Barney 0 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Just undersoil heating, wasn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Just undersoil heating, wasn't it? That was mentioned as costing around £300k iirc when people were saying Blackpool should've been made to install it when they came up. It can only be easier / cheaper to install at a training facility rather than in a stadium you'd have thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus 0 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 didnt they also bore a hole to access groundwater ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney 0 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Actually, the pitch was re-done and the family enclosure is being painted too-so that's proabbly part of the £35m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2204 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 The thing is, it's not just about re-laying the pitch, you have to take into account the wages of the ground staff for the next 5 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 The thing is, it's not just about re-laying the pitch, you have to take into account the wages of the ground staff for the next 5 years Don't forget the paint for the walls. The custard creams for board meetings are a huge expense too. All staying IN THE CLUB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 see what happens when I'm away for a few days. This place goes mega quiet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2204 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 see what happens when I'm away for a few days. This place goes mega quiet We all agreed you were right all along while you were away. Shame you missed it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 13766 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 If the club come out and say they're spending the £35 million on new office furniture, I might go and shit in the box office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2204 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 If the club come out and say they're spending the £35 million on new office furniture, I might go and shit in the box office. Don't do it man! The cleaning bill will fuck next year's transfer budget! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 7068 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Those massive Sports Direct signs don't put themselves up their either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Those massive Sports Direct signs don't put themselves up their either. Aye, Monkey's Fist, you turncoat abseiling bastard! Or is that Ant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammynb 3343 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Those massive Sports Direct signs don't put themselves up their either. Oh, to know how much of that is going into the club??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4679 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Thing is, some papers are reporting DL said all the money would go back on players. Thats not what he said, just that none of the money would leave the club. Two very different statements. I agree we need to be careful at a time of fucking mental transfer fees that we dont pay over the odds. I'd also agree its better to shop around and get a good deal. Also agree it may be better to keep a little back in case we need a player in january. But come on, how thick do they take us for? they seem to constantly come out with stuff and think we wont remember. Im not counting pennies and expecting to see all of the £35M spent. But if it includes wages then surely we have to add wages back on when players leave? Does that not mean the wages for Ba et al are cancelled out by the wages from Sol, Nolan, Carroll etc? Fair enough its a few ££ on signing on fees etc, but not £20M worth or whatever. Disagree with them using the £35M to pay for the training round (no idea what that costs). Id still be happy (well, content) if we just signed a decent forward and kept Jose. Putting aside where the money comes from, the fact they have done what they have at the training ground imo is fantastic news and could well get us quite a few extra points next season. The pitches up there are now said to be like bowling greens and the under soil heating will allow training all year long. Could drastically reduce the niggles setting in due to training on crap surfaces or for the matter injuries whilst training. At the end of the day if they have had to steal a mill from the Carrol fee then it is money well spent imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10682 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 ... I just can't do it anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 13766 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Thing is, some papers are reporting DL said all the money would go back on players. Thats not what he said, just that none of the money would leave the club. Two very different statements. I agree we need to be careful at a time of fucking mental transfer fees that we dont pay over the odds. I'd also agree its better to shop around and get a good deal. Also agree it may be better to keep a little back in case we need a player in january. But come on, how thick do they take us for? they seem to constantly come out with stuff and think we wont remember. Im not counting pennies and expecting to see all of the £35M spent. But if it includes wages then surely we have to add wages back on when players leave? Does that not mean the wages for Ba et al are cancelled out by the wages from Sol, Nolan, Carroll etc? Fair enough its a few ££ on signing on fees etc, but not £20M worth or whatever. Disagree with them using the £35M to pay for the training round (no idea what that costs). Id still be happy (well, content) if we just signed a decent forward and kept Jose. Putting aside where the money comes from, the fact they have done what they have at the training ground imo is fantastic news and could well get us quite a few extra points next season. The pitches up there are now said to be like bowling greens and the under soil heating will allow training all year long. Could drastically reduce the niggles setting in due to training on crap surfaces or for the matter injuries whilst training. At the end of the day if they have had to steal a mill from the Carrol fee then it is money well spent imo. More than some new players? