Christmas Tree 4826 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 Just saw that about Lord McAlpine on the beeb. It doesn't strike me as the sort of statement you'd make if you were guilty. I think it also shows the difficulty of trying to prosecute people after all these years when you've only got witness testimony. Also how horrific it must be if its not true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CleeToonFan 1 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 I like how he seems more bothered about the fact he's been alleged to wear aftershave and drive a Rolls Royce, and the charges merely come as an afterthought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35574 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 (edited) I like how he seems more bothered about the fact he's been alleged to wear aftershave and drive a Rolls Royce, and the charges merely come as an afterthought. I assume (hope) you're taking the piss but, just in case, he's citing those facts as evidence that it wasn't him (they were details mentioned in the allegations) rather than because the notion that people think he had a roller or likes a bit of eau de cologne bothers him. Edited November 9, 2012 by Alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CleeToonFan 1 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 'I HAVE NEVER EVER BEEN IN A HOTEL IN OR EVEN NEAR WREXHAM! Bloody Wrexham in cologne? What do you take me for? Besides, I didnt get a chance to abuse him, the frigid bastard didn't put out!' ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31200 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 So the fella who reckoned he was touched up by Lord McAlpine has now admitted that it was mistaken identity. What a cunt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4826 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 So the fella who reckoned he was touched up by Lord McAlpine has now admitted that it was mistaken identity. What a cunt. No way? Thats fucking terrible if thats true. or Paid off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4411 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 (edited) The police showed him a picture in 1990 and told him it was Lord McAlpine and he identified him as the abuser. Now "luckily" McAlpine appears on TV to deny it and the bloke says "hang on, that's not him" - maybe it isn't the bloke who's a cunt, its the coppers. Edited November 9, 2012 by NJS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31200 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 (edited) The police showed him a picture in 1990 and told him it was Lord McAlpine and he identified him as the abuser. Now "luckily" McAlpine appears on TV to deny it and the bloke says "hang on, that's not him" - maybe it isn't the bloke who's a cunt, its the coppers. You reckon he hasn't seen a photo of his supposed abuser in the last 20 years? Edited November 9, 2012 by ewerk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4411 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 You reckon he hasn't seen a photo of his supposed abuser in the last 20 years? I dunno - he's been out of the public eye so you'd have to look out for him - I wouldn't know what a random Lord looked like. Of course why he didn't seek confrontation at any time is another question - even if I had no faith in the law I'd be tempted to have a go if I'd been him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31200 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 I dunno - he's been out of the public eye so you'd have to look out for him - I wouldn't know what a random Lord looked like. Of course why he didn't seek confrontation at any time is another question - even if I had no faith in the law I'd be tempted to have a go if I'd been him. The internet? It doesn't take much to google his name. I'd be tempted to do that before going to the police. Seems like a cunt out to make a few quid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4411 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 As I read it he went to the coppers years ago, not recently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTurk 0 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 The bloke accused him of being a pedo in public. If he wasn't doing that on the basis of eye-witness testimony compared to what this guy looks like now, he's a royal cunt no matter what he was subjected to as a kid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31200 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 As I read it he went to the coppers years ago, not recently. His story was that he went to the police twenty odd years ago and they showed him a picture of his abuser and told him it was Lord McAlpine. Then he claims that it was only yesterday he was shown a picture of Lord McAlpine and realised he wasn't his abuser. That sound realistic to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7169 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 Nope. The illuminati have got to him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 The bigger fish have immunity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10963 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 I'm immune! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7169 Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 The bigger fish have immunity. From who? The NWO? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4826 Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 Be nice to see that irritating wanker Schofield have to give an on air grovelling apology as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10963 Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 Be nice to see that irritating wanker Schofield have to give an on air grovelling apology as well. In this time, when all politicians are so polished, so sanitised, isn't there an argument to be made for surprise tactics by interviewers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4826 Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 In this time, when all politicians are so polished, so sanitised, isn't there an argument to be made for surprise tactics by interviewers? All well and good if you're right, but brandishing people peados on TV, who arnt Peados..... Deserves the chop IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10963 Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 All well and good if you're right, but brandishing people peados on TV, who arnt Peados..... Deserves the chop IMO. I didn't watch, did Schofield actually name names or, as has been described to me, did he pass the PM a list of names? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 All well and good if you're right, but brandishing people peados on TV, who arnt Peados..... Deserves the chop IMO. Part of the scam that is being perpetrated now ie bungling the investigations and ad hoc misinformation and smoke and mirrors. They laugh how gullible the public are and how misdirection will be enough. It will be almost like the paedo's are being persecuted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7169 Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 All well and good if you're right, but brandishing people peados on TV, who arnt Peados..... Deserves the chop IMO. Your grasp of the English language deserves the chop! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 17649 Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 Part of the scam that is being perpetrated now ie bungling the investigations and ad hoc misinformation and smoke and mirrors. They laugh how gullible the public are and how misdirection will be enough. It will be almost like the paedo's are being persecuted. So you're of the opinion that the various claims on the internet have some basis, and theres a bit of a operation going on by "the establishment" to muddy the waters and and in so doing protect those who have been abusing kids for decades?... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7169 Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 You realise Parky is just a more articulate Wolfy don't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now