ewerk 30219 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 I don't actually see the point in the loans with a view to buy approach. If we want the player, buy him now, as his stock has never been lower. Don't get him in on loan and get him back on form, then start talking transfer fees. Any transfer fee would be agreed before we take him on loan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44250 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Any transfer fee would be agreed before we take him on loan. Well all that will change if he blows someone up in a shopping centre, CAPTAIN NAIVE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 6985 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 (edited) Ssn reporting that Liverpool will only sell rather than loan Edited July 16, 2012 by J69 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Rodgers made to look a mug. They would never have undermined Dalglish like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 17060 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Rodgers made to look a mug. They would never have undermined Dalglish like that. Nearly all clubs like a coach who just does coaching nowadays..Fergie is the last "top to bottom" manager left now, the rest are just some slightly unusual form of middle mangers who have to motivate millionaires on a daily basis. Good luck with that Brendan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney 0 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Newcastle are ready to make a £13million swoop to bring Andy Carroll back to the club. They have already failed with a loan move to take the Liverpool striker on for the season. Liverpool, who bought Carroll from Newcastle in a record-breaking £35million deal 18 months ago, flatly rejected the offer but it is now clear they are ready to offload their No 9. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2174298/Newcastle-prepare-13m-bid-Andy-Carroll.html#ixzz20nNXIpom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney 0 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Christ, that's illegible. Basically a couple of sources including the Mail have said we're going in with a £13m bid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 34782 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 How to make Carroll feel wanted: we won't loan you because we want to sell you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44250 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 That picture is dreamy. If he does come back, I hope he just shuts the fuck up about why he left. I don't care what the truth is, I just don't want to hear all the "I never wanted to leave" patter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney 0 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Not all of us are so assured and self-confident, Gemmill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21794 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 he can come back on the condition that he gets down the barber and has that ridiculous mane cut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney 0 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 oh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio 0 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Thats the figure most quoted so it may well be around that mark. If he comes next season I dare say Smith's wagesw for next season will cover most of it. Then you're fucked mind. He'll want four or five years at 3-4 million a year That means finding the transfer fee (15 mill? will one years tv money cover that?) and selling one of Tiote, Cabaye or Cisse to cover his wages. Put like that I think they should try to sign the best young striker in France for 5mill and pay him 30k a week. As per "the model" #olympiquelyonnais Why would Smith's wage only cover Carroll's for a year?I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio 0 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 That picture is dreamy. If he does come back, I hope he just shuts the fuck up about why he left. I don't care what the truth is, I just don't want to hear all the "I never wanted to leave" patter. The club will come up with a story that suits both parties I would have thought, like when Shepherd tried to smooth out a return for Distin when Souness wanted him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 17060 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Why would Smith's wage only cover Carroll's for a year?I I thought he had a year left on his contract?...maybe am wrong.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 7066 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 £13m seems fair to me, perhaps a couple mill below his actual value when they signed him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 6985 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 £13m seems fair to me, perhaps a couple mill below his actual value when they signed him. Sounds like they had a similar amount set aside for De Jong. Wonder if thats our max for a striker this summer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 34782 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 (edited) I thought he had a year left on his contract?...maybe am wrong.. Nah, if he had the bastard would still be here. Can you believe he was here 5 years? Less the loan at the end, which NUFC paid the vast majority of his wages for anyway. Btw, if we re-sign Carroll, will that be all the Carroll money accounted for? Edited July 16, 2012 by alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 I'm as hetero as the next guy but.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogerbarton 24 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 (edited) I think it is a big draw to have a geordie in the team. The way things are going, we'll struggle even to field any English players in our starting XI. Are there any rules against this in this country? Edited July 16, 2012 by rogerbarton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4713 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 I think it is a big drawer to have a geordie in the team. The way things are going, we'll struggle even to field any English players in our starting XI. Are there any rules against this in this country? there are homegrown player rules for the squad but no, you can field a first 11 with no enligsh players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney 0 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogerbarton 24 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Ha ha. Reading it back I realised my mistake. I did a degree in English too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogerbarton 24 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 How many homegrown players do we need in the squad like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4713 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 8 in the 25 man squad A Home Grown player will be defined as one who, irrespective of his nationality or age, has been registered with any club affiliated to the Football Association or the Football Association of Wales for a period, continuous or not, of three entire seasons or 36 months prior to his 21st birthday (or the end of the season during which he turns 21). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now