Happy Face 29 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Released on monday apparently. Apples answer to the Google and amazon services that didn't quite work. access your itunes library from anywhere without spending months uploading it all to the cloud. It just checks you have the tag in your itunes, then streams the music from It's own server. Allows record companies to turn a profit from ripped music so might stand a chance. Looking forward to having a go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveTheBobby 1 Posted June 5, 2011 Share Posted June 5, 2011 i dont really get why folk choose to restrict/tie themselves in with Apple products and services tbh ? previously had a Macbook years ago and an ipod more recently but wouldnt buy any more of their gear again personally . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted June 5, 2011 Author Share Posted June 5, 2011 i dont really get why folk choose to restrict/tie themselves in with Apple products and services tbh ? previously had a Macbook years ago and an ipod more recently but wouldnt buy any more of their gear again personally . I don't think there's a cloud service worth paying for at the moment. This might be it. I know what you're getting at I think, a lot of people won't look past an ipod, an iphone, a Mac, an ipad etc. But I have an ipod and I use Itunes, while happily using a PC and an HTC phone which I prefer to the iphone. Horses for courses. I wouldn't rule out using apple products/services in future though. Doing that seems a more image conscious decision than sticking with Apple for everything IYAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveTheBobby 1 Posted June 5, 2011 Share Posted June 5, 2011 know what you mean, and i know youre very tech savvy and giving a balanced view. just my experiences of their stuff (while performance and build etc were good) it was the increasingly pervaisive way they have y by the mcfauls in that have to use their software, and the limitations thereof ? great marketing and business sense obviously, but i think people can choose them as a 'brand for life' sometimes and can miss out on the freedoms of rivals ? From a design pov Apple are fantastic, bordering on design fetish actually, but when y've got things like Stephen Fry posting vids of himself unpackaging his 'i was first in the queue for it' iPad or whatever it shows what a good job theyre doing marketing-wise and how bought in consumers can be to a brand . n that . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin 1 Posted June 5, 2011 Share Posted June 5, 2011 It doesn't hurt to add another two letters to "y". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveTheBobby 1 Posted June 5, 2011 Share Posted June 5, 2011 not a huge hurdle t overcome just put it down to phonetics Geordie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monroe Transfer 0 Posted June 5, 2011 Share Posted June 5, 2011 I know what you're getting at I think, a lot of people won't look past an ipod, an iphone, a Mac, an ipad etc. But I have an ipod and I use Itunes, while happily using a PC and an HTC phone which I prefer to the iphone. Horses for courses. Then there's the weird people like myself who can't bring themselves to ever get an Apple product, regardless of how good they are. I'm aware how irrational and stupid my dislike of Apple is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted June 6, 2011 Author Share Posted June 6, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted June 6, 2011 Author Share Posted June 6, 2011 http://www.apple.com/icloud/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted June 6, 2011 Author Share Posted June 6, 2011 Steve Jobs launched a slew of new services on Monday evening, including an online music offering that promises to let people listen to songs bought online on any Apple device with an internet connection. The iCloud service will be free to use and be available in the autumn. For an extra $25 a year, users can use the service to access any songs on their computer. "Some people think the cloud is just a big disk in the sky," said Jobs. "We think it's way more than that." Jobs said the service would be increasingly important "for those people who want to be completely PC-free", suggesting that in future people will want to operate using solely their phones and tablets and bypassing computers altogether. "The idea of the PC as the digital hub has broken down in the past few years," he said. Jobs, who has remained chief executive of Apple despite being on medical leave for the past six months, looked gaunt as he appeared in front of a crowd of more than 5,200 developers and media at the Moscone Center in San Francisco. After receiving a standing ovation at the opening, he gave a few brief words of welcome before quickly handing over to Phil Schiller, head of product marketing. Jobs returned almost 90 minutes later to introduce iCloud. The company also showed off new software for the iPhone intended to make it more competitive with Google's Android phone software, which has roared past Apple's iPhone to take a 36% share of the smartphone market. The iOS 5 software, which will run on iPhones introduced since June 2009, mimics a number of features available on the Google software. But Apple also indicated that it is seeking to undermine BlackBerry maker RIM's position in the market, by offering iMessage, which allows people to send messages directly to other iPhones or iPads – very like the BlackBerry Messenger feature which has proved hugely popular with teenagers and users in Middle Eastern countries. RIM's stock has fallen by 40% in the past three months as investors worry that its growth has stalled compared with Apple and Android phones. Apple's iCloud may have required an enormous investment. It is understood to have built a data centre in North Carolina with an estimated cost of $1bn and measures half a million square feet. In 2004 Jobs was treated for neuroendocrine cancer of the pancreas and in 2009 had a liver transplant. Doctors have questioned whether the 56-year old could be suffering the effects of immunosuppressive drugs needed for the transplant. Apple's launch of iCloud contrasts with similar offerings from Amazon and Google, which launched theirs in March and May. Amazon's "music locker" immediately ran into criticism from the record industry after its launch because it did not seek their permission to let users listen to music stored in their online lockers – a system that some labels argued required a per-play payment. Google managed to sign a number of the record labels, but not enough to cover everyone, and so its content is limited. Apple's only covers songs bought from its iTunes Music Store, and not any of the user's own content. For users, however, the lockers are cumbersome because they have to upload any tracks they want to listen to, which would be a slow process even for the few hundred tracks that people typically own. Apple also sought to emphasise its strength in contrast to rivals, especially companies making tablets to compete with its iPad. Scott Forstall, head of the iPhone software team, said a total of 25m iPads have been sold – implying that 5.5m iPad 2s have been sold in the past two months. At that rate, Apple could surpass its Christmas sale of 7.3m for the spring quarter, even while dozens of rivals struggle to sell more than half a million. Forstall said that more than 15bn songs have been bought from the iTunes Store, 14bn apps have been downloaded for the iPhone, iPod and iPad, there have been 130m downloads from the iBooks store, and that developers have received $2.5bn on sales of apps. ian.co.uk/technology/2011/jun/06/apple-pins-hopes-on-icloud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted November 22, 2011 Author Share Posted November 22, 2011 (edited) Itunes Match now available in the US...not expected here until 2012. £15 a year limited to 25,000 tracks apparently. All played as 256k AAC...even if you have a shitty sounding 128k mp3 in your library. Unfortunately can't be used on any non-apple mobile device. Twaarts! Edited November 22, 2011 by Happy Face Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now