Tom 14013 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 Coin. Eye Glasses. Flight case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 Coin. Eye Glasses. Flight case. Rosharch calender. Cocteau twins. Wailing wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 "Fancy a bit of creme on that luv"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14013 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 Coin. Eye Glasses. Flight case. Rosharch calender. Cocteau twins. Wailing wall. Note to Mr.Choudry. Bowler Hat. flag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4786 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 Did he say anything of interest? Did he ever? naughty naughty After losing out so badly to fist, obviously now aiming for next years wanker o the year poll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 You're a dead man walking with two wins in 9 home games. you're severely limited by the limitations of your players. It's dignified, but you don't get prizes for being dignified, any more so than trying to do a job with your hands tied behind your back. And thats my last word on this, but I really don't understand how people can blame Hughton too much. A bit like when your man tied SBR's hands with the signings of N'Zogbia (similar situation to the Gosling transfer), Pievert on a free, and signed Nicky Butt against Sir Bob's wishes. But I suppose you'll see that as backing his manager, whereas the signing of a world cup midfielder and getting Ben Arfa in on a season long loan with a view to a perm deal is tying his hands. sigh. Bellamy, Robert, Viana, Jenas, Bramble, Ferguson, Solano, Given, Dyer, Milner, Domi, Maric, Duff, Martins, Owen, Carr, Goma, Parker etc etc, there are more....how many more times are you going to go down this road. And wtf are you talking about ref N'Zogbia ???? What is the significance of reeling off those players? They weren't all signed the summer before he was sacked. How did you feel about the N'Zogbia signing? Did you think we should have been buying players from lower divison french clubs? Or is it only Mike Ashley who gets criticism for wanting to sign quality from lower divisions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 33709 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 You're a dead man walking with two wins in 9 home games. you're severely limited by the limitations of your players. It's dignified, but you don't get prizes for being dignified, any more so than trying to do a job with your hands tied behind your back. And thats my last word on this, but I really don't understand how people can blame Hughton too much. A bit like when your man tied SBR's hands with the signings of N'Zogbia (similar situation to the Gosling transfer), Pievert on a free, and signed Nicky Butt against Sir Bob's wishes. But I suppose you'll see that as backing his manager, whereas the signing of a world cup midfielder and getting Ben Arfa in on a season long loan with a view to a perm deal is tying his hands. sigh. Bellamy, Robert, Viana, Jenas, Bramble, Ferguson, Solano, Given, Dyer, Milner, Domi, Maric, Duff, Martins, Owen, Carr, Goma, Parker etc etc, there are more....how many more times are you going to go down this road. And wtf are you talking about ref N'Zogbia ???? What is the significance of reeling off those players? They weren't all signed the summer before he was sacked. How did you feel about the N'Zogbia signing? Did you think we should have been buying players from lower divison french clubs? Or is it only Mike Ashley who gets criticism for wanting to sign quality from lower divisions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 You're a dead man walking with two wins in 9 home games. you're severely limited by the limitations of your players. It's dignified, but you don't get prizes for being dignified, any more so than trying to do a job with your hands tied behind your back. And thats my last word on this, but I really don't understand how people can blame Hughton too much. A bit like when your man tied SBR's hands with the signings of N'Zogbia (similar situation to the Gosling transfer), Pievert on a free, and signed Nicky Butt against Sir Bob's wishes. But I suppose you'll see that as backing his manager, whereas the signing of a world cup midfielder and getting Ben Arfa in on a season long loan with a view to a perm deal is tying his hands. sigh. Bellamy, Robert, Viana, Jenas, Bramble, Ferguson, Solano, Given, Dyer, Milner, Domi, Maric, Duff, Martins, Owen, Carr, Goma, Parker etc etc, there are more....how many more times are you going to go down this road. And wtf are you talking about ref N'Zogbia ???? What is the significance of reeling off those players? They weren't all signed the summer before he was sacked. How did you feel about the N'Zogbia signing? Did you think we should have been buying players from lower divison french clubs? Or is it only Mike Ashley who gets criticism for wanting to sign quality from lower divisions? sigh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 You're a dead man walking with two wins in 9 home games. you're severely limited by the limitations of your players. It's dignified, but you don't get prizes for being dignified, any more so than trying to do a job with your hands tied behind your back. And thats my last word on this, but I really don't understand how people can blame Hughton too much. A bit like when your man tied SBR's hands with the signings of N'Zogbia (similar situation to the Gosling transfer), Pievert on a free, and signed Nicky Butt against Sir Bob's wishes. But I suppose you'll see that as backing his manager, whereas the signing of a world cup midfielder and getting Ben Arfa in on a season long