Sven great again? Back for England?

[Christmas Tree 4827]

Maybe you're making it up as you go along.

 

Boring.

 

Can't you get an account on N-O or just melt?

 

Oh dear, still sulking.

 

Here's a forum you might be more suited too.

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cbeebies/

[Tom 14013]

Speaking of which haven't you got a Jeremy Kylesque amount of kids to attend to?

 

Get back to the housework.

[Christmas Tree 4827]

Speaking of which haven't you got a Jeremy Kylesque amount of kids to attend to?

 

 

Just on here Thomas, just on here.

[Irrelevant Nick KP 0]

James, Neville, Cole, Terry, Rio, Beckham, Lampard, Gerrard, Joe Cole, Rooney, Owen..

James #: Good, but not exceptional and prone to howlers.

Neville: Excellent, but not world class.

Ashley Cole. Not quite excellent. Carvalho better.

Terry. Over-rated.

Rio. Over-rated

Beckham. Non-match-fit in 2002, that was obvious. And in 2006 people were bashing Sven for picking him. Der!

Lampard. Has never been as good for England as he has for Chelsea

Gerrard. Did well when Sven used him as a forward, depiste the player protesting.

Joe Cole. World-class, and a gem of a player at that time.

Rooney. He can be discounted, sinced Sven never got knocked out with him on the pitch

Owen. Went off the boil in 2002-2004 and never regained his old athleticism.

Edited June 6, 2011 by Nick-Kielce-Poland

[Howmanheyman 33846]

Nick, are you Sven's agent?

 

I just can't imagine anyone starting a thread about the England team, (tempted to finish the sentence there, like), and bringing up the idea of Sven Goran Errikson coming back.

[Guest alex]

James, Neville, Cole, Terry, Rio, Beckham, Lampard, Gerrard, Joe Cole, Rooney, Owen..

James #: Good, but not exceptional and prone to howlers.

Neville: Excellent, but not world class.

Ashley Cole. Not quite excellent. Carvalho better.

Terry. Over-rated.

Rio. Over-rated

Beckham. Non-match-fit in 2002, that was obvious. And in 2006 people were bashing Sven for picking him. Der!

Lampard. Has never been as good for England as he has for Chelsea

Gerrard. Did well when Sven used him as a forward, depiste the player protesting.

Joe Cole. World-class, and a gem of a player at that time.

Rooney. He can be discounted, sinced Sven never got knocked out with him on the pitch

Owen. Went off the boil in 2002-2004 and never regained his old athleticism.

Carvalho's a centre-back tbh.

[Dr Gloom 22151]

Nick, are you Sven's agent?

 

I just can't imagine anyone starting a thread about the England team, (tempted to finish the sentence there, like), and bringing up the idea of Sven Goran Errikson coming back.

 

he's either blatantly on the wind up or just really dim

[Irrelevant Nick KP 0]

he's either blatantly on the wind up or just really dim

Do you like Sugar Puffs? :lol:

[LoveTheBobby 1]

"Nick, are you Sven's agent?"

 

He might be Tight Grip though ?

[Howmanheyman 33846]

Nick, are you Sven's agent?

 

I just can't imagine anyone starting a thread about the England team, (tempted to finish the sentence there, like), and bringing up the idea of Sven Goran Errikson coming back.

 

he's either blatantly on the wind up or just really dim

An attention seeker or a thick cunt?

 

He's doing himself no favours, either way.

[Phil 6]

Sven got Paul Scholes to retire early, him and Brian Barwick need shooting.

Edited June 6, 2011 by Phil

[Irrelevant Nick KP 0]

I don't know if I'm doing myself any favours.

What I do know, is that I consider most of the first 6-7 responses to this thread to be totally moronic. I think anyone who can be provoked by the initial posting must be a bit dim.

 

Paul Scholes chose to retire early.

Edited June 6, 2011 by Nick-Kielce-Poland

[Dr Gloom 22151]

I don't know if I'm doing myself any favours.

What I do know, is that I consider most of the first 6-7 responses to this thread to be totally moronic. I think anyone who can be provoked by the initial posting must be a bit dim.

 

yes, it's the posts following yours that are moronic

[Irrelevant Nick KP 0]

I don't know if I'm doing myself any favours.

