ChezGiven 0 Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 The case is now close to collapse http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/0...-new-york-times No matter, once DSK was removed, the more hardline John Lipsky was able to force the Germans to guarantee the $350bn debt owed by Greece to the global banking system. http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/ju...e-greek-bailout Obviously now Greece has forced through the austerity measures http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/ju...terity-measures .. the case against DSK is no longer neccessary to further the private interests of the banking lobby. Conspiracy anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 The case is now close to collapse http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/0...-new-york-times No matter, once DSK was removed, the more hardline John Lipsky was able to force the Germans to guarantee the $350bn debt owed by Greece to the global banking system. http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/ju...e-greek-bailout Obviously now Greece has forced through the austerity measures http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/ju...terity-measures .. the case against DSK is no longer neccessary to further the private interests of the banking lobby. Conspiracy anyone? I said as much in the SK thread a few weeks back. They cook up shit against anyone that gets in the way....SK also made the mistake of saying that American debt was unsustainable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted July 1, 2011 Author Share Posted July 1, 2011 It might just be a good defence from DSK, the full weight of the french leftist establishment is behind him but as soon as i saw Lipsky's intervention into the Greek/German negotiations, i knew that something dodgy was going on. If the case does collapse, then who will be held accountable for the fall out across Europe of further economic depression in the region? Not the IMF for one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin S. Assilleekunt 1 Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 I heard he was worried of a setup like this and had mentioned these fears in the past, not that there's anything wrong with that* *seinfeld Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giraffidae 0 Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 could be true. But when he was first arrested I thought he was bound to get off. Top lawyers –v– chambermaid with no witnesses or evidence other than her statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 could be true. But when he was first arrested I thought he was bound to get off. Top lawyers –v– chambermaid with no witnesses or evidence other than her statement. Aye in the absence of CCTV or a reliable independent witness it was the most likely outcome, conspiracy or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4389 Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 could be true. But when he was first arrested I thought he was bound to get off. Top lawyers –v– chambermaid with no witnesses or evidence other than her statement. Plus the usual lovely tactic of questioning her "credibility" as the report goes which I guess will either be based on her immigration status or sexual history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted July 1, 2011 Author Share Posted July 1, 2011 Proven associate of drug dealers and an unexplained $100k into her bank account over a period of one year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now