Tooj 17 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 Show of intent if there's truth in it. Rewarding our best players with improved contracts. It's the right thing to do a long as its not a tactic aimed to hike up a transfer fee in the summer ala Carroll. Was Carroll's new contract aimed at hiking up the transfer fee? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 Show of intent if there's truth in it. Rewarding our best players with improved contracts. It's the right thing to do a long as its not a tactic aimed to hike up a transfer fee in the summer ala Carroll. so a club like NUFC - with the 14th biggest revenues in football - have to sell their best players to fulfill what should be operating costs of the level such a club ought to be able to compete at ? How much revenues does a club need exactly to not have to do this? As I've said for years - for which certain people have said is rubbish, this is one of the areas where the distinct lack of ambition is as obvious as the nose on your face, it is such obvious bollocks it's staggering people don't get it. Even the likes of Toonspac are still insisting we are doing "things like Spurs", well Spurs haven't done anything like this in the past 5 years, to quote their own example. What a load of utter shite this club is becoming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30368 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 So Colo on £77k a week and Krul on £58k. Doesn't seem to fit into our alleged "wage structure" £58k pw for Krul seems a bit on the high side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30368 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 Show of intent if there's truth in it. Rewarding our best players with improved contracts. It's the right thing to do a long as its not a tactic aimed to hike up a transfer fee in the summer ala Carroll. so a club like NUFC - with the 14th biggest revenues in football - have to sell their best players to fulfill what should be operating costs of the level such a club ought to be able to compete at ? How much revenues does a club need exactly to not have to do this? As I've said for years - for which certain people have said is rubbish, this is one of the areas where the distinct lack of ambition is as obvious as the nose on your face, it is such obvious bollocks it's staggering people don't get it. Even the likes of Toonspac are still insisting we are doing "things like Spurs", well Spurs haven't done anything like this in the past 5 years, to quote their own example. What a load of utter shite this club is becoming. So rewarding two of our best players with massive long term contracts shows that we've no ambition? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JawD 99 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 Show of intent if there's truth in it. Rewarding our best players with improved contracts. It's the right thing to do a long as its not a tactic aimed to hike up a transfer fee in the summer ala Carroll. so a club like NUFC - with the 14th biggest revenues in football - have to sell their best players to fulfill what should be operating costs of the level such a club ought to be able to compete at ? How much revenues does a club need exactly to not have to do this? As I've said for years - for which certain people have said is rubbish, this is one of the areas where the distinct lack of ambition is as obvious as the nose on your face, it is such obvious bollocks it's staggering people don't get it. Even the likes of Toonspac are still insisting we are doing "things like Spurs", well Spurs haven't done anything like this in the past 5 years, to quote their own example. What a load of utter shite this club is becoming. LM, lets face it, MA could pave your drive in Gold and you would complain thats it's too slippy. Clearly fuck all the club can do that you will see as a positive. You must really hate football these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 Show of intent if there's truth in it. Rewarding our best players with improved contracts. It's the right thing to do a long as its not a tactic aimed to hike up a transfer fee in the summer ala Carroll. so a club like NUFC - with the 14th biggest revenues in football - have to sell their best players to fulfill what should be operating costs of the level such a club ought to be able to compete at ? How much revenues does a club need exactly to not have to do this? As I've said for years - for which certain people have said is rubbish, this is one of the areas where the distinct lack of ambition is as obvious as the nose on your face, it is such obvious bollocks it's staggering people don't get it. Even the likes of Toonspac are still insisting we are doing "things like Spurs", well Spurs haven't done anything like this in the past 5 years, to quote their own example. What a load of utter shite this club is becoming. So rewarding two of our best players with massive long term contracts shows that we've no ambition? read the post properly, and expand your brain for a change. I'm not explaining this again, I've done it for a long time now and it ought to be obvious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted March 5, 2012 Author Share Posted March 5, 2012 So Colo on £77k a week and Krul on £58k. Doesn't seem to fit into our alleged "wage structure" £58k pw for Krul seems a bit on the high side. We won't be paying it long Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 Show of intent if there's truth in it. Rewarding our best players with improved contracts. It's the right thing to do a long as its not a tactic aimed to hike up a transfer fee in the summer ala Carroll. so a club like NUFC - with the 14th biggest revenues in football - have to sell their best players to fulfill what should be operating costs of the level such a club ought to be able to compete at ? How much revenues does a club need exactly to not have to do this? As I've said for years - for which certain people have said is rubbish, this is one of the areas where the distinct lack of ambition is as obvious as the nose on your face, it is such obvious bollocks it's staggering people don't get it. Even the likes of Toonspac are still insisting we are doing "things like Spurs", well Spurs haven't done anything like this in the past 5 years, to quote their own example. What a load of utter shite this club is becoming. LM, lets face it, MA could pave your drive in Gold and you would complain thats it's too slippy. Clearly fuck all the club can do that you will see as a positive. You must really hate football these days. sorry, but it only re-inforces what I've said for years and It's absolutely amazing that people are falling for this crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 So Colo on £77k a week and Krul on £58k. Doesn't seem to fit into our alleged "wage structure" £58k pw for Krul seems a bit on the high side. I don't think it does. Not when you consider the length of the contract and the form he has shown this season. Especially if he's going to be our keeper for years to come. