Gemmill 44996 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 If she didn't flush the toilet, she probably didn't wash her hands, which is a game changer and casts fresh doubt over her acquittal imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Nearly cost Bridget the safest Labour seat in Parliament. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Probably a sit-down wiper and a night before showerer as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Probably a sit-down wiper and a night before showerer as well. Â Damn her!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Probably a sit-down wiper and a night before showerer as well. Â Didn't SLP tick both of those boxes the scruffy little bastard wot he is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin S. Assilleekunt 1 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 I start off wiping sat down and eventually end up standing up and adopting all sorts of bow-legged poses in a futile attempt to end the trail of destruction. Never killed anyone though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Free at Last: The 'Knox One' Out! Â As the papers are long overdue proclaiming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin S. Assilleekunt 1 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Just to pre-empt this query, we've gone over before how I am not homophobic in the slightest, I fully support gay-rights (bought every Right Said Fred album etc) and have got very hot under the collar defending the gays in heated arguments with homophobes. Having said that, I just don't know how the gays manage all this anal--I'm just going off my experiences with my own arse and defecating in my lifetime, do people who are into anal douche their bottoms out before sex with a portable enema or something? What is the process? I've seen interviews with pornstars who say if the girls eat on the day of an anal scene it will likely cause an 'accident'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock Manson 0 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Just to pre-empt this query, we've gone over before how I am not homophobic in the slightest, I fully support gay-rights (bought every Right Said Fred album etc) and have got very hot under the collar defending the gays in heated arguments with homophobes. Having said that, I just don't know how the gays manage all this anal--I'm just going off my experiences with my own arse and defecating in my lifetime, do people who are into anal douche their bottoms out before sex with a portable enema or something? What is the process? I've seen interviews with pornstars who say if the girls eat on the day of an anal scene it will likely cause an 'accident'. Â Lived with a gay guy - great bloke but very promiscuous. He acted as our envoy into the Nottingham gay scene (ooo chase me, chase me!). Apparently douching is the norm, and people in the gay circle know who douches and who doesn't before a trip to brown town. Â But rather than delve into the realms of Saltwater territory, can we keep the focus back on Foxy Knoxy? The sister Deanna is also effin' stunning! Can't post a pic because I'm at work but look her up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30682 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Â Neither of them are particularly hot imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock Manson 0 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Â Neither of them are particularly hot imo. Â Do you douche? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 The patter about it being a blow to the Kercher family, I find a bit weird. There's still a bloke in prison who I gather confessed. Why would the Kerchers want these other two in there if there's no evidence they were involved? Â Media shit-storm IYAM. The Kercher's have not said one thing about these two being release. Just that they don't want the memory of Meredith to be lost in the midst of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 7083 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Is this where the term douche-bag comes from? Â People carrying a little kit around so they can be ready to be buggered at the drop of a hat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 10 factors that helped Knox's case 1. Reasonable doubt Amanda Knox's lawyers managed to instil reasonable doubt in the jurors' minds over the quality of testing of the bra clasp belonging to Meredith Kercher - which it was claimed had Raffaele Sollecito's DNA on it - and the knife that prosecutors argued was the murder weapon. The prosecution maintained Knox's DNA was on the handle of the kitchen knife, with Ms Kercher's DNA on the blade. The defence claimed that the amount of Meredith Kercher's DNA on the blade was too small to test. An independent review disputed the prosecution's claims.  2. Crime scene errors A few police crime scene errors, such as contaminated samples, lost evidence and disputed procedures, were successfully portrayed as generalised incompetence. An independent review raised doubt over the attribution of some of the DNA traces, which were collected from the crime scene 46 days after the murder.  3. Lack of proof There was no convincing proof that Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito were actually in the room when Meredith Kercher died. Even the presence of Amanda Knox's blood and footprints in the house were successfully explained away. Her defence claimed that Knox's blood could have been there because she was a resident at the farm house on Pergola Road. The evidence of Rudy Guede against Knox was also confusing. Guede, who is serving a prison sentence for sexual assault and murder, said that he heard her voice at the scene but didn't see her face.  4. Motive There was no credible motive for the murder. The prosecution stuck doggedly to the sex-game-gone-wrong explanation even though their own medical examiner said there was no evidence of rape in the days following the murder. An alternative motive, involving robbery, gained traction as the case rolled on, based on the unexplained disappearance of Meredith Kercher's 200 euro rent money.  