shackbleep 0 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 You're right, Leazes, we won't. Nevertheless, your relentless insistence that we should be spending 150 million RIGHT NOW and bugger the possible consequences of bankruptcy do grate. link ? Or shut up. FWIW, the accountant of this board, who he says specialises in dealing with "unsustainable business spending" encouraged such spending previously by the club, not me. The spastic of this board talking fucking nonsense again. I just come into threads I've never posted in to find you obsessing about me, you weirdo. haha, you fucking backed Souness' spending "to build his team" right to the end, you incompetent prick. If you were my accountant, I'd sack you. I can't believe you still haven't worked out that he was winding you up massively on that one all along. Come next month 5 fucking years will have passed since he was sacked! was he shite man Carry on tying yourself in knots. But every other fucker could see it plain as day - the sarcasm in some of his posts was crystal clear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac-Toon 1 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 You're right, Leazes, we won't. Nevertheless, your relentless insistence that we should be spending 150 million RIGHT NOW and bugger the possible consequences of bankruptcy do grate. link ? Or shut up. FWIW, the accountant of this board, who he says specialises in dealing with "unsustainable business spending" encouraged such spending previously by the club, not me. The spastic of this board talking fucking nonsense again. I just come into threads I've never posted in to find you obsessing about me, you weirdo. haha, you fucking backed Souness' spending "to build his team" right to the end, you incompetent prick. If you were my accountant, I'd sack you. I've not seen what was said or anything what with being new here and don't want to get involved in the turf war but surely when Sounness was our manager, which meant the board felt he was the man for the job, then he should've been backed to the hilt regardless. It's not about who's in charge, any manager who is in charge of a club, at that time, is the boards man so they should be backed until a time they are let go. Is that not what Gemmill was getting at? You won't know what I'm laughing at like, being new on here. Am I echoing the sentiments of another TT member? For the record, I didn't like Souness but the point about backing your man is valid. Aye, Leazes. Then he's right. A board I'd like to see is one of conviction who will back whoever they have in charge and bullet a manger who they don't fancy. Not keep a manager they don't want and not back him. He is, aye. Don't see how he can have a pop at Gemmill for having virtually the same view though. Even worse when it's been gone over about 500 times at least since then. Not having a pop at you or owt. That's where my confusion lies. It seems that their view is the same. Gemmill saying he should be back as he was FFS man and Leazes saying the same bar he should've been sacked sooner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 You're right, Leazes, we won't. Nevertheless, your relentless insistence that we should be spending 150 million RIGHT NOW and bugger the possible consequences of bankruptcy do grate. link ? Or shut up. FWIW, the accountant of this board, who he says specialises in dealing with "unsustainable business spending" encouraged such spending previously by the club, not me. The spastic of this board talking fucking nonsense again. I just come into threads I've never posted in to find you obsessing about me, you weirdo. haha, you fucking backed Souness' spending "to build his team" right to the end, you incompetent prick. If you were my accountant, I'd sack you. I've not seen what was said or anything what with being new here and don't want to get involved in the turf war but surely when Sounness was our manager, which meant the board felt he was the man for the job, then he should've been backed to the hilt regardless. It's not about who's in charge, any manager who is in charge of a club, at that time, is the boards man so they should be backed until a time they are let go. Is that not what Gemmill was getting at? You won't know what I'm laughing at like, being new on here. Am I echoing the sentiments of another TT member? For the record, I didn't like Souness but the point about backing your man is valid. Aye, Leazes. Then he's right. A board I'd like to see is one of conviction who will back whoever they have in charge and bullet a manger who they don't fancy. Not keep a manager they don't want and not back him. yes, indeed. To that degree, Ashley was right to sack Hughton if he himself didn't want him long term, what we think as supporters is irrelevant to him because he is the owner. He might back Pardew, to the tune expected of one of the great English football clubs, I hope he does, hopefully he may have learned by now but we will see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 You're right, Leazes, we won't. Nevertheless, your relentless insistence that we should be spending 150 million RIGHT NOW and bugger the possible consequences of bankruptcy do grate. link ? Or shut up. FWIW, the accountant of this board, who he says specialises in dealing with "unsustainable business spending" encouraged such spending previously by the club, not me. The spastic of this board talking fucking nonsense again. I just come into threads I've never posted in to find you obsessing about me, you weirdo. haha, you fucking backed Souness' spending "to build his team" right to the end, you incompetent prick. If you were my accountant, I'd sack you. I've not seen what was said or anything what with being new here asEnd don't want to get involved in the turf war but surely when Sounness was our manager, which meant the board felt he was the man for the job, then he should've been backed to the hilt regardless. It's not about who's in charge, any manager who is in charge of a club, at that time, is the boards man so they should be backed until a time they are let go. Is that not what Gemmill was getting at? Honestly mate, you're wasting your time here. Leazes ties himself in knots arguing that the chairman should always back his manager then pointing the finger and saying haha you said the chairman should back Souness. He's completely unacquainted with logic, even when presented in childlike simplicity. I advise not bothering. it's quite simple lad, even for you, back your man or sack him when you lose confidence in him. It was obvious to most people, but not you, the master accountant, that Souness was not working and was throwing money away. Are you still a diehard supporter