What I do know, is that I consider most of the first 6-7 responses to this thread to be totally moronic. I think anyone who can be provoked by the initial posting must be a bit dim.

 

yes, it's the posts following yours that are moronic

I think so, yes.

[Dr Gloom 22151]

Sven got Paul Scholes to retire early, him and Brian Barwick need shooting.

 

that was a shocker. possession of the ball is so key in international football and he basically sidelined and ultimately forced out england's only central midfielder that knew the value of ball retention. gerrard, lampard and beckham all play way too many hollywood balls that don't come off. scholes knows you keep moves ticking along by keeping the ball.

 

for what it's worth nick, i think sven did ok as england manager but no better than that. he did the very minimum that was expected of an england manager with tht set of players but was never able to take the team to the final stages of a tournament. quarter finals are ok, but not that much to write home about. i doubt he would inspire the current lot to do any better plus the nation and the media have had enough of him. to suggest he comes back is just daft.

[Happy Face 29]

Only one man for the job now and thats Arry.

 

I dont like the bloke

 

I've split your post apart for you so you can use quote either, depending on how he gets on.

 

[Tom 14013]

What I do know, is that I consider most of the first 6-7 responses to this thread to be totally moronic

 

I thought mine was really good.

[Howmanheyman 33846]

I don't know if I'm doing myself any favours.

What I do know, is that I consider most of the first 6-7 responses to this thread to be totally moronic. I think anyone who can be provoked by the initial posting must be a bit dim.

 

Paul Scholes chose to retire early.

You've had a few waxers as topics, Nick. You have to give people the benefit of the doubt, but in your case, it wore out. LM reckons you're the only person he's put on ignore. Now LM likes an argument, but even he can't be arsed.

[Irrelevant Nick KP 0]

I don't know if I'm doing myself any favours.

What I do know, is that I consider most of the first 6-7 responses to this thread to be totally moronic. I think anyone who can be provoked by the initial posting must be a bit dim.

 

Paul Scholes chose to retire early.

You've had a few waxers as topics, Nick. You have to give people the benefit of the doubt, but in your case, it wore out. LM reckons you're the only person he's put on ignore. Now LM likes an argument, but even he can't be arsed.

The feeling is mutual with LM, and as I have said, I find most of the first responses to this topic, utterly moronic.

[Guest alex]

Scholes was messed about and played out of position to appease players with big egos like Lampard and Gerrard. I think that's why he couldn't be arsed in the end.

[Christmas Tree 4827]

Only one man for the job now and thats Arry.

 

I dont like the bloke

 

I've split your post apart for you so I can mis-quote either, depending on how he gets on.

 

 

Fixed it for ya.

[Happy Face 29]

I don't know if I'm doing myself any favours.

What I do know, is that I consider most of the first 6-7 responses to this thread to be totally moronic. I think anyone who can be provoked by the initial posting must be a bit dim.

 

Paul Scholes chose to retire early.

You've had a few waxers as topics, Nick. You have to give people the benefit of the doubt, but in your case, it wore out. LM reckons you're the only person he's put on ignore. Now LM likes an argument, but even he can't be arsed.

The feeling is mutual with LM, and as I have said, I find most of the first responses to this topic, utterly moronic.

 

I found out the other day that idiots are more stupid than moron's

 

IQ Range Classification

50-69 Moron

20-49 Imbecile

below 20 Idiot

 

We should all do IQ tests.

[Howmanheyman 33846]

I don't know if I'm doing myself any favours.

What I do know, is that I consider most of the first 6-7 responses to this thread to be totally moronic. I think anyone who can be provoked by the initial posting must be a bit dim.

 

Paul Scholes chose to retire early.

You've had a few waxers as topics, Nick. You have to give people the benefit of the doubt, but in your case, it wore out. LM reckons you're the only person he's put on ignore. Now LM likes an argument, but even he can't be arsed.

The feeling is mutual with LM, and as I have said, I find most of the first responses to this topic, utterly moronic.

Maybe the topic gets the responses it deserves?

[Irrelevant Nick KP 0]

Howmanheyman you may think it does, but clearly I don't agree, since, as I've said, I find those responses which I mentioned, totally moronic.

Edited June 6, 2011 by Nick-Kielce-Poland

[Guest alex]

Do, you, really, Nick?