Ketsbaia 0 Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 http://www.guardian.co.uk/argentina/story/...1647762,00.html Daft bint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 43853 Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 Never mind the story! Look at the little bloke in the orange ad at the top - what's all that about?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyluke 2 Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 I've got a different advert. There's one with a bloke doing some hoovering, which is equally disturbing and wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 43853 Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 Keep opening the link. Eventually you'll get a little bloke waving his cock about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyluke 2 Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 No orange ad - just guardian ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 No orange ad - just guardian ones. 69831[/snapback] Aye same for me, just Guardian ones. No doubt something to do with the dodgy cookies on his computer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 172 Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 When I first glanced at the title I thought it said " Thatcher threatend to Nuke the Aussies" For a nano second I respected the bitch ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 Of course the N subs in the S Atlantic didn't carry Trident or even any A bombs........... We could have fired them from the N Atlantic but I'm pretty sure the Yanks have to agree (real cynics believe they have an electronic override on the missiles which are all supplied from the States anyway) Also the PM doesn't actually have total authority to launch - it has to go via the chain of command and I'm pretty sure she would have been in a straight jacket pretty quickly......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 20953 Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 What a load of bollocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 the topic or my post Renton? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 172 Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 the topic or my post Renton? 70040[/snapback] Well, now you mention it...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Nuke him!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Of course the N subs in the S Atlantic didn't carry Trident or even any A bombs........... We could have fired them from the N Atlantic but I'm pretty sure the Yanks have to agree (real cynics believe they have an electronic override on the missiles which are all supplied from the States anyway) Also the PM doesn't actually have total authority to launch - it has to go via the chain of command and I'm pretty sure she would have been in a straight jacket pretty quickly......... 69846[/snapback] The only subs we know that were in S.Atlantic at the time were 'hunter-killer's' which don't carry ICBM's. We will never find out where the Polaris subs (we didn't have Tridents) were at the time (unless an 'insider' tells us!) but they did indeed carry ICBM's. There is no way on earth that we would have nuked Argentina, whether we had the subs there to do it or not. As you say, Maggie would have been in a straight jacket in no time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Of course the N subs in the S Atlantic didn't carry Trident or even any A bombs........... We could have fired them from the N Atlantic but I'm pretty sure the Yanks have to agree (real cynics believe they have an electronic override on the missiles which are all supplied from the States anyway) Also the PM doesn't actually have total authority to launch - it has to go via the chain of command and I'm pretty sure she would have been in a straight jacket pretty quickly......... 69846[/snapback] The only subs we know that were in S.Atlantic at the time were 'hunter-killer's' which don't carry ICBM's. We will never find out where the Polaris subs (we didn't have Tridents) were at the time (unless an 'insider' tells us!) but they did indeed carry ICBM's. There is no way on earth that we would have nuked Argentina, whether we had the subs there to do it or not. As you say, Maggie would have been in a straight jacket in no time. 70209[/snapback] I hope you aren't implying Rob was talking shite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 20953 Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 the topic or my post Renton? 70040[/snapback] I was refferring to the article - it's blatent bullshit and I don't believe a word of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Of course the N subs in the S Atlantic didn't carry Trident or even any A bombs........... We could have fired them from the N Atlantic but I'm pretty sure the Yanks have to agree (real cynics believe they have an electronic override on the missiles which are all supplied from the States anyway) Also the PM doesn't actually have total authority to launch - it has to go via the chain of command and I'm pretty sure she would have been in a straight jacket pretty quickly......... 