5. Unreliable witness One of the key witnesses at the original trial, a homeless man called Antonio Curatolo, publicly admitted to being a heroin addict, undermining his observations that he saw Knox acting suspiciously by the scene of the crime on the night of the murder in November 2007.  6. Character Knox claimed that some of the evidence put forward against her - stories about her strange behaviour after she was arrested and the prosecution's focus on her sexuality - was no more than an attempt to demonise her to cover up for a weak case.  7. PR campaign Knox's family hired a Seattle public relations specialist, David Marriot, who for months repeatedly plugged the line: "Amanda will get out, it's a done deal." This created a self-propagating media frenzy, which - in the end - helped convince a largely sceptical Italian media.  8. Supporters' presence The massive presence of friends and family in Perugia in support fuelled the "Amanda is innocent" campaign. Italians have claimed that because Knox is American, the case has been handled differently, so as not to offend the US.  9. Appeals process The Italian appeals process offers more guarantees to defendants than any other legal system in the world, whereby only the weakest evidence is treated, not the whole case. Knox's team only had to attack the DNA evidence against her to undermine the whole edifice of the original trial. Italy has one of lowest prison populations in the world because of its lenient appeals process.  10. Favourable political climate Silvio Berlusconi's government vowed to tame his country's fiercely independent system of magistrates - one that had been bolstered to fight the mafia. The more the government shows the magistracy to be incompetent the better for Mr Berlusconi. The ministry of justice is poised to investigate what went wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 10 factors that helped Knox's case 1. Reasonable doubt Amanda Knox's lawyers managed to instil reasonable doubt in the jurors' minds over the quality of testing of the bra clasp belonging to Meredith Kercher - which it was claimed had Raffaele Sollecito's DNA on it - and the knife that prosecutors argued was the murder weapon. The prosecution maintained Knox's DNA was on the handle of the kitchen knife, with Ms Kercher's DNA on the blade. The defence claimed that the amount of Meredith Kercher's DNA on the blade was too small to test. An independent review disputed the prosecution's claims.  2. Crime scene errors A few police crime scene errors, such as contaminated samples, lost evidence and disputed procedures, were successfully portrayed as generalised incompetence. An independent review raised doubt over the attribution of some of the DNA traces, which were collected from the crime scene 46 days after the murder.  3. Lack of proof There was no convincing proof that Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito were actually in the room when Meredith Kercher died. Even the presence of Amanda Knox's blood and footprints in the house were successfully explained away. Her defence claimed that Knox's blood could have been there because she was a resident at the farm house on Pergola Road. The evidence of Rudy Guede against Knox was also confusing. Guede, who is serving a prison sentence for sexual assault and murder, said that he heard her voice at the scene but didn't see her face.  4. Motive There was no credible motive for the murder. The prosecution stuck doggedly to the sex-game-gone-wrong explanation even though their own medical examiner said there was no evidence of rape in the days following the murder. An alternative motive, involving robbery, gained traction as the case rolled on, based on the unexplained disappearance of Meredith Kercher's 200 euro rent money.  5. Unreliable witness One of the key witnesses at the original trial, a homeless man called Antonio Curatolo, publicly admitted to being a heroin addict, undermining his observations that he saw Knox acting suspiciously by the scene of the crime on the night of the murder in November 2007.  6. Character Knox claimed that some of the evidence put forward against her - stories about her strange behaviour after she was arrested and the prosecution's focus on her sexuality - was no more than an attempt to demonise her to cover up for a weak case.  7. PR campaign Knox's family hired a Seattle public relations specialist, David Marriot, who for months repeatedly plugged the line: "Amanda will get out, it's a done deal." This created a self-propagating media frenzy, which - in the end - helped convince a largely sceptical Italian media.  8. Supporters' presence The massive presence of friends and family in Perugia in support fuelled the "Amanda is innocent" campaign. Italians have claimed that because Knox is American, the case has been handled differently, so as not to offend the US.  9. Appeals process The Italian appeals process offers more guarantees to defendants than any other legal system in the world, whereby only the weakest evidence is treated, not the whole case. Knox's team only had to attack the DNA evidence against her to undermine the whole edifice of the original trial. Italy has one of lowest prison populations in the world because of its lenient appeals process.  10. Favourable political climate Silvio Berlusconi's government vowed to tame his country's fiercely independent system of magistrates - one that had been bolstered to fight the mafia. The more the government shows the magistracy to be incompetent the better for Mr Berlusconi. The ministry of justice is poised to investigate what went wrong.  