Topic: T00nClips (Shameless self plug)

[manc-mag 1]

Is anyone surprised like? The man has been Fish's personal tour guide for 24 hours, you don't come out of that experience without deep emotional scars.

[ChezGiven 0]

I did wonder if there was history behind it, did seem quite an angry outburst.

I questioned the claim that SD gets all advertising for free at SJP based on it not making sense from a tax perspective, the fact that SD shareholders bear 40% of the cost and that the evidence from the accounts is not conclusive. At no point did i say either wasy was a fact as this was a discussion from principles and what made sense from a business perspective. It was a good chat, mainly between myself and YNH which benefitted the whole forum by clarifying what was known and what was not.

 

Not only was it a moronic outburst, it doesnt even reflect on what was said in the discussion. The under value comment may be based on me trying to differentiate commercially between a sign on a roof and naming a stadium. The real commercial reference is of course the per metre charge for Shepherd Offshore and Cameron Hall Development signs that used to be everywhere.

 

All this because i wanted to help 2J with a youtube upload.

[Gejon 2]

I did wonder if there was history behind it, did seem quite an angry outburst.

I questioned the claim that SD gets all advertising for free at SJP based on it not making sense from a tax perspective, the fact that SD shareholders bear 40% of the cost and that the evidence from the accounts is not conclusive. At no point did i say either wasy was a fact as this was a discussion from principles and what made sense from a business perspective. It was a good chat, mainly between myself and YNH which benefitted the whole forum by clarifying what was known and what was not.

 

Not only was it a moronic outburst, it doesnt even reflect on what was said in the discussion. The under value comment may be based on me trying to differentiate commercially between a sign on a roof and naming a stadium. The real commercial reference is of course the per metre charge for Shepherd Offshore and Cameron Hall Development signs that used to be everywhere.

 

All this because i wanted to help 2J with a youtube upload.

 

 

I hope a lesson has been learnt.

[sammynb 3517]

I did wonder if there was history behind it, did seem quite an angry outburst.

I questioned the claim that SD gets all advertising for free at SJP based on it not making sense from a tax perspective, the fact that SD shareholders bear 40% of the cost and that the evidence from the accounts is not conclusive. At no point did i say either wasy was a fact as this was a discussion from principles and what made sense from a business perspective. It was a good chat, mainly between myself and YNH which benefitted the whole forum by clarifying what was known and what was not.

 

Not only was it a moronic outburst, it doesnt even reflect on what was said in the discussion. The under value comment may be based on me trying to differentiate commercially between a sign on a roof and naming a stadium. The real commercial reference is of course the per metre charge for Shepherd Offshore and Cameron Hall Development signs that used to be everywhere.

 

All this because i wanted to help 2J with a youtube upload.

 

To be honest I don't know why I feel the need to squabble with chez whom I once thought was a decent poster; now all I can read is an Ashley apologist who may be knowledgeable on many things financial but like CT, albeit an alleged thinking man's version, continues to post as an expert on many things he knows nowt about.

 

Maybe it's the result of the influx of mong the board has suffered over the last 12 month, most likely it's just me, regardless I know the solution to seeing red every time I read his posts.

[manc-mag 1]

I did wonder if there was history behind it, did seem quite an angry outburst.

I questioned the claim that SD gets all advertising for free at SJP based on it not making sense from a tax perspective, the fact that SD shareholders bear 40% of the cost and that the evidence from the accounts is not conclusive. At no point did i say either wasy was a fact as this was a discussion from principles and what made sense from a business perspective. It was a good chat, mainly between myself and YNH which benefitted the whole forum by clarifying what was known and what was not.

 

Not only was it a moronic outburst, it doesnt even reflect on what was said in the discussion. The under value comment may be based on me trying to differentiate commercially between a sign on a roof and naming a stadium. The real commercial reference is of course the per metre charge for Shepherd Offshore and Cameron Hall Development signs that used to be everywhere.

 

All this because i wanted to help 2J with a youtube upload.

 

To be honest I don't know why I feel the need to squabble with chez whom I once thought was a decent poster; now all I can read is an Ashley apologist who may be knowledgeable on many things financial but like CT, albeit an alleged thinking man's version, continues to post as an expert on many things he knows nowt about.

 

Maybe it's the result of the influx of mong the board has suffered over the last 12 month, most likely it's just me, regardless I know the solution to seeing red every time I read his posts.

 

 

Chez-the 'thinking man's' CT What a fucking label, that has got to stick! It's too unjust for it not to.

