Toonpack 9121 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 One thread which Leazes comments won't de rail are you really 38 ? When did you start supporting Newcastle ? Yep, I also posted when and why in a previous thread although that has absolutely nothing to do with you de railing threads with your constant ramblings you have the knowledge and outlook of an 8 year old. You only think its "derailing" because you don't agree. What i say will stand the test of time. Just me?? You really are mental anyone who seriously thinks Mike Ashley will ever match the Halls and Shepherd is mental chum. Anyone who can't see the game has fundamentaly changed and the "Halls (Dougie) and Shepherd" could never have matched the "Hall (SJH)" years is similarly mental. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30169 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 freddie (et al) had higher highs and lower lows. like relegation ? And still waiting for a european qualification via league position ? Well done. sacking SBR was much much lower than relegation. I'd like to think that's a decent bit of wummery. Then again, maybe not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 I think you're in danger of giving Phyllis too much credit there tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 One thread which Leazes comments won't de rail are you really 38 ? When did you start supporting Newcastle ? Yep, I also posted when and why in a previous thread although that has absolutely nothing to do with you de railing threads with your constant ramblings you have the knowledge and outlook of an 8 year old. You only think its "derailing" because you don't agree. What i say will stand the test of time. Just me?? You really are mental anyone who seriously thinks Mike Ashley will ever match the Halls and Shepherd is mental chum. Never said he would chum but i, unlike you, accept the playing fields are not as level as they used to be and in current circumstances we will not be challenging the top 4. Accept it and move on, enjoy the football and remember all the good times you had with Fred I'll be polite about this and say the situation has been explained dozens of times. A different era, but the opposition is the same, Newcastle United are the same club, the last regime met their competitors and achieved a lot for the club, the new regime is not rising to meet their competitors in the same way. Quite how people like you think that 7th for the last regime is failure [considering where they started] and 7th for Ashley is the pinnacle, is quite beyond any sort of logic. I won't expand further. Trophyshy has a point, I'll try and point these things out in a more constructive fashion. Although calling a spade a spade is something I've always done and don't see the harm in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 freddie (et al) had higher highs and lower lows. like relegation ? And still waiting for a european qualification via league position ? Well done. sacking SBR was much much lower than relegation. I'd like to think that's a decent bit of wummery. Then again, maybe not. I'm sure you will attempt to make some sort of sense from it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30169 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 I'm agreeing with you, you fucking lunatic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 (edited) One thread which Leazes comments won't de rail are you really 38 ? When did you start supporting Newcastle ? Yep, I also posted when and why in a previous thread although that has absolutely nothing to do with you de railing threads with your constant ramblings you have the knowledge and outlook of an 8 year old. You only think its "derailing" because you don't agree. What i say will stand the test of time. Just me?? You really are mental anyone who seriously thinks Mike Ashley will ever match the Halls and Shepherd is mental chum. Anyone who can't see the game has fundamentaly changed and the "Halls (Dougie) and Shepherd" could never have matched the "Hall (SJH)" years is similarly mental. I don't recall anybody saying that 5 years or so ago as the reason for wanting them replaced. Did you know Man City were going to be taken over by a bunch of Arabs ? You should have went to the bookies. I also don't see Man City being taken over by a bunch of Arabs as a reason for NUFC to become a selling club again like they were in the 70's and 80's, competing with the lower level premiership clubs, but I'm sure you will continue to kid yourself differently., and justify your hatred of Fred, like all the other numpties on other message boards and here who also are spouting the same line. Anybody but Fred would do better than this, is what you all said. So when exactly is this somebody going to do better, all he has done so far is sell our best players, get relegated and drop the average league position massively as well as seeing levels of interest in the club also go down in terms of sponsorship and other revenues including match tickets. You also said for a long time that you would review your views of Mike Ashley after the 1st September and the summer transfer deadline. What is your new appraisal ? We know you thought he would spend the Carroll cash, as you said in your own words "he is now in a position to spend for the first time", putting you in a position where you could have then said "who's showing ambition now then ?" [obvious as fuck tbh], but as it didn't happen [as some of us told you] what is your appraisal now ? This is a genuine question. You said this for a long time. What is your new appraisal, and justify whatever you are going to say. Stop moving the goalposts, and contribute a reply to a genuine constructive question. Edited December 9, 2011 by LeazesMag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 (edited) I'm agreeing with you, you fucking lunatic. careful with the abuse chum. You must be drinking at work again, the meaning of my post is obvious. Edited December 9, 2011 by LeazesMag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock Manson 0 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 