Jump to content

Oslo bombed


Happy Face
 Share

Recommended Posts

Days after the Murdoch hearing in England, journalist called kids trying to flee and hide from the gunman on Utøya. I'm completely lost for words, on how a journalist can think it's okay to call up people, teenagers, for eyewitness accounts, while they are running for their lives.

 

The Sun stated on their front page yesterday that moslem terrorists were responsible. Not an uncommon comment from millions of people on Friday afternoon I'd guess, but for a national newspaper to print it as "fact" is grossly irresponsible iyam.

 

As did the nyt, the guardian and others. Based on the claims of a Twitter 'expert'.

 

The NYT even suggested it's only terrorism if Muslims did it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

General opinion in Norway is to have a behind doors trial so he wont get what he craves most of all, getting a hard on from all the attention.

 

So great, have him, his lawyer, and the judge. Should be all you need anyhow.

 

And even though the maximum amount of years is 21 in prison, you can get what we norwegians call "forvaring". No clue as to what the word would translate to but it basically means that the government reserves the right to keep him in lockup simply because they deem him a threat to society. So he wont ever get out of prison, I can atleast guarantee that much.

 

Isn't that like a 5 year rolling sentence? He serves his 21 years and if he's still deemed a threat they add 5 years on, then 5 years later they can add another 5 years on etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Days after the Murdoch hearing in England, journalist called kids trying to flee and hide from the gunman on Utøya. I'm completely lost for words, on how a journalist can think it's okay to call up people, teenagers, for eyewitness accounts, while they are running for their lives.

 

The Sun stated on their front page yesterday that moslem terrorists were responsible. Not an uncommon comment from millions of people on Friday afternoon I'd guess, but for a national newspaper to print it as "fact" is grossly irresponsible iyam.

 

As did the nyt, the guardian and others. Based on the claims of a Twitter 'expert'.

 

The NYT even suggested it's only terrorism if Muslims did it.

 

It was Cwarrr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

General opinion in Norway is to have a behind doors trial so he wont get what he craves most of all, getting a hard on from all the attention.

 

So great, have him, his lawyer, and the judge. Should be all you need anyhow.

 

And even though the maximum amount of years is 21 in prison, you can get what we norwegians call "forvaring". No clue as to what the word would translate to but it basically means that the government reserves the right to keep him in lockup simply because they deem him a threat to society. So he wont ever get out of prison, I can atleast guarantee that much.

 

Isn't that like a 5 year rolling sentence? He serves his 21 years and if he's still deemed a threat they add 5 years on, then 5 years later they can add another 5 years on etc.

 

Unsure how it actually works, it was just briefly explained by some lawyer on TV, but he also said that he will never leave prison for the rest of his life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even by the lofty standards of thread hijacks, this one is right up there on cloud fucking nine, really.

Ssh, someone's spaz-abuse gland is weeping like a teetotal cock monster in Vegas when their camera packs in.

^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry if this is repeating what others have said but I find it horrible that this bastard has now got his place in the limelight where he can 'justify' his actions and put the survivors and victims' friends and family through even more pain. I wish he'd been shot or had killed himself on that island.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thease foran pricks are taking british jobs for british workers

 

Er, alright Paul Wyn, settle down. I would suggest that there's plenty of jobs out there for people who want them, it just so happens a lot of Brits would rather claim welfare than work in a takeaway, as a taxi driver, in a care home etc. leaving a lot of those jobs to be taken by foreigners. Not to mention the fact a lot of these 'Asians' are actually 3rd and 4th generation British Asians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.