69846[/snapback] The only subs we know that were in S.Atlantic at the time were 'hunter-killer's' which don't carry ICBM's. We will never find out where the Polaris subs (we didn't have Tridents) were at the time (unless an 'insider' tells us!) but they did indeed carry ICBM's. There is no way on earth that we would have nuked Argentina, whether we had the subs there to do it or not. As you say, Maggie would have been in a straight jacket in no time. 70209[/snapback] I hope you aren't implying Rob was talking shite 70212[/snapback] Crikey Alex, I hope that it doesn't appear that I was! I don't ever intend to call anyone's posting as shite (unless in a joke) as I know that one or two *cough* of mine would be open to debate. No, that was not my intention. As I have a clear head from only consuming half a case of 'wfe-beater' last night, I thought I would enter into some intellectual debate (like wot they do on N-O) and pretend I knew what I was talking about! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Of course the N subs in the S Atlantic didn't carry Trident or even any A bombs........... We could have fired them from the N Atlantic but I'm pretty sure the Yanks have to agree (real cynics believe they have an electronic override on the missiles which are all supplied from the States anyway) Also the PM doesn't actually have total authority to launch - it has to go via the chain of command and I'm pretty sure she would have been in a straight jacket pretty quickly......... 69846[/snapback] The only subs we know that were in S.Atlantic at the time were 'hunter-killer's' which don't carry ICBM's. We will never find out where the Polaris subs (we didn't have Tridents) were at the time (unless an 'insider' tells us!) but they did indeed carry ICBM's. There is no way on earth that we would have nuked Argentina, whether we had the subs there to do it or not. As you say, Maggie would have been in a straight jacket in no time. 70209[/snapback] I hope you aren't implying Rob was talking shite 70212[/snapback] Crikey Alex, I hope that it doesn't appear that I was! I don't ever intend to call anyone's posting as shite (unless in a joke) as I know that one or two *cough* of mine would be open to debate. No, that was not my intention. As I have a clear head from only consuming half a case of 'wfe-beater' last night, I thought I would enter into some intellectual debate (like wot they do on N-O) and pretend I knew what I was talking about! 70214[/snapback] Good Canny interesting/weird though isn't it, the thought of these subs going about with nuclear missiles on board with only a hnadful of people knowing where they are/where they are going. I believe most of the crew don't even know where they are heading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 20953 Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Of course the N subs in the S Atlantic didn't carry Trident or even any A bombs........... We could have fired them from the N Atlantic but I'm pretty sure the Yanks have to agree (real cynics believe they have an electronic override on the missiles which are all supplied from the States anyway) Also the PM doesn't actually have total authority to launch - it has to go via the chain of command and I'm pretty sure she would have been in a straight jacket pretty quickly......... 69846[/snapback] The only subs we know that were in S.Atlantic at the time were 'hunter-killer's' which don't carry ICBM's. We will never find out where the Polaris subs (we didn't have Tridents) were at the time (unless an 'insider' tells us!) but they did indeed carry ICBM's. There is no way on earth that we would have nuked Argentina, whether we had the subs there to do it or not. As you say, Maggie would have been in a straight jacket in no time. 70209[/snapback] I hope you aren't implying Rob was talking shite 70212[/snapback] Crikey Alex, I hope that it doesn't appear that I was! I don't ever intend to call anyone's posting as shite (unless in a joke) as I know that one or two *cough* of mine would be open to debate. No, that was not my intention. As I have a clear head from only consuming half a case of 'wfe-beater' last night, I thought I would enter into some intellectual debate (like wot they do on N-O) and pretend I knew what I was talking about! 70214[/snapback] Now there's an idea for a thread, everybody has to talk like wot they do on N-O (I know I'm obssessed like). Anyway, nukes were use to destroy the Belgrano, but it's all been covered up like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Re: the Belgrano, I believe the headline on The S*n the following day was 'Gotcha!' ffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Of course the N subs in the S Atlantic didn't carry Trident or even any A bombs........... We could have fired them from the N Atlantic but I'm pretty sure the Yanks have to agree (real cynics believe they have an electronic override on the missiles which are all supplied from the States anyway) Also the PM doesn't actually have total authority to launch - it has to go via the chain of command and I'm pretty sure she would have been in a straight jacket pretty quickly......... 