. If you can't see the difference perhaps the former statement isn't such a falsehood after all and when I am proved to be correct ? Again ? What then ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 CT is high as a fucking kite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 18, 2012 Share Posted January 18, 2012 By the way, what fantastic PR once again for Newcastle United to hijack the ANC and show case such a big signing. It will be all the talk today and can only do us very well in the future. While we may not have the resources of the bankrolled clubs, we appear to be once again have that big club, big player feel back which can only help ease more deals over the lines. To think only last week we were panicking about losing Ba, not knowing the real intention was to get a class No 9 to partner him. The only downside to all of this is having to wait four weeks to see this team take to the field. Cant wait for the mackems. minus Krul, if current rumours are to be believed ? Then what ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now