One thread which Leazes comments won't de rail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaythesouthernmag 0 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 One thread which Leazes comments won't de rail are you really 38 ? When did you start supporting Newcastle ? Yep, I also posted when and why in a previous thread although that has absolutely nothing to do with you de railing threads with your constant ramblings you have the knowledge and outlook of an 8 year old. You only think its "derailing" because you don't agree. What i say will stand the test of time. Just me?? You really are mental anyone who seriously thinks Mike Ashley will ever match the Halls and Shepherd is mental chum. Never said he would chum but i, unlike you, accept the playing fields are not as level as they used to be and in current circumstances we will not be challenging the top 4. Accept it and move on, enjoy the football and remember all the good times you had with Fred I'll be polite about this and say the situation has been explained dozens of times. A different era, but the opposition is the same, Newcastle United are the same club, the last regime met their competitors and achieved a lot for the club, the new regime is not rising to meet their competitors in the same way. Quite how people like you think that 7th for the last regime is failure [considering where they started] and 7th for Ashley is the pinnacle, is quite beyond any sort of logic. I won't expand further. Trophyshy has a point, I'll try and point these things out in a more constructive fashion. Although calling a spade a spade is something I've always done and don't see the harm in it. I seriously can't believe you don't think the opposition has changed and the finances of the likes of City,Chelsea,Man U and to a certain extent the dippers has influenced how football works and until you do its pretty pointless either myself or anyone else trying to debate it with you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 (edited) Atyourservice, Favour please... could you find a picture of 2 really fat, hideous blokes in an unbelievably mancy scatalogical porn and photoshop the heads of Ashley and Shepherd onto them. Hoy it in here and then we can all use it in response to any thread started by forum jokers beginning this discussion again. ta Edited December 9, 2011 by Happy Face Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 One thread which Leazes comments won't de rail are you really 38 ? When did you start supporting Newcastle ? Yep, I also posted when and why in a previous thread although that has absolutely nothing to do with you de railing threads with your constant ramblings you have the knowledge and outlook of an 8 year old. You only think its "derailing" because you don't agree. What i say will stand the test of time. Just me?? You really are mental anyone who seriously thinks Mike Ashley will ever match the Halls and Shepherd is mental chum. Never said he would chum but i, unlike you, accept the playing fields are not as level as they used to be and in current circumstances we will not be challenging the top 4. Accept it and move on, enjoy the football and remember all the good times you had with Fred I'll be polite about this and say the situation has been explained dozens of times. A different era, but the opposition is the same, Newcastle United are the same club, the last regime met their competitors and achieved a lot for the club, the new regime is not rising to meet their competitors in the same way. Quite how people like you think that 7th for the last regime is failure [considering where they started] and 7th for Ashley is the pinnacle, is quite beyond any sort of logic. I won't expand further. Trophyshy has a point, I'll try and point these things out in a more constructive fashion. Although calling a spade a spade is something I've always done and don't see the harm in it. I seriously can't believe you don't think the opposition has changed and the finances of the likes of City,Chelsea,Man U and to a certain extent the dippers has influenced how football works and until you do its pretty pointless either myself or anyone else trying to debate it with you I told you a few weeks ago that you will never, ever, anywhere find any post from me saying I expect Mike Ashley to fund the club in the manner that Man City and Chelsea are. Fuck me sideways, why don't you read properly and understand properly. Newcastle United selling their best players and the owner pocketing the cash or directing it elsewhere, and not backing his manager, and competing at the levels of the lower premiership also-rans, is a different matter entirely. I have said to trophyshy that I will try and ignore posts like this, but you really are the limit. How many more times does this need to be explained ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil 6 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 freddie (et al) had higher highs and lower lows. like relegation ? And still waiting for a european qualification via league position ? Well done. sacking SBR was much much lower than relegation. where did we finish in the 2nd division/championship, after "Shepherd" sacked SBR, as he was running the club all on his own with less than 30% of the shares ? Have we all blinked and missed something I think you have. "et al" is latin for and others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack 9121 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 One thread which Leazes comments won't de rail are you really 38 ? When did you start supporting Newcastle ? Yep, I also posted when and why in a previous thread although that has absolutely nothing to do with you de railing threads with your constant ramblings you have the knowledge and outlook of an 8 year old. You only think its "derailing" because you don't agree. What i say will stand the test of time. Just me?? You really are mental anyone who seriously thinks Mike Ashley will ever match the Halls and Shepherd is mental chum. Anyone who can't see the game has fundamentaly changed and the "Halls (Dougie) and