69846[/snapback] The only subs we know that were in S.Atlantic at the time were 'hunter-killer's' which don't carry ICBM's. We will never find out where the Polaris subs (we didn't have Tridents) were at the time (unless an 'insider' tells us!) but they did indeed carry ICBM's. There is no way on earth that we would have nuked Argentina, whether we had the subs there to do it or not. As you say, Maggie would have been in a straight jacket in no time. 70209[/snapback] I hope you aren't implying Rob was talking shite 70212[/snapback] Crikey Alex, I hope that it doesn't appear that I was! I don't ever intend to call anyone's posting as shite (unless in a joke) as I know that one or two *cough* of mine would be open to debate. No, that was not my intention. As I have a clear head from only consuming half a case of 'wfe-beater' last night, I thought I would enter into some intellectual debate (like wot they do on N-O) and pretend I knew what I was talking about! 70214[/snapback] Now there's an idea for a thread, everybody has to talk like wot they do on N-O (I know I'm obssessed like). Anyway, nukes were use to destroy the Belgrano, but it's all been covered up like. 70221[/snapback] Sorry, nukes did not sink the Belgrano. Ordinary torpedoes wot did it lyke, straight up (N-O speak). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyluke 2 Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 (edited) Re: the Belgrano, I believe the headline on The S*n the following day was 'Gotcha!' ffs. 70223[/snapback] It was torpedoed with Noel Edmonds. Sadly he survived. Edited December 21, 2005 by luckyluke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Re: the Belgrano, I believe the headline on The S*n the following day was 'Gotcha!' ffs. 70223[/snapback] It was torpedoed with Noel Edmonds. Sadly he survived. 70227[/snapback] That man has a lot of blood on his hands tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 the topic or my post Renton? 70040[/snapback] I was refferring to the article - it's blatent bullshit and I don't believe a word of it. 70213[/snapback] I thank you!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Of course the N subs in the S Atlantic didn't carry Trident or even any A bombs........... We could have fired them from the N Atlantic but I'm pretty sure the Yanks have to agree (real cynics believe they have an electronic override on the missiles which are all supplied from the States anyway) Also the PM doesn't actually have total authority to launch - it has to go via the chain of command and I'm pretty sure she would have been in a straight jacket pretty quickly......... 69846[/snapback] The only subs we know that were in S.Atlantic at the time were 'hunter-killer's' which don't carry ICBM's. We will never find out where the Polaris subs (we didn't have Tridents) were at the time (unless an 'insider' tells us!) but they did indeed carry ICBM's. There is no way on earth that we would have nuked Argentina, whether we had the subs there to do it or not. As you say, Maggie would have been in a straight jacket in no time. 70209[/snapback] I hope you aren't implying Rob was talking shite 70212[/snapback] he's agreeing with me FFS - I'm not sure if we'd replaced Polaris with Trident at that time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 Of course the N subs in the S Atlantic didn't carry Trident or even any A bombs........... We could have fired them from the N Atlantic but I'm pretty sure the Yanks have to agree (real cynics believe they have an electronic override on the missiles which are all supplied from the States anyway) Also the PM doesn't actually have total authority to launch - it has to go via the chain of command and I'm pretty sure she would have been in a straight jacket pretty quickly......... 69846[/snapback] The only subs we know that were in S.Atlantic at the time were 'hunter-killer's' which don't carry ICBM's. We will never find out where the Polaris subs (we didn't have Tridents) were at the time (unless an 'insider' tells us!) but they did indeed carry ICBM's. There is no way on earth that we would have nuked Argentina, whether we had the subs there to do it or not. As you say, Maggie would have been in a straight jacket in no time. 70209[/snapback] I hope you aren't implying Rob was talking shite 70212[/snapback] he's agreeing with me FFS - I'm not sure if we'd replaced Polaris with Trident at that time 70271[/snapback] Corrected you re Trident/Polaris tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now