[ChezGiven 0]

I did wonder if there was history behind it, did seem quite an angry outburst.

I questioned the claim that SD gets all advertising for free at SJP based on it not making sense from a tax perspective, the fact that SD shareholders bear 40% of the cost and that the evidence from the accounts is not conclusive. At no point did i say either wasy was a fact as this was a discussion from principles and what made sense from a business perspective. It was a good chat, mainly between myself and YNH which benefitted the whole forum by clarifying what was known and what was not.

 

Not only was it a moronic outburst, it doesnt even reflect on what was said in the discussion. The under value comment may be based on me trying to differentiate commercially between a sign on a roof and naming a stadium. The real commercial reference is of course the per metre charge for Shepherd Offshore and Cameron Hall Development signs that used to be everywhere.

 

All this because i wanted to help 2J with a youtube upload.

 

To be honest I don't know why I feel the need to squabble with chez whom I once thought was a decent poster; now all I can read is an Ashley apologist who may be knowledgeable on many things financial but like CT, albeit an alleged thinking man's version, continues to post as an expert on many things he knows nowt about.

Maybe it's the result of the influx of mong the board has suffered over the last 12 month, most likely it's just me, regardless I know the solution to seeing red every time I read his posts.

Give me examples of this please. I asked Gloomy the same and he wasnt able to provide it.

 

If you do see red maybe its because you're a bit emotionally retarded and cant fathom the existence of opinions that dont align perfectly with your own.

[Happy Face 29]

To be fair to Chez, despite his faith that we'd keep Carroll and that we'd spend the money we got, he's only looking at things from a business perspective...and has said he can't see the sense in the more recent dealings which most expected but that he didn't.

 

Terms like "Ashley apologist" are a bit OTT when Ashley is just a bloke trying to run the club to the best of his ability. He's not an evil bastard making decisions based on how it'll hurt the fans most. He's just inept and inexperienced in the world of football and can't see the untapped potential of the area which he could afford to unleash.

 

Polarising the discussion into team positive and team negative, whereby all is rosy on one side and everything is dastardly on the other doesn't give a realistic view from either side. As always it's somewhere in the middle, and Chez gets this balance right more than most.

 

EDIT: Ashley apologist does apply to CT of course, who supports every decision no matter whether he agrees with it or not, usually deciding he agrees with it after stating he disagrees.

Edited September 19, 2011 by Happy Face

[manc-mag 1]

To be fair to Chez, despite his faith that we'd keep Carroll and that we'd spend the money we got, he's only looking at things from a business perspective...and has said he can't see the sense in the more recent dealings which most expected but that he didn't.

 

Terms like "Ashley apologist" are a bit OTT when Ashley is just a bloke trying to run the club to the best of his ability. He's not an evil bastard making decisions based on how it'll hurt the fans most. He's just inept and inexperienced in the world of football and can't see the untapped potential of the area which he could afford to unleash.

 

Polarising the discussion into team positive and team negative, whereby all is rosy on one side and everything is dastardly on the other doesn't give a realistic view from either side. As always it's somewhere in the middle, and Chez gets this balance right more than most.

 

EDIT: Ashley apologist does apply to CT of course, who supports every decision no matter whether he agrees with it or not, usually deciding he agrees with it after stating he disagrees.

 

Nicely summarised imho.

[sammynb 3517]

Give me examples of this please. I asked Gloomy the same and he wasnt able to provide it.

 

If you do see red maybe its because you're a bit emotionally retarded and cant fathom the existence of opinions that dont align perfectly with your own.

 

See I almost bothered but you and the rest of the Ashley apologists are not worth the bandwidth.

[Guest alex]

To be fair to Chez, despite his faith that we'd keep Carroll and that we'd spend the money we got, he's only looking at things from a business perspective...and has said he can't see the sense in the more recent dealings which most expected but that he didn't.

 

Terms like "Ashley apologist" are a bit OTT when Ashley is just a bloke trying to run the club to the best of his ability. He's not an evil bastard making decisions based on how it'll hurt the fans most. He's just inept and inexperienced in the world of football and can't see the untapped potential of the area which he could afford to unleash.

 

Polarising the discussion into team positive and team negative, whereby all is rosy on one side and everything is dastardly on the other doesn't give a realistic view from either side. As always it's somewhere in the middle, and Chez gets this balance right more than most.

 

EDIT: Ashley apologist does apply to CT of course, who supports every decision no matter whether he agrees with it or not, usually deciding he agrees with it after stating he disagrees.

