Rob W 0 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 According to the "indie" this morning 31% of our goals have been scored from outside the Penalty Area - only Liverpool have scored more (33%) = crap strikers I guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Meaningless stat.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Thats manc-mag territory tbh. Anything from 25-50 yards out and I'm in range. Top right hand corner a speciality. FACT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted December 8, 2005 Author Share Posted December 8, 2005 No stat is meaningless This one shows we aren't scoring goals at close range - which is where the strikers (cough cough splutter) are supposed to be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Thats manc-mag territory tbh. Anything from 25-50 yards out and I'm in range. Top right hand corner a speciality. FACT. 65793[/snapback] Pro-evo tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Thats manc-mag territory tbh. Anything from 25-50 yards out and I'm in range. Top right hand corner a speciality. FACT. 65793[/snapback] Pro-evo tbh. 65796[/snapback] Stockport and District Sunday League Division 2 tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 No stat is meaningless This one shows we aren't scoring goals at close range - which is where the strikers (cough cough splutter) are supposed to be 65795[/snapback] No it doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Incidentally, it's rumoured Gemmill cant kick a ball into an open goal from outside the box without it bouncing AT LEAST 3 TIMES! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catmag 337 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Thats manc-mag territory tbh. Anything from 25-50 yards out and I'm in range. Top right hand corner a speciality. FACT. 65793[/snapback] Pro-evo tbh. 65796[/snapback] Stockport and District Sunday League Division 2 tbh. 65797[/snapback] Under 11's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 No stat is meaningless This one shows we aren't scoring goals at close range - which is where the strikers (cough cough splutter) are supposed to be 65795[/snapback] No it doesn't. 65805[/snapback] pedantic tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Thats manc-mag territory tbh. Anything from 25-50 yards out and I'm in range. Top right hand corner a speciality. FACT. 65793[/snapback] Pro-evo tbh. 65796[/snapback] Stockport and District Sunday League Division 2 tbh. 65797[/snapback] Under 11's 65808[/snapback] I only get a game when theres under 11 of us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 47074 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Incidentally, it's rumoured Gemmill cant kick a ball into an open goal from outside the box without it bouncing AT LEAST 3 TIMES! 65807[/snapback] Toontastic Exclusive! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetleftpeg 0 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 I used to think we didn't score nearly enough goals from outsied the area. One day we'll learn to do both and might win something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 No stat is meaningless This one shows we aren't scoring goals at close range - which is where the strikers (cough cough splutter) are supposed to be 65795[/snapback] It shows that 31% of our goals were scored from outside the box. It doesn't show how many were free-kicks, it doesn't say how many of those score closer in were from just inside the box, how many of the other 69% were from headers from set-pieces, how many were tap-ins, how many were pens. So to slightly alter my initial statement, it's a pretty meaningless stat imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 22405 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 I used to think we didn't score nearly enough goals from outsied the area. One day we'll learn to do both and might win something. 65830[/snapback] Most the goals we've scored from my memory this season have been close range efforts, I thought? I'm confused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetleftpeg 0 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 I used to think we didn't score nearly enough goals from outsied the area. One day we'll learn to do both and might win something. 65830[/snapback] Most the goals we've scored from my memory this season have been close range efforts, I thought? I'm confused. 65833[/snapback] 79% of stats are made up I think, so that probably explains it. It doesn't surprise me actually, as 31% isn't that much seeing as we haven't scored many goals. Haven't the mackems scored more league goals than us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted December 8, 2005 Author Share Posted December 8, 2005 No stat is meaningless This one shows we aren't scoring goals at close range - which is where the strikers (cough cough splutter) are supposed to be 65795[/snapback] No it doesn't. 65805[/snapback] actually you are right - it means we're scoring a higher than PL average of our goals from a distance Route 1 strikers in other words Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted December 8, 2005 Author Share Posted December 8, 2005 No stat is meaningless This one shows we aren't scoring goals at close range - which is where the strikers (cough cough splutter) are supposed to be 65795[/snapback] It shows that 31% of our goals were scored from outside the box. It doesn't show how many were free-kicks, it doesn't say how many of those score closer in were from just inside the box, how many of the other 69% were from headers from set-pieces, how many were tap-ins, how many were pens. So to slightly alter my initial statement, it's a pretty meaningless stat imo. 65831[/snapback] You've just proved my point - a simple stat and you've seen at least 5 posiible answers Are you a research scientist perchance??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyluke 2 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Goals from outside the box are just as valuable as those from inside the area. The most important stat related to our goals is that we aren't scoring enough of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 No stat is meaningless This one shows we aren't scoring goals at close range - which is where the strikers (cough cough splutter) are supposed to be 65795[/snapback] It shows that 31% of our goals were scored from outside the box. It doesn't show how many were free-kicks, it doesn't say how many of those score closer in were from just inside the box, how many of the other 69% were from headers from set-pieces, how many were tap-ins, how many were pens. So to slightly alter my initial statement, it's a pretty meaningless stat imo. 65831[/snapback] You've just proved my point - a simple stat and you've seen at least 5 posiible answers Are you a research scientist perchance??? 65901[/snapback] What I meant was the stat in itself isn't meaningful because it doesn't give enough info. So I've proved you wrong. Also, the point above about it meaning we have route one strikers is bollocks; it may well be the case but the stat you gave neither proves or disproves that. Nice try though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted December 8, 2005 Author Share Posted December 8, 2005 No stat is meaningless This one shows we aren't scoring goals at close range - which is where the strikers (cough cough splutter) are supposed to be 65795[/snapback] It shows that 31% of our goals were scored from outside the box. It doesn't show how many were free-kicks, it doesn't say how many of those score closer in were from just inside the box, how many of the other 69% were from headers from set-pieces, how many were tap-ins, how many were pens. So to slightly alter my initial statement, it's a pretty meaningless stat imo. 65831[/snapback] You've just proved my point - a simple stat and you've seen at least 5 posiible answers Are you a research scientist perchance??? 65901[/snapback] What I meant was the stat in itself isn't meaningful because it doesn't give enough info. So I've proved you wrong. Also, the point above about it meaning we have route one strikers is bollocks; it may well be the case but the stat you gave neither proves or disproves that. Nice try though 65934[/snapback] hey they're running a Dickens serial on radio 4 at 19:45 .......................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Goals from outside the box are just as valuable as those from inside the area. The most important stat related to our goals is that we aren't scoring enough of them. 65910[/snapback] Here endeth the discussion. Top post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted December 9, 2005 Author Share Posted December 9, 2005 Spoilsport Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 No stat is meaningless This one shows we aren't scoring goals at close range - which is where the strikers (cough cough splutter) are supposed to be 65795[/snapback] It shows that 31% of our goals were scored from outside the box. It doesn't show how many were free-kicks, it doesn't say how many of those score closer in were from just inside the box, how many of the other 69% were from headers from set-pieces, how many were tap-ins, how many were pens. So to slightly alter my initial statement, it's a pretty meaningless stat imo. 65831[/snapback] You've just proved my point - a simple stat and you've seen at least 5 posiible answers Are you a research scientist perchance??? 65901[/snapback] What I meant was the stat in itself isn't meaningful because it doesn't give enough info. So I've proved you wrong. Also, the point above about it meaning we have route one strikers is bollocks; it may well be the case but the stat you gave neither proves or disproves that. Nice try though 65934[/snapback] hey they're running a Dickens serial on radio 4 at 19:45 .......................... 65940[/snapback] Are you sure it isn't an adaptation of a novel by F. Scott Fitzgerald? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now