Jump to content

Blur v Oasis


Dr Gloom
 Share

Recommended Posts

Which camp were you in? Got to say I always preferred Blur. Loved the first two Oasis albums but all got too samey after that, no real progression. Albarn on the other hand will be looked back on as one of the best songwriters of his generation. I love how every album had a different sound to the last but he consistently penned good tunes. His latest stuff couldnt be more different to Leisure. That said, I do quite like Noel Gallaghers new solo material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Blur had great singles but I always found the albums to be sub par compared to Oasis'

 

As a teenager I actually preferred Blur (1st gig I ever went to) but it was much more about singles back then... If I was going to sit and listen to an album I'd always put Definately Maybe or Whats the Story Morning Glory on over a Blur album any day of the week.

 

When you then look at the singles Oasis had on top of a couple of really outstanding albums then Blur weren't as good despite still being an excellent band IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oasis are the best band that's ever been in my eyes, particularly there stuff pre 1996. Comparing them to Blur for me is like comparing Man Utd to MK Dons. Damon Alburn was a stuck up middle class prick too pretending to be something he wasn't. Some Oasis songs are to this day my favourite songs, but for some reason it's quite popular these days not to give their music the praise that they deserve. Songs like Supersonic are better songs than almost any band could dream of creating, and some of their songs which weren't even properly released and used as b songs like "It's good to be free" would be the best song the vast majority of bands ever created. They made great songs after 1996, but they weren't as consistently good as they were prior to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought they were both shit at the time.

 

Blur and 13 turned me round on them......All Around The World on Oasis.

All Round The World wasn't even in Oasis best 50 songs, in fact I'd say it was the second worst song on the third album without a doubt.

Edited by McFaul
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What struck me while listening to a song that sampled Radiohead last night is that someone who's 14 now (same age i was for Blur vs Oasis vs Radiohead etc) was born the year that OK Computer came out.

 

That's the same gap as there was between my birth and Rubber Soul...which I thought was the holy grail at that age.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tbf, I don't think it's anything to do with it being popular not to give their music the praise it deserves. I was a big Oasis fan back in the day, but every release after their first two albums was a disappointment, and was deserving of very little praise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought they were both shit at the time.

 

Blur and 13 turned me round on them......All Around The World on Oasis.

All Round The World wasn't even in Oasis best 50 songs, in fact I'd say it was the second worst song on the third album without a doubt.

 

Noel would disagree, it's one of his favourites too. It was written before the first album, but they never had the funds to do it justice productionwise until that third album, and it's by far the best thing on there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the peak of the "war", i.e. 1995, I was definitely in the Oasis camp - they were the better singles band and "The Great Escape" was a bloody awful album (though in hindsight I'll give a pass to "The Universal"). Blur and their individual members went on to do far more interesting things though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought they were both shit at the time.

 

Blur and 13 turned me round on them......All Around The World on Oasis.

All Round The World wasn't even in Oasis best 50 songs, in fact I'd say it was the second worst song on the third album without a doubt.

 

Noel would disagree, it's one of his favourites too. It was written before the first album, but they never had the funds to do it justice productionwise until that third album, and it's by far the best thing on there.

Never had the funds to include a song till their third album, what a load of shit. They had funds to include pish like Be Here Now, which the third album was named after. Strange you like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seem to remember one of my first arguments on here was due to my hatred of Oasis generally. I've mellowed since then like. If I had a Gun is a lovely song.

You're good at using calculators and pie charts, but I don't think your musical taste is up to much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think Oasis are canny average looking back. Couple of the early tracks are good but for the most part, the hooks that everyone loves are poor knock-offs of better bands. Don't Look Back in Anger is a well put together song though and I like the guitar sound Noel gets on the second track on The Masterplan. A lot of those early albums are a load of overblown rubbish with half-decent choruses and samey guitar solos and they didn't get any good until the drugs wore off and they had a couple of Kinks rip offs as singles in the 2000s like Importance of Being Idle.

 

The less said about Beady Eye and Noel's new project, the better. Dull as dishwater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought they were both shit at the time.

 

Blur and 13 turned me round on them......All Around The World on Oasis.

All Round The World wasn't even in Oasis best 50 songs, in fact I'd say it was the second worst song on the third album without a doubt.

 

Noel would disagree, it's one of his favourites too. It was written before the first album, but they never had the funds to do it justice productionwise until that third album, and it's by far the best thing on there.

Never had the funds to include a song till their third album, what a load of shit. They had funds to include pish like Be Here Now, which the third album was named after. Strange you like.

 

A 38 piece orchestra is quite an expense for a fledgling band on their debut album. They didn't want the grandiosty lost to the standard guitar/drums/bass that makes up the first couple of albums.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think your musical taste is up to much.

 

Can't remember if it's you or CT that bigs up Phil Collins, but the fact there's some confusion there says it all about your taste. Quite pleased to be at the other end of the spectrum from you and CT. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.