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30368 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 read the post properly, and expand your brain for a change. I'm not explaining this again, I've done it for a long time now and it ought to be obvious. Perhaps to the clinically insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30368 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 So Colo on £77k a week and Krul on £58k. Doesn't seem to fit into our alleged "wage structure" £58k pw for Krul seems a bit on the high side. I don't think it does. Not when you consider the length of the contract and the form he has shown this season. Especially if he's going to be our keeper for years to come. I'm not saying that he doesn't deserve it. I'm just surprised at the club offering him so much. He must have a decent agent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack 9294 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 So Colo on £77k a week and Krul on £58k. Doesn't seem to fit into our alleged "wage structure" I believe the wage structure is set as a % of turnover, if the income goes higher, so can (and will) the wages. It's not a ceiling based on a cap at any particular weekly wage level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted March 5, 2012 Author Share Posted March 5, 2012 Hart is on £90k. I reckon De Gea will be on similar. £60k a week is cheap for a keeper of Kruls quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JawD 99 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 Hang on LM, you're losing me here. Do you think Colo and Krul should have been given new contracts? Or are you saying damned if they do damned if they dont? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 Hang on LM, you're losing me here. Do you think Colo and Krul should have been given new contracts? Or are you saying damned if they do damned if they dont? do you seriously think that NUFC should be selling their best players to meet so called "operational costs" ? Do you seriously not understand this ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted March 5, 2012 Author Share Posted March 5, 2012 Leazes doesn't allow events to take him "off message". You have to respect that single minded devotion to wrong headed beligerence and faith (or the opposite of faith, what's that? cynicism?) in the owner. On a long enough timeline he'll always be right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21846 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 Show of intent if there's truth in it. Rewarding our best players with improved contracts. It's the right thing to do a long as its not a tactic aimed to hike up a transfer fee in the summer ala Carroll. Was Carroll's new contract aimed at hiking up the transfer fee? arguably, yes. they knew other clubs were interested in him and signed him to a long term deal just months before selling him for a vastly inflated fee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 So Colo on £77k a week and Krul on £58k. Doesn't seem to fit into our alleged "wage structure" I believe the wage structure is set as a % of turnover, if the income goes higher, so can (and will) the wages. It's not a ceiling based on a cap at any particular weekly wage level. please tell us when Spurs have sold their best players to pay the wages of other players, as you constantly harp on about them and tell us how we are doing things like they are now ? Then make a post or two about football, if you can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 read the post properly, and expand your brain for a change. I'm not explaining this again, I've done it for a long time now and it ought to be obvious. Perhaps to the clinically insane. and you're an expert on NUFC ? Fuck off you arsehole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 Show of intent if there's truth in it. Rewarding our best players with improved contracts. It's the right thing to do a long as its not a tactic aimed to hike up a transfer fee in the summer ala Carroll. Was Carroll's new contract aimed at hiking up the transfer fee? arguably, yes. they knew other clubs were interested in him and signed him to a long term deal just months before selling him for a vastly inflated fee. which has now been stated officially by the club to have disappeared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack 9294 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 (edited) Show of intent if there's truth in it. Rewarding our best players with improved contracts. It's the right thing to do a long as its not a tactic aimed to hike up a transfer fee in the summer ala Carroll. Was Carroll's new contract aimed at hiking up the transfer fee? arguably, yes. they knew other clubs were interested in him and signed him to a long term deal just months before selling him for a vastly inflated fee. It's the only thing clubs can do to at least give them any measure of control over players leaving. Pay top whack or fuck off (or way over the top whack in Carroll's case). Edited March 5, 2012 by Toonpack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj 17 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 Show of intent if there's truth in it. Rewarding our best players with improved contracts. It's the right thing to do a long as its not a tactic aimed to hike up a transfer fee in the summer ala Carroll. Was Carroll's new contract aimed at hiking up the transfer fee? arguably, yes. they knew other clubs were interested in him and signed him to a long term deal just months before selling him for a vastly inflated fee. Or perhaps rewarded him with a new deal to reflect his form and position in our team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 Was Carroll's new contract aimed at hiking up the transfer fee? arguably, yes. they knew other clubs were interested in him and signed him to a long term deal just months before selling him for a vastly inflated fee. It's the only thing clubs can do to at elast give them any measure of control over players leaving. Pay top whack or fuck off (or way over the top whack in Carroll's case). is this a spectaclar u-turn in the making here ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack 9294 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 So Colo on £77k a week and Krul on £58k. Doesn't seem to fit into our alleged "wage structure" I believe the wage structure is set as a % of turnover, if the income goes higher, so can (and will) the wages. It's not a ceiling based on a cap at any particular weekly wage level. please tell us when Spurs have sold their best players to pay the wages of other players, as you constantly harp on about them and tell us how we are doing things like they are now ? Then make a post or two about football, if you can. All the time, they record profits on player trading every fucking year. Loon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21846 Posted March 5, 2012 Share Posted March 5, 2012 Or perhaps rewarded him with a new deal to reflect his form and position in our team? i'm not convinced the decision to sell him on for a fortune wasn't a pre-mediated and there's no disputing that having him on a long term deal strengthened our hand when it came to shafting liverpool for as much moeny as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now