About 6 of those categories come under the heading 'reasoanble doubt' btw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Â Neither of them are particularly hot imo. Nah, you're right. Both would scrape in to the "they'd dee" category though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 10 factors that helped Knox's case 1. Reasonable doubt Amanda Knox's lawyers managed to instil reasonable doubt in the jurors' minds over the quality of testing of the bra clasp belonging to Meredith Kercher - which it was claimed had Raffaele Sollecito's DNA on it - and the knife that prosecutors argued was the murder weapon. The prosecution maintained Knox's DNA was on the handle of the kitchen knife, with Ms Kercher's DNA on the blade. The defence claimed that the amount of Meredith Kercher's DNA on the blade was too small to test. An independent review disputed the prosecution's claims.  2. Crime scene errors A few police crime scene errors, such as contaminated samples, lost evidence and disputed procedures, were successfully portrayed as generalised incompetence. An independent review raised doubt over the attribution of some of the DNA traces, which were collected from the crime scene 46 days after the murder.  3. Lack of proof There was no convincing proof that Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito were actually in the room when Meredith Kercher died. Even the presence of Amanda Knox's blood and footprints in the house were successfully explained away. Her defence claimed that Knox's blood could have been there because she was a resident at the farm house on Pergola Road. The evidence of Rudy Guede against Knox was also confusing. Guede, who is serving a prison sentence for sexual assault and murder, said that he heard her voice at the scene but didn't see her face.  4. Motive There was no credible motive for the murder. The prosecution stuck doggedly to the sex-game-gone-wrong explanation even though their own medical examiner said there was no evidence of rape in the days following the murder. An alternative motive, involving robbery, gained traction as the case rolled on, based on the unexplained disappearance of Meredith Kercher's 200 euro rent money.  5. Unreliable witness One of the key witnesses at the original trial, a homeless man called Antonio Curatolo, publicly admitted to being a heroin addict, undermining his observations that he saw Knox acting suspiciously by the scene of the crime on the night of the murder in November 2007.  6. Character Knox claimed that some of the evidence put forward against her - stories about her strange behaviour after she was arrested and the prosecution's focus on her sexuality - was no more than an attempt to demonise her to cover up for a weak case.  7. PR campaign Knox's family hired a Seattle public relations specialist, David Marriot, who for months repeatedly plugged the line: "Amanda will get out, it's a done deal." This created a self-propagating media frenzy, which - in the end - helped convince a largely sceptical Italian media.  8. Supporters' presence The massive presence of friends and family in Perugia in support fuelled the "Amanda is innocent" campaign. Italians have claimed that because Knox is American, the case has been handled differently, so as not to offend the US.  9. Appeals process The Italian appeals process offers more guarantees to defendants than any other legal system in the world, whereby only the weakest evidence is treated, not the whole case. Knox's team only had to attack the DNA evidence against her to undermine the whole edifice of the original trial. Italy has one of lowest prison populations in the world because of its lenient appeals process.  10. Favourable political climate Silvio Berlusconi's government vowed to tame his country's fiercely independent system of magistrates - one that had been bolstered to fight the mafia. The more the government shows the magistracy to be incompetent the better for Mr Berlusconi. The ministry of justice is poised to investigate what went wrong. Look like the mafia are so ingrained in Italian society they even have played a massive part in the judicial system ethic as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Â Neither of them are particularly hot imo. Nah, you're right. Both would scrape in to the "they'd dee" category though. The one on the right would be alright without the birthmark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin S. Assilleekunt 1 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Both pretty enough lasses, I prefer that type to the peroxide blondes with 1 inch of makeup and baked in a sunbed for 5 hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Just to pre-empt this query, we've gone over before how I am not homophobic in the slightest, I fully support gay-rights (bought every Right Said Fred album etc) and have got very hot under the collar defending the gays in heated arguments with homophobes. Having said that, I just don't know how the gays manage all this anal--I'm just going off my experiences with my own arse and defecating in my lifetime, do people who are into anal douche their bottoms out before sex with a portable enema or something? What is the process? I've seen interviews with pornstars who say if the girls eat on the day of an anal scene it will likely cause an 'accident'. Â I heard after a certain amount of anal some have to start wearing tampons to stop leakage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Apparently there's a real place called Cockup Bottom. Careful googling that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lake Bells tits 1 Posted October 4, 2011 Author Share Posted October 4, 2011 Both pretty enough lasses, I prefer that type to the peroxide blondes with 1 inch of makeup and baked in a sunbed for 5 hours. Â +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEADMAN 0 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 is knox innocent the tears seemed genuine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 7083 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 (edited) what is it with lasses and crying? Edited October 4, 2011 by trophyshy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEADMAN 0 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 the first pic looked nice she has a cute pair lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now