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4679 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Thing is, some papers are reporting DL said all the money would go back on players. Thats not what he said, just that none of the money would leave the club. Two very different statements. I agree we need to be careful at a time of fucking mental transfer fees that we dont pay over the odds. I'd also agree its better to shop around and get a good deal. Also agree it may be better to keep a little back in case we need a player in january. But come on, how thick do they take us for? they seem to constantly come out with stuff and think we wont remember. Im not counting pennies and expecting to see all of the £35M spent. But if it includes wages then surely we have to add wages back on when players leave? Does that not mean the wages for Ba et al are cancelled out by the wages from Sol, Nolan, Carroll etc? Fair enough its a few ££ on signing on fees etc, but not £20M worth or whatever. Disagree with them using the £35M to pay for the training round (no idea what that costs). Id still be happy (well, content) if we just signed a decent forward and kept Jose. Putting aside where the money comes from, the fact they have done what they have at the training ground imo is fantastic news and could well get us quite a few extra points next season. The pitches up there are now said to be like bowling greens and the under soil heating will allow training all year long. Could drastically reduce the niggles setting in due to training on crap surfaces or for the matter injuries whilst training. At the end of the day if they have had to steal a mill from the Carrol fee then it is money well spent imo. More than some new players? Pound for pound definitely. If Alex says its 300k... then what would you get for that.....a fourth choice squad kid at best. Now keeping Ben Arfa or Ba injury free... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 13766 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Thing is, some papers are reporting DL said all the money would go back on players. Thats not what he said, just that none of the money would leave the club. Two very different statements. I agree we need to be careful at a time of fucking mental transfer fees that we dont pay over the odds. I'd also agree its better to shop around and get a good deal. Also agree it may be better to keep a little back in case we need a player in january. But come on, how thick do they take us for? they seem to constantly come out with stuff and think we wont remember. Im not counting pennies and expecting to see all of the £35M spent. But if it includes wages then surely we have to add wages back on when players leave? Does that not mean the wages for Ba et al are cancelled out by the wages from Sol, Nolan, Carroll etc? Fair enough its a few ££ on signing on fees etc, but not £20M worth or whatever. Disagree with them using the £35M to pay for the training round (no idea what that costs). Id still be happy (well, content) if we just signed a decent forward and kept Jose. Putting aside where the money comes from, the fact they have done what they have at the training ground imo is fantastic news and could well get us quite a few extra points next season. The pitches up there are now said to be like bowling greens and the under soil heating will allow training all year long. Could drastically reduce the niggles setting in due to training on crap surfaces or for the matter injuries whilst training. At the end of the day if they have had to steal a mill from the Carrol fee then it is money well spent imo. More than some new players? Pound for pound definitely. If Alex says its 300k... then what would you get for that.....a fourth choice squad kid at best. Now keeping Ben Arfa or Ba injury free... Spending £10 million on a goalscorer gets you more points than a 300k training pitch. Does this really need to be argued? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10682 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 You honestly think they're going to actually spend £300k and spend the rest on players? Or do you think they're going to "allocate" millions towards ongoing improvement of the Training Ground and it's facilities? This is yet another line of bullshit from the club that you eagerly suck from the devils cock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4679 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Thing is, some papers are reporting DL said all the money would go back on players. Thats not what he said, just that none of the money would leave the club. Two very different statements. I agree we need to be careful at a time of fucking mental transfer fees that we dont pay over the odds. I'd also agree its better to shop around and get a good deal. Also agree it may be better to keep a little back in case we need a player in january. But come on, how thick do they take us for? they seem to constantly come out with stuff and think we wont remember. Im not counting pennies and expecting to see all of the £35M spent. But if it includes wages then surely we have to add wages back on when players leave? Does that not mean the wages for Ba et al are cancelled out by the wages from Sol, Nolan, Carroll etc? Fair enough its a few ££ on signing on fees etc, but not £20M worth or whatever. Disagree with them using the £35M to pay for the training round (no idea what that costs). Id still be happy (well, content) if we just signed a decent forward and kept Jose. Putting aside where the money comes from, the fact they have done what they have at the training ground imo is fantastic news and could well get us quite a few extra points next season. The pitches up there are now said to be like bowling greens and the under soil heating will allow training all year long. Could drastically reduce the niggles setting in due to training on crap surfaces or for the matter injuries whilst training. At the end of the day if they have had to steal a mill from the Carrol fee then it is money well spent imo. More than some new players? Pound for pound definitely. If Alex says its 300k... then what would you get for that.....a fourth choice squad kid at best. Now keeping Ben Arfa or Ba injury free... Spending £10 million on a goalscorer gets you more points than a 300k training pitch. Does this really need to be argued? I think the point escapes you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 32710 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Putting aside where the money comes from, the fact they have done what they have at the training ground imo is fantastic news and could well get us quite a few extra points next season. The pitches up there are now said to be like bowling greens and the under soil heating will allow training all year long. Could drastically reduce the niggles setting in due to training on crap surfaces or for the matter injuries whilst training. At the end of the day if they have had to steal a mill from the Carrol fee then it is money well spent imo. Just like 'Knackas' who started going to games with my crowd. Knew fuck all but would still opine his opinion to play 'devils advocate' just for some 'healthy debate' thinking he was bucking the trend and was ahead of the game. Thats how he got his name, shortened from, 'Who's that Bulls knacker? Is he with yous lot?