AgentAxeman 182 Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 Gonna sleep with a hammer under me pillow and a baseball bat by the bed from now on..................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 So can you do what you like? The old woman example won't hold up in a court. At what popint will it become criminal force? When you slice the head off and start eating the brain with a spoon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 13894 Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 One step toward the world of Mad Max. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30682 Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 Leazes currently putting up posters around his local mosque inviting them all to his cops and robbers themed fancy dress party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted June 29, 2011 Share Posted June 29, 2011 Leazes currently putting up posters around his local mosque inviting them all to his cops and robbers themed fancy dress party. aye he speaks Muslim really well........................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 http://uk.news.yahoo.com/no-charges-burgla...-105908559.html "A householder who was arrested on suspicion of murdering a burglar is to be released without charge." Tbf, for all the skriking the red tops do about this kind of thing, we live in a sensible legal climate in this country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Leazes currently putting up posters around his local mosque inviting them all to his cops and robbers themed fancy dress party. aye he speaks Muslim really well........................... All the asylum seekers all congregating on the corner of your street while you brew them a cup of tea before inviting them in for a friendly chat first After all, they have broken no laws [apart from being here illegally, and sponging off our bottomless pit of state money] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4389 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 All the asylum seekers all congregating on the corner of your street while you brew them a cup of tea before inviting them in for a friendly chat first After all, they have broken no laws [apart from being here illegally, and sponging off our bottomless pit of state money] I know its pointless but asylum sseekers aren't here illegally and can't claim benefits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 All the asylum seekers all congregating on the corner of your street while you brew them a cup of tea before inviting them in for a friendly chat first After all, they have broken no laws [apart from being here illegally, and sponging off our bottomless pit of state money] I know its pointless but asylum sseekers aren't here illegally and can't claim benefits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgentAxeman 182 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 All the asylum seekers all congregating on the corner of your street while you brew them a cup of tea before inviting them in for a friendly chat first After all, they have broken no laws [apart from being here illegally, and sponging off our bottomless pit of state money] I know its pointless but asylum sseekers aren't here illegally and can't claim benefits. Wrong. Illegal immigration 13. There are three main sources of illegal immigration - those who clandestinely cross the borders e.g. on the back of a lorry, visitors and students who overstay their visas, and rejected asylum seekers who the authorities fail to remove. In the autumn of 2009 the press reported extensive exploitation of the student visa system, notably on the Indian sub-continent and, in February 2010, the government temporarily suspended applications from posts in China, India, Bangladesh and Nepal. MigrationWatch UK has estimated that there are around 32,000 bogus students coming to the UK every year, at a cost to the taxpayer of between £326 million and £493 million. (Briefing Paper 2.10). The weaknesses of the student visa system are described in Briefing Paper 2.3. 14. In June 2005, a government commissioned study gave a central estimate of the number of illegal immigrants of 430,000. Migration Watch updated this to 475,000. (Briefing Paper 11.6). In March 2009, a study by the London School of Economics suggested a central estimate of 618,000 of which 442,000 were thought to be in London. Migrationwatch updated the UK estimate to 1.1 million. (Briefing Paper 11.22). The government continue to be opposed to an amnesty - for good reasons. (Briefing Paper 11.7). Source: http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/ This proves the point that some asylum seekers are indeed here illegally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4389 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 All the asylum seekers all congregating on the corner of your street while you brew them a cup of tea before inviting them in for a friendly chat first After all, they have broken no laws [apart from being here illegally, and sponging off our bottomless pit of state money] I know its pointless but asylum sseekers aren't here illegally and can't claim benefits. Wrong. Illegal immigration 13. There are three main sources of illegal immigration - those who clandestinely cross the borders e.g. on the back of a lorry, visitors and students who overstay their visas, and rejected asylum seekers who the authorities fail to remove. In the autumn of 2009 the press reported extensive exploitation of the student visa system, notably on the Indian sub-continent and, in February 2010, the government temporarily suspended applications from posts in China, India, Bangladesh and Nepal. MigrationWatch UK has estimated that there are around 32,000 bogus students coming to the UK every year, at a cost to the taxpayer of between £326 million and £493 million. (Briefing Paper 2.10). The weaknesses of the student visa system are described in Briefing Paper 2.3. 