[sammynb 3517]

To be fair to Chez, despite his faith that we'd keep Carroll and that we'd spend the money we got, he's only looking at things from a business perspective...and has said he can't see the sense in the more recent dealings which most expected but that he didn't.

 

Terms like "Ashley apologist" are a bit OTT when Ashley is just a bloke trying to run the club to the best of his ability. He's not an evil bastard making decisions based on how it'll hurt the fans most. He's just inept and inexperienced in the world of football and can't see the untapped potential of the area which he could afford to unleash.

 

Polarising the discussion into team positive and team negative, whereby all is rosy on one side and everything is dastardly on the other doesn't give a realistic view from either side. As always it's somewhere in the middle, and Chez gets this balance right more than most.

 

EDIT: Ashley apologist does apply to CT of course, who supports every decision no matter whether he agrees with it or not, usually deciding he agrees with it after stating he disagrees.

 

Well Chez is the alleged thinking man's CT.

[ChezGiven 0]

Thanks mate. My prediction on net spend (10m) was also the median response on the poll on this forum, so the majority felt the same.

 

Just as an addendum, CT was on NO yesterday drawing a comparison betweeen the new SD signs on the East Stand and when sponsorship first went on the shirts The official term is apologymentalist.

[Guest alex]

To be fair to Chez, despite his faith that we'd keep Carroll and that we'd spend the money we got, he's only looking at things from a business perspective...and has said he can't see the sense in the more recent dealings which most expected but that he didn't.

 

Terms like "Ashley apologist" are a bit OTT when Ashley is just a bloke trying to run the club to the best of his ability. He's not an evil bastard making decisions based on how it'll hurt the fans most. He's just inept and inexperienced in the world of football and can't see the untapped potential of the area which he could afford to unleash.

 

Polarising the discussion into team positive and team negative, whereby all is rosy on one side and everything is dastardly on the other doesn't give a realistic view from either side. As always it's somewhere in the middle, and Chez gets this balance right more than most.

 

EDIT: Ashley apologist does apply to CT of course, who supports every decision no matter whether he agrees with it or not, usually deciding he agrees with it after stating he disagrees.

 

Well Chez is the alleged thinking man's CT.

Oxymoron tbh.

[ChezGiven 0]

Give me examples of this please. I asked Gloomy the same and he wasnt able to provide it.

 

If you do see red maybe its because you're a bit emotionally retarded and cant fathom the existence of opinions that dont align perfectly with your own.

 

See I almost bothered but you and the rest of the Ashley apologists are not worth the bandwidth.

 

Because you cant give examples, which just makes what you are saying even more hollow. If this is just gentle wumming then fair enough but if you seriously have a problem with something i have posted, quote it and say what the problem is.

[The Fish 10972]

Is anyone surprised like? The man has been Fish's personal tour guide for 24 hours, you don't come out of that experience without deep emotional scars.

[Monroe Transfer 0]

A good old fashioned meltdown. Love it.

[Tom 14013]

Thanks mate. My prediction on net spend (10m) was also the median response on the poll on this forum, so the majority felt the same.

 

Just as an addendum, CT was on NO yesterday drawing a comparison betweeen the new SD signs on the East Stand and when sponsorship first went on the shirts The official term is apologymentalist.

 

Was there even any fuss when the brown ale star first went on the shirts?

[TicTacWoe 0]

This thread was meant to be about youtube videos! Totally gone off topic.

 

Lock it up asap.

[Happy Face 29]

Subscribed

 

[sammynb 3517]

This thread was meant to be about youtube videos! Totally gone off topic.

 

Lock it up asap.

 

It is and btw TooJ's edits are brilliant and it's a shame they are removed by youtube for whatever reasons.

[TicTacWoe 0]

This thread was meant to be about youtube videos! Totally gone off topic.

 

Lock it up asap.

 

It is and btw TooJ's edits are brilliant and it's a shame they are removed by youtube for whatever reasons.

 

Wasn't being entirely serious like Best bet is to put the videos somewhere like Dailymotion of metacafe where they're less likely to be taken down.

[Tooj 17]

Right, seeing as YouTube are already clamping down on things. I'm going to upload everything to my Soccerclips.net account.

[Tooj 17]

Alan Shearer at Newcastle

 

http://www.soccerclips.net/videos/alan-shearer-at-newcastle

[Tooj 17]

NUFC Pride

 

http://www.soccerclips.net/videos/nufc-pride

[Tooj 17]

Peter Beardsley Compilation

 

http://www.soccerclips.net/videos/peter-beardsley