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4679 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 You honestly think they're going to actually spend £300k and spend the rest on players? Or do you think they're going to "allocate" millions towards ongoing improvement of the Training Ground and it's facilities? This is yet another line of bullshit from the club that you eagerly suck from the devils cock My point was how the money spent at the training ground, regardless of which pot it was allocated from, is excellent news for the first team squad and will hopefully ensure the players train better and with less likelihood of injury at all times of the year. As I think you probably know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 13766 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Thing is, some papers are reporting DL said all the money would go back on players. Thats not what he said, just that none of the money would leave the club. Two very different statements. I agree we need to be careful at a time of fucking mental transfer fees that we dont pay over the odds. I'd also agree its better to shop around and get a good deal. Also agree it may be better to keep a little back in case we need a player in january. But come on, how thick do they take us for? they seem to constantly come out with stuff and think we wont remember. Im not counting pennies and expecting to see all of the £35M spent. But if it includes wages then surely we have to add wages back on when players leave? Does that not mean the wages for Ba et al are cancelled out by the wages from Sol, Nolan, Carroll etc? Fair enough its a few ££ on signing on fees etc, but not £20M worth or whatever. Disagree with them using the £35M to pay for the training round (no idea what that costs). Id still be happy (well, content) if we just signed a decent forward and kept Jose. Putting aside where the money comes from, the fact they have done what they have at the training ground imo is fantastic news and could well get us quite a few extra points next season. The pitches up there are now said to be like bowling greens and the under soil heating will allow training all year long. Could drastically reduce the niggles setting in due to training on crap surfaces or for the matter injuries whilst training. At the end of the day if they have had to steal a mill from the Carrol fee then it is money well spent imo. More than some new players? Pound for pound definitely. If Alex says its 300k... then what would you get for that.....a fourth choice squad kid at best. Now keeping Ben Arfa or Ba injury free... Spending £10 million on a goalscorer gets you more points than a 300k training pitch. Does this really need to be argued? I think the point escapes you. No, your point is that you genuinely think undersoil heating will get us more points than otherwise. I genuinely think that their notion of "spending some of the 35 million on the training ground" is absolute bullshit that only the most deluded man could believe = a wise spending at a club that desperately needs it spent on players. It won't get us any more points and believing it will shows a total fundamental lack of understanding about the game of football. Better players gets you points, not the same players playing on a slightly different pitch every morning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4679 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Putting aside where the money comes from, the fact they have done what they have at the training ground imo is fantastic news and could well get us quite a few extra points next season. The pitches up there are now said to be like bowling greens and the under soil heating will allow training all year long. Could drastically reduce the niggles setting in due to training on crap surfaces or for the matter injuries whilst training. At the end of the day if they have had to steal a mill from the Carrol fee then it is money well spent imo. Just like 'Knackas' who started going to games with my crowd. Knew fuck all but would still opine his opinion to play 'devils advocate' just for some 'healthy debate' thinking he was bucking the trend and was ahead of the game. Thats how he got his name, shortened from, 'Who's that Bulls knacker? Is he with yous lot?" Surprised at this from you Do you not see the benefit to the first team of the changes made at the training ground? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 32710 Posted July 7, 2011 Share Posted July 7, 2011 Putting aside where the money comes from, the fact they have done what they have at the training ground imo is fantastic news and could well get us quite a few extra points next season. The pitches up there are now said to be like bowling greens and the under soil heating will allow training all year long. Could drastically reduce the niggles setting in due to training on crap surfaces or for the matter injuries whilst training. At the end of the day if they have had to steal a mill from the Carrol fee then it is money well spent imo. Just like 'Knackas' who started going to games with my crowd. Knew fuck all but would still opine his opinion to play 'devils advocate' just for some 'healthy debate' thinking he was bucking the trend and was ahead of the game. Thats how he got his name, shortened from, 'Who's that Bulls knacker? Is he with yous lot?" Surprised at this from you Do you not see the benefit to the first team of the changes made at the training ground? That post, CT. If that wasn't you on the wind up then I really am A fucking Chinaman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now