14. In June 2005, a government commissioned study gave a central estimate of the number of illegal immigrants of 430,000. Migration Watch updated this to 475,000. (Briefing Paper 11.6). In March 2009, a study by the London School of Economics suggested a central estimate of 618,000 of which 442,000 were thought to be in London. Migrationwatch updated the UK estimate to 1.1 million. (Briefing Paper 11.22). The government continue to be opposed to an amnesty - for good reasons. (Briefing Paper 11.7). Source: http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/ This proves the point that some asylum seekers are indeed here illegally. Do you think LM recognises the difference between "rejected" and the rest? Also "migration watch" - biased? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 All the asylum seekers all congregating on the corner of your street while you brew them a cup of tea before inviting them in for a friendly chat first After all, they have broken no laws [apart from being here illegally, and sponging off our bottomless pit of state money] I know its pointless but asylum sseekers aren't here illegally and can't claim benefits. Wrong. Illegal immigration 13. There are three main sources of illegal immigration - those who clandestinely cross the borders e.g. on the back of a lorry, visitors and students who overstay their visas, and rejected asylum seekers who the authorities fail to remove. In the autumn of 2009 the press reported extensive exploitation of the student visa system, notably on the Indian sub-continent and, in February 2010, the government temporarily suspended applications from posts in China, India, Bangladesh and Nepal. MigrationWatch UK has estimated that there are around 32,000 bogus students coming to the UK every year, at a cost to the taxpayer of between £326 million and £493 million. (Briefing Paper 2.10). The weaknesses of the student visa system are described in Briefing Paper 2.3. 14. In June 2005, a government commissioned study gave a central estimate of the number of illegal immigrants of 430,000. Migration Watch updated this to 475,000. (Briefing Paper 11.6). In March 2009, a study by the London School of Economics suggested a central estimate of 618,000 of which 442,000 were thought to be in London. Migrationwatch updated the UK estimate to 1.1 million. (Briefing Paper 11.22). The government continue to be opposed to an amnesty - for good reasons. (Briefing Paper 11.7). Source: http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/ This proves the point that some asylum seekers are indeed here illegally. If they're actual asylum seekers, they're participating in a legal process which is set up for that very purpose. That's not to say they're all ultimately granted asylum, but how can you have a process which pre-judges the outcome correctly every time? It'd be nice, but then you could apply that to every form of litigation going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgentAxeman 182 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 All the asylum seekers all congregating on the corner of your street while you brew them a cup of tea before inviting them in for a friendly chat first After all, they have broken no laws [apart from being here illegally, and sponging off our bottomless pit of state money] I know its pointless but asylum sseekers aren't here illegally and can't claim benefits. Wrong. Illegal immigration 13. There are three main sources of illegal immigration - those who clandestinely cross the borders e.g. on the back of a lorry, visitors and students who overstay their visas, and rejected asylum seekers who the authorities fail to remove. In the autumn of 2009 the press reported extensive exploitation of the student visa system, notably on the Indian sub-continent and, in February 2010, the government temporarily suspended applications from posts in China, India, Bangladesh and Nepal. MigrationWatch UK has estimated that there are around 32,000 bogus students coming to the UK every year, at a cost to the taxpayer of between £326 million and £493 million. (Briefing Paper 2.10). The weaknesses of the student visa system are described in Briefing Paper 2.3. 