or still commenting from the outside ie sitting in your armchair and talking bollocks ? Cooeeeee! how old - and intelligent - are you ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 You're right, Leazes, we won't. Nevertheless, your relentless insistence that we should be spending 150 million RIGHT NOW and bugger the possible consequences of bankruptcy do grate. link ? Or shut up. FWIW, the accountant of this board, who he says specialises in dealing with "unsustainable business spending" encouraged such spending previously by the club, not me. The spastic of this board talking fucking nonsense again. I just come into threads I've never posted in to find you obsessing about me, you weirdo. haha, you fucking backed Souness' spending "to build his team" right to the end, you incompetent prick. If you were my accountant, I'd sack you. I can't believe you still haven't worked out that he was winding you up massively on that one all along. Come next month 5 fucking years will have passed since he was sacked! was he shite man Carry on tying yourself in knots. But every other fucker could see it plain as day - the sarcasm in some of his posts was crystal clear. bollocks. Hundreds of posts on here and on NO. He knows it. Ginger, fat and stupid, what a combination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46199 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 35. And I was brighter as a child than you are at 56. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 6801 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Oh not again. FFS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBass 2727 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 If Arsenal win the LC and one of the top 6 win the FA Cup and we finish 7th then we would qualify for the Europa League. Look at the teams around us, look at our form....have a bit of faith....allow yourself to dream. ---Harper--- ---Simpson---Taylor---Coloccini---Enrique--- ---Barton---Nolan ©---Tiote---Gutierrez--- ------Carroll---Ben Arfa----- Subs: Krul, Williamson, Kadar, Gosling, Guthrie, Routledge and Best. Back Up: Campbell, Raylor, Perch, Smith, Vuckic, Shola, Lovenkrands and Xisco. I actually think that squad there is more than capable of finishing 7th....im not saying we will but look at the teams around us! A few more signings albeit on loan or not and it will only boost our chances. Good supply of opium down the coast is there????? Next two home games are Tottenham and Arsenal we'd need to win both to have a chance. Bolton are in pole position, and the dippers will bounce back once WOY is sacked later today. Sad but true. Anyone saying that Liverpool won't finish top 10 is about as deluded as those saying we'll qualify for Europe imo. Here's hoping that sentence comes back to bite me in the ass on both counts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acrossthepond 878 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 In a world of my choosing, we'd finish just below European qualification and build up the squad over the summer to have a real tilt at 5th or 6th next season. But the primary objective this season was safety and I think we've just about done enough, so now we just have to focus on winning as many games as possible and moving as far up the table as possible. If that takes us to 6th, 7th, or 8th I'll be overjoyed but 10th would be a great result and 15th would do me tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest You FCB Get Out Of Our Club Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 can't believe people turning their noses up at the europa league, though I can see the logic. it's important to the players, keeping good ones, signing better ones. it's important to progress. having said that, I would say there's a very slim chance of qualifying. thought we were safely mid table this season under hughton, was genuinely concerned when he was sacked, but with the pleasant surprise of 6 points from the last 2, I'd say we're safe at least. Look no disrepect todumb, but you live in a country populated by deluded Celtic fans. They would give their right clem to go on a run like they did in 2003, but in essence when teams like Boro, Celtic, Fulham and Rangers are capable of getting to the final, then you have to ask yourself what is the point. Between 2003 and 2007 we must've played 50 games in the uefa, won probably 40, the vast majority against total wank. It's worse than the league cup imo, even when we played and beat Palermo the last good european night we had it was two reserve sides. It's a wank cup, I hate it. It's been shit since the CL went to 4 teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest You FCB Get Out Of Our Club Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 You're right, Leazes, we won't. Nevertheless, your relentless insistence that we should be spending 150 million RIGHT NOW and bugger the possible consequences of bankruptcy do grate. link ? Or shut up. FWIW, the accountant of this board, who he says specialises in dealing with "unsustainable business spending" encouraged such spending previously by the club, not me. The spastic of this board talking fucking nonsense again. I just come into threads I've never posted in to find you obsessing about me, you weirdo. haha, you fucking backed Souness' spending "to build his team" right to the end, you incompetent prick. If you were my accountant, I'd sack you. I can't believe you still haven't worked out that he was winding you up massively on that one all along. Come next month 5 fucking years will have passed since he was sacked! was he shite man Carry on tying yourself in knots. But every other fucker could see it plain as day - the sarcasm in some of his posts was crystal clear. bollocks. Hundreds of posts on here and on NO. He knows it. Ginger, fat and stupid, what a combination. That's a bit below the belt though. I'd never abuse someones looks on here even though there's plenty of room to with some. Fair enough abuse each others views and persona, but it shouldn't get really personal like that imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 france is populated by deluded celtic fans? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 so deluded they're supporting marseille Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46199 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 You're right, Leazes, we won't. Nevertheless, your relentless insistence that we should be spending 150 million RIGHT NOW and bugger the possible consequences of bankruptcy do grate. link ? Or shut up. FWIW, the accountant of this board, who he says specialises in dealing with "unsustainable business spending" encouraged such spending previously by the club, not me. The spastic of this board talking fucking nonsense again. I just come into threads I've never posted in to find you obsessing about me, you weirdo. haha, you fucking backed Souness' spending "to build his team" right to the end, you incompetent prick. If you were my accountant, I'd sack you. I can't believe you still haven't worked out that he was winding you up massively on that one all along. Come next month 5 fucking years will have passed since he was sacked! was he shite man Carry on tying yourself in knots. But every other fucker could see it plain as day - the sarcasm in some of his posts was crystal clear. bollocks. Hundreds of posts on here and on NO. He knows it. Ginger, fat and stupid, what a combination. That's a bit below the belt though. I'd never abuse someones looks on here even though there's plenty of room to with some. Fair enough abuse each others views and persona, but it shouldn't get really personal like that imo. 1 out of 3 so I'm not too worried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 not sure which one he's got right tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46199 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46199 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 I prefer overweight to fat though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 not sure which one he's got right tbh He's not really ginger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest You FCB Get Out Of Our Club Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 so deluded they're supporting marseille Vieux Port CSC innit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest You FCB Get Out Of Our Club Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 I prefer overweight to fat though. You weigh less than me! I'm not fat. You look like you've got the same hair colour as Gary Bailey too, donno where the ginger myth came from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 I prefer overweight to fat though. You weigh less than me! I'm not fat. You look like you've got the same hair colour as Gary Bailey too, donno where the ginger myth came from. Strawberry blonde? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46199 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 I prefer overweight to fat though. You weigh less than me! I'm not fat. You look like you've got the same hair colour as Gary Bailey too, donno where the ginger myth came from. I'm joining the works gym today too. HNNNGHHH *flexes* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31237 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 That's a bit below the belt though. I'd never abuse someones looks on here even though there's plenty of room to with some. Fair enough abuse each others views and persona, but it shouldn't get really personal like that imo. Apart from calling me a chubby Irish pissed up nonce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 You're right, Leazes, we won't. Nevertheless, your relentless insistence that we should be spending 150 million RIGHT NOW and bugger the possible consequences of bankruptcy do grate. link ? Or shut up. FWIW, the accountant of this board, who he says specialises in dealing with "unsustainable business spending" encouraged such spending previously by the club, not me. The spastic of this board talking fucking nonsense again. I just come into threads I've never posted in to find you obsessing about me, you weirdo. haha, you fucking backed Souness' spending "to build his team" right to the end, you incompetent prick. If you were my accountant, I'd sack you. I can't believe you still haven't worked out that he was winding you up massively on that one all along. Come next month 5 fucking years will have passed since he was sacked! was he shite man Carry on tying yourself in knots. But every other fucker could see it plain as day - the sarcasm in some of his posts was crystal clear. bollocks. Hundreds of posts on here and on NO. He knows it. Ginger, fat and stupid, what a combination. That's a bit below the belt though. I'd never abuse someones looks on here even though there's plenty of room to with some. Fair enough abuse each others views and persona, but it shouldn't get really personal like that imo. well, saying your daughter is a product of incest is pretty below the belt too and that seems to be OK, and not too many people said so, in fact the fat ginger cunt supported the wanker who stated that. Anyway, Gemmill chooses to come on here and disagree with me in similar tones to how I disagree with him Stevie, and on this particular situation ref Souness I am correct and he knows it. I'm quite prepared to stop the comments to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest You FCB Get Out Of Our Club Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 You're right, Leazes, we won't. Nevertheless, your relentless insistence that we should be spending 150 million RIGHT NOW and bugger the possible consequences of bankruptcy do grate. link ? Or shut up. FWIW, the accountant of this board, who he says specialises in dealing with "unsustainable business spending" encouraged such spending previously by the club, not me. The spastic of this board talking fucking nonsense again. I just come into threads I've never posted in to find you obsessing about me, you weirdo. haha, you fucking backed Souness' spending "to build his team" right to the end, you incompetent prick. If you were my accountant, I'd sack you. I can't believe you still haven't worked out that he was winding you up massively on that one all along. Come next month 5 fucking years will have passed since he was sacked! was he shite man Carry on tying yourself in knots. But every other fucker could see it plain as day - the sarcasm in some of his posts was crystal clear. bollocks. Hundreds of posts on here and on NO. He knows it. Ginger, fat and stupid, what a combination. That's a bit below the belt though. I'd never abuse someones looks on here even though there's plenty of room to with some. Fair enough abuse each others views and persona, but it shouldn't get really personal like that imo. well, saying your daughter is a product of incest is pretty below the belt too and that seems to be OK, and not too many people said so, in fact the fat ginger cunt supported the wanker who stated that. Anyway, Gemmill chooses to come on here and disagree with me in similar tones to how I disagree with him Stevie, and on this particular situation ref Souness I am correct and he knows it. I'm quite prepared to stop the comments to him. Who said that like? Disgusting. Did they just say inbred to you, or make reference to her. I'd rise above that shite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now