Shepherd" could never have matched the "Hall (SJH)" years is similarly mental. I don't recall anybody saying that 5 years or so ago as the reason for wanting them replaced. Did you know Man City were going to be taken over by a bunch of Arabs ? You should have went to the bookies. I also don't see Man City being taken over by a bunch of Arabs as a reason for NUFC to become a selling club again like they were in the 70's and 80's, competing with the lower level premiership clubs, but I'm sure you will continue to kid yourself differently., and justify your hatred of Fred, like all the other numpties on other message boards and here who also are spouting the same line. Anybody but Fred would do better than this, is what you all said. So when exactly is this somebody going to do better, all he has done so far is sell our best players, get relegated and drop the average league position massively as well as seeing levels of interest in the club also go down in terms of sponsorship and other revenues including match tickets. You also said for a long time that you would review your views of Mike Ashley after the 1st September and the summer transfer deadline. What is your new appraisal ? We know you thought he would spend the Carroll cash, as you said in your own words "he is now in a position to spend for the first time", putting you in a position where you could have then said "who's showing ambition now then ?" [obvious as fuck tbh], but as it didn't happen [as some of us told you] what is your appraisal now ? This is a genuine question. You said this for a long time. What is your new appraisal, and justify whatever you are going to say. Stop moving the goalposts, and contribute a reply to a genuine constructive question. How many times Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lake Bells tits 1 Posted December 9, 2011 Author Share Posted December 9, 2011 why isnt tecato responding to my thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 One thread which Leazes comments won't de rail are you really 38 ? When did you start supporting Newcastle ? Yep, I also posted when and why in a previous thread although that has absolutely nothing to do with you de railing threads with your constant ramblings you have the knowledge and outlook of an 8 year old. You only think its "derailing" because you don't agree. What i say will stand the test of time. Just me?? You really are mental anyone who seriously thinks Mike Ashley will ever match the Halls and Shepherd is mental chum. Anyone who can't see the game has fundamentaly changed and the "Halls (Dougie) and Shepherd" could never have matched the "Hall (SJH)" years is similarly mental. I don't recall anybody saying that 5 years or so ago as the reason for wanting them replaced. Did you know Man City were going to be taken over by a bunch of Arabs ? You should have went to the bookies. I also don't see Man City being taken over by a bunch of Arabs as a reason for NUFC to become a selling club again like they were in the 70's and 80's, competing with the lower level premiership clubs, but I'm sure you will continue to kid yourself differently., and justify your hatred of Fred, like all the other numpties on other message boards and here who also are spouting the same line. Anybody but Fred would do better than this, is what you all said. So when exactly is this somebody going to do better, all he has done so far is sell our best players, get relegated and drop the average league position massively as well as seeing levels of interest in the club also go down in terms of sponsorship and other revenues including match tickets. You also said for a long time that you would review your views of Mike Ashley after the 1st September and the summer transfer deadline. What is your new appraisal ? We know you thought he would spend the Carroll cash, as you said in your own words "he is now in a position to spend for the first time", putting you in a position where you could have then said "who's showing ambition now then ?" [obvious as fuck tbh], but as it didn't happen [as some of us told you] what is your appraisal now ? This is a genuine question. You said this for a long time. What is your new appraisal, and justify whatever you are going to say. Stop moving the goalposts, and contribute a reply to a genuine constructive question. How many times sadly, I didn't think you would have it in you to reply truthfully and honestly, to what were in fact your very own comments which you posted many times between January and August. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaythesouthernmag 0 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 One thread which Leazes comments won't de rail are you really 38 ? When did you start supporting Newcastle ? Yep, I also posted when and why in a previous thread although that has absolutely nothing to do with you de railing threads with your constant ramblings you have the knowledge and outlook of an 8 year old. You only think its "derailing" because you don't agree. What i say will stand the test of time. Just me?? You really are mental anyone who seriously thinks Mike Ashley will ever match the Halls and Shepherd is mental chum. Never said he would chum but i, unlike you, accept the playing fields are not as level as they used to be and in current circumstances we will not be challenging the top 4. Accept it and move on, enjoy the football and remember all the good times you had with Fred I'll be polite about this and say the situation has been explained dozens of times. A different era, but the opposition is the same, Newcastle United are the same club, the last regime met their competitors and achieved a lot for the club, the new regime is not rising to meet their competitors in the same way. Quite how people like you think that 7th for the last regime is failure [considering where they started] and 7th for Ashley is the pinnacle, is quite beyond any sort of logic. I won't expand further. Trophyshy has a point, I'll try and point these things out in a more constructive fashion. Although calling a spade a spade is something I've always done and don't see