14. In June 2005, a government commissioned study gave a central estimate of the number of illegal immigrants of 430,000. Migration Watch updated this to 475,000. (Briefing Paper 11.6). In March 2009, a study by the London School of Economics suggested a central estimate of 618,000 of which 442,000 were thought to be in London. Migrationwatch updated the UK estimate to 1.1 million. (Briefing Paper 11.22). The government continue to be opposed to an amnesty - for good reasons. (Briefing Paper 11.7). Source: http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/ This proves the point that some asylum seekers are indeed here illegally. Do you think LM recognises the difference between "rejected" and the rest? Also "migration watch" - biased? only as biased as it's made out to be by those who purchase the Guardian. In other words bias is simply a point of view. if its not your pov then its biased. if it is your pov then its a sensible, rational argument! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7034 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 Maybe it's I work in the NHS with lots of educated and hard working foreigners, but I don't think I've ever met one of these illegal, benefit claiming, puppy drowning foreigners? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 All the asylum seekers all congregating on the corner of your street while you brew them a cup of tea before inviting them in for a friendly chat first After all, they have broken no laws [apart from being here illegally, and sponging off our bottomless pit of state money] I know its pointless but asylum sseekers aren't here illegally and can't claim benefits. Wrong. Illegal immigration 13. There are three main sources of illegal immigration - those who clandestinely cross the borders e.g. on the back of a lorry, visitors and students who overstay their visas, and rejected asylum seekers who the authorities fail to remove. In the autumn of 2009 the press reported extensive exploitation of the student visa system, notably on the Indian sub-continent and, in February 2010, the government temporarily suspended applications from posts in China, India, Bangladesh and Nepal. MigrationWatch UK has estimated that there are around 32,000 bogus students coming to the UK every year, at a cost to the taxpayer of between £326 million and £493 million. (Briefing Paper 2.10). The weaknesses of the student visa system are described in Briefing Paper 2.3. 14. In June 2005, a government commissioned study gave a central estimate of the number of illegal immigrants of 430,000. Migration Watch updated this to 475,000. (Briefing Paper 11.6). In March 2009, a study by the London School of Economics suggested a central estimate of 618,000 of which 442,000 were thought to be in London. Migrationwatch updated the UK estimate to 1.1 million. (Briefing Paper 11.22). The government continue to be opposed to an amnesty - for good reasons. (Briefing Paper 11.7). Source: http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/ This proves the point that some asylum seekers are indeed here illegally. Do you think LM recognises the difference between "rejected" and the rest? Also "migration watch" - biased? I don't think you understand anything about anything, you still live in your own little leftie do-gooder world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 All the asylum seekers all congregating on the corner of your street while you brew them a cup of tea before inviting them in for a friendly chat first After all, they have broken no laws [apart from being here illegally, and sponging off our bottomless pit of state money] I know its pointless but asylum sseekers aren't here illegally and can't claim benefits. Wrong. Illegal immigration 13. There are three main sources of illegal immigration - those who clandestinely cross the borders e.g. on the back of a lorry, visitors and students who overstay their visas, and rejected asylum seekers who the authorities fail to remove. In the autumn of 2009 the press reported extensive exploitation of the student visa system, notably on the Indian sub-continent and, in February 2010, the government temporarily suspended applications from posts in China, India, Bangladesh and Nepal. MigrationWatch UK has estimated that there are around 32,000 bogus students coming to the UK every year, at a cost to the taxpayer of between £326 million and £493 million. (Briefing Paper 2.10). The weaknesses of the student visa system are described in Briefing Paper 2.3. 14. In June 2005, a government commissioned study gave a central estimate of the number of illegal immigrants of 430,000. Migration Watch updated this to 475,000. (Briefing Paper 11.6). In March 2009, a study by the London School of Economics suggested a central estimate of 618,000 of which 442,000 were thought to be in London. Migrationwatch updated the UK estimate to 1.1 million. (Briefing Paper 11.22). The government continue to be opposed to an amnesty - for good reasons. (Briefing Paper 11.7). Source: http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/ This proves the point that some asylum seekers are indeed here illegally. Do you think LM recognises the difference between "rejected" and the rest? Also "migration watch" - biased? I don't think you understand anything about anything, you still live in your own little leftie do-gooder world. If they're rejected asylum status and not pursuing an appeal (ie just disappeared), they're no longer asylum seekers by definition. Surely you can get your head around that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 All the asylum seekers all congregating on the corner of your street while you brew them a cup of tea before inviting them in for a friendly chat first After all, they have broken no laws [apart from being here illegally, and sponging off our bottomless pit of state money] I know its pointless but asylum sseekers aren't here illegally and can't claim benefits. Wrong. Illegal immigration 13. There are three main sources of illegal immigration - those who clandestinely cross the borders e.g. on the back of a lorry, visitors and students who overstay their visas, and rejected asylum seekers who the authorities fail to remove. In the autumn of 2009 the press reported extensive exploitation of the student visa system, notably on the Indian sub-continent and, in February 2010, the government temporarily suspended applications from posts in China, India, Bangladesh and Nepal. MigrationWatch UK has estimated that there are around 32,000 bogus students coming to the UK every year, at a cost to the taxpayer of between £326 million and £493 million. (Briefing Paper 2.10). The weaknesses of the student visa system are described in Briefing Paper 2.3. 14. In June 2005, a government commissioned study gave a central estimate of the number of illegal immigrants of 430,000. Migration Watch updated this to 475,000. (Briefing Paper 11.6). In March 2009, a study by the London School of Economics suggested a central estimate of 618,000 of which 442,000 were thought to be in London. Migrationwatch updated the UK estimate to 1.1 million. (Briefing Paper 11.22). The government continue to be opposed to an amnesty - for good reasons. (Briefing Paper 11.7). Source: http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/ This proves the point that some asylum seekers are indeed here illegally. If they're actual asylum seekers, they're participating in a legal process which is set up for that very purpose. That's not to say they're all ultimately granted asylum, but how can you have a process which pre-judges the outcome correctly every time? It'd be nice, but then you could apply that to every form of litigation going. I'm sure the country is doing just fine, we don't have an immigration problem, our social services aren't at all over-stretched, these cuts imposed by the govt are a figment of the imagination, and all immigrants [illegal or not] are coming to the UK to earn a living, learn English and contribute to the economy etc, just like you said. As you are solicitor, you undoubtedly know more than anybody about anything of course. What a knobheed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 All the asylum seekers all congregating on the corner of your street while you brew them a cup of tea before inviting them in for a friendly chat first After all, they have broken no laws [apart from being here illegally, and sponging off our bottomless pit of state money] I know its pointless but asylum sseekers aren't here illegally and can't claim benefits. Wrong. Illegal immigration 13. There are three main sources of illegal immigration - those who clandestinely cross the borders e.g. on the back of a lorry, visitors and students who overstay their visas, and rejected asylum seekers who the authorities fail to remove. In the autumn of 2009 the press reported extensive exploitation of the student visa system, notably on the Indian sub-continent and, in February 2010, the government temporarily suspended applications from posts in China, India, Bangladesh and Nepal. MigrationWatch UK has estimated that there are around 32,000 bogus students coming to the UK every year, at a cost to the taxpayer of between £326 million and £493 million. (Briefing Paper 2.10). The weaknesses of the student visa system are described in Briefing Paper 2.3. 14. In June 2005, a government commissioned study gave a central estimate of the number of illegal immigrants of 430,000. Migration Watch updated this to 475,000. (Briefing Paper 11.6). In March 2009, a study by the London School of Economics suggested a central estimate of 618,000 of which 442,000 were thought to be in London. Migrationwatch updated the UK estimate to 1.1 million. (Briefing Paper 11.22). The government continue to be opposed to an amnesty - for good reasons. (Briefing Paper 11.7). Source: http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/ This proves the point that some asylum seekers are indeed here illegally. Do you think LM recognises the difference between "rejected" and the rest? Also "migration watch" - biased? I don't think you understand anything about anything, you still live in your own little leftie do-gooder world. If they're rejected asylum status and not pursuing an appeal (ie just disappeared), they're no longer asylum seekers by definition. Surely you can get your head around that? Despite your unnecessary pedantic stance, surely a clever lad like you can see we have a huge problem which is costing the country and social services millions/billions of pounds which cannot be sustained. Why don't you debate NUFC issues with me anymore ? Is it because you know I ripped you up for arsepaper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 All the asylum seekers all congregating on the corner of your street while you brew them a cup of tea before