the harm in it. I seriously can't believe you don't think the opposition has changed and the finances of the likes of City,Chelsea,Man U and to a certain extent the dippers has influenced how football works and until you do its pretty pointless either myself or anyone else trying to debate it with you I told you a few weeks ago that you will never, ever, anywhere find any post from me saying I expect Mike Ashley to fund the club in the manner that Man City and Chelsea are. Fuck me sideways, why don't you read properly and understand properly. Newcastle United selling their best players and the owner pocketing the cash or directing it elsewhere, and not backing his manager, and competing at the levels of the lower premiership also-rans, is a different matter entirely. I have said to trophyshy that I will try and ignore posts like this, but you really are the limit. How many more times does this need to be explained ? Lower premiership also rans?? Haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Lower premiership also rans?? Haha indeed, if you can look beyond a dozen games or so. It would appear that you can't, which prompts the question, how long exactly have you supported Newcastle United and how knowledgeable and perceptive are you about football ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaythesouthernmag 0 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 As a matter of interest Leazes where do you consider also rans? Outside the top 4? Top 6? Bottom 6? Just to clarify chum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 As a matter of interest Leazes where do you consider also rans? Outside the top 4? Top 6? Bottom 6? Just to clarify chum in the long term chum, the top half of the league is considered success by your man, which is exactly my point. His sidekick has said so, and the setup of the club is such that this is the highest aim. Only people who don't spend their cash on the club and watch it on TV will be ultimately happy with that, people who go to games will drift away, and a dozen games doesn't change that one iota. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 "Stop moving the goalposts" We're on a different pitch, nevermind a shift in the position of the goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaythesouthernmag 0 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 (edited) As a matter of interest Leazes where do you consider also rans? Outside the top 4? Top 6? Bottom 6? Just to clarify chum in the long term chum, the top half of the league is considered success by your man, which is exactly my point. His sidekick has said so, and the setup of the club is such that this is the highest aim. Only people who don't spend their cash on the club and watch it on TV will be ultimately happy with that, people who go to games will drift away, and a dozen games doesn't change that one iota. Why refer to him as my man? The question was where do you, Leazes Mag, consider as being also ran?? Edited December 9, 2011 by jaythesouthernmag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 As a matter of interest Leazes where do you consider also rans? Outside the top 4? Top 6? Bottom 6? Just to clarify chum in the long term chum, the top half of the league is considered success by your man, which is exactly my point. His sidekick has said so, and the setup of the club is such that this is the highest aim. Only people who don't spend their cash on the club and watch it on TV will be ultimately happy with that, people who go to games will drift away, and a dozen games doesn't change that one iota. Why refer to him as my man? The question was where do you, Leazes Mag, consider as being also ran?? setting survival as your aim, and mid table as success ? Selling your best players and pocketing the cash ? That may be fine for small clubs like Bolton, Blackburn etc, but not Newcastle. That is the actions of also rans, with limited ambitions, and small 20000 stadiums, struggling to fill them, and accepting you are unable to challenge the other major clubs, this is the mindset Mike Ashley has imposed on many of you, most of whom don't go to games so you accept it more readily. I really don't know why I'm trying to explain this to you again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaythesouthernmag 0 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 As a matter of interest Leazes where do you consider also rans? Outside the top 4? Top 6? Bottom 6? Just to clarify chum in the long term chum, the top half of the league is considered success by your man, which is exactly my point. His sidekick has said so, and the setup of the club is such that this is the highest aim. Only people who don't spend their cash on the club and watch it on TV will be ultimately happy with that, people who go to games will drift away, and a dozen games doesn't change that one iota. Why refer to him as my man? The question was where do you, Leazes Mag, consider as being also ran?? setting survival as your aim, and mid table as success ? Selling your best players and pocketing the cash ? That may be fine for small clubs like Bolton, Blackburn etc, but not Newcastle. That is the actions of also rans, with limited ambitions, and small 20000 stadiums, struggling to fill them, and accepting you are unable to challenge the other major clubs, this is the mindset Mike Ashley has imposed on many of you, most of whom don't go to games so you accept it more readily. I really don't know why I'm trying to explain this to you again. So pretty much filling a 50000 stadium, having quality players,being serious contenders for a European spot wouldn't be an also ran then would it? I hate to tell you that's Newcastle As for challenging the major clubs I take it you mean the top 4 who you have already admitted that you don't expect us to compete with?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 jaysouthernmag.....lets just see where the next few years go eh, rather than a dozen games or so. How many games have you seen in the past few years by the way, and previous to that ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now