inviting them in for a friendly chat first After all, they have broken no laws [apart from being here illegally, and sponging off our bottomless pit of state money] I know its pointless but asylum sseekers aren't here illegally and can't claim benefits. Wrong. Illegal immigration 13. There are three main sources of illegal immigration - those who clandestinely cross the borders e.g. on the back of a lorry, visitors and students who overstay their visas, and rejected asylum seekers who the authorities fail to remove. In the autumn of 2009 the press reported extensive exploitation of the student visa system, notably on the Indian sub-continent and, in February 2010, the government temporarily suspended applications from posts in China, India, Bangladesh and Nepal. MigrationWatch UK has estimated that there are around 32,000 bogus students coming to the UK every year, at a cost to the taxpayer of between £326 million and £493 million. (Briefing Paper 2.10). The weaknesses of the student visa system are described in Briefing Paper 2.3. 14. In June 2005, a government commissioned study gave a central estimate of the number of illegal immigrants of 430,000. Migration Watch updated this to 475,000. (Briefing Paper 11.6). In March 2009, a study by the London School of Economics suggested a central estimate of 618,000 of which 442,000 were thought to be in London. Migrationwatch updated the UK estimate to 1.1 million. (Briefing Paper 11.22). The government continue to be opposed to an amnesty - for good reasons. (Briefing Paper 11.7). Source: http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/ This proves the point that some asylum seekers are indeed here illegally. If they're actual asylum seekers, they're participating in a legal process which is set up for that very purpose. That's not to say they're all ultimately granted asylum, but how can you have a process which pre-judges the outcome correctly every time? It'd be nice, but then you could apply that to every form of litigation going. I'm sure the country is doing just fine, we don't have an immigration problem, our social services aren't at all over-stretched, these cuts imposed by the govt are a figment of the imagination, and all immigrants [illegal or not] are coming to the UK to earn a living, learn English and contribute to the economy etc, just like you said. As you are solicitor, you undoubtedly know more than anybody about anything of course. What a knobheed. Is this the bit where your argument fails so you start making up other peoples opinions for them? Hurray, got there sooner than usual. We can close the thread now then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 All the asylum seekers all congregating on the corner of your street while you brew them a cup of tea before inviting them in for a friendly chat first After all, they have broken no laws [apart from being here illegally, and sponging off our bottomless pit of state money] I know its pointless but asylum sseekers aren't here illegally and can't claim benefits. Wrong. Illegal immigration 13. There are three main sources of illegal immigration - those who clandestinely cross the borders e.g. on the back of a lorry, visitors and students who overstay their visas, and rejected asylum seekers who the authorities fail to remove. In the autumn of 2009 the press reported extensive exploitation of the student visa system, notably on the Indian sub-continent and, in February 2010, the government temporarily suspended applications from posts in China, India, Bangladesh and Nepal. MigrationWatch UK has estimated that there are around 32,000 bogus students coming to the UK every year, at a cost to the taxpayer of between £326 million and £493 million. (Briefing Paper 2.10). The weaknesses of the student visa system are described in Briefing Paper 2.3. 14. In June 2005, a government commissioned study gave a central estimate of the number of illegal immigrants of 430,000. Migration Watch updated this to 475,000. (Briefing Paper 11.6). In March 2009, a study by the London School of Economics suggested a central estimate of 618,000 of which 442,000 were thought to be in London. Migrationwatch updated the UK estimate to 1.1 million. (Briefing Paper 11.22). The government continue to be opposed to an amnesty - for good reasons. (Briefing Paper 11.7). Source: http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/ This proves the point that some asylum seekers are indeed here illegally. Do you think LM recognises the difference between "rejected" and the rest? Also "migration watch" - biased? I don't think you understand anything about anything, you still live in your own little leftie do-gooder world. If they're rejected asylum status and not pursuing an appeal (ie just disappeared), they're no longer asylum seekers by definition. Surely you can get your head around that? Despite your unnecessary pedantic stance, surely a clever lad like you can see we have a huge problem which is costing the country and social services millions/billions of pounds which cannot be sustained. Why don't you debate NUFC issues with me anymore ? Is it because you know I ripped you up for arsepaper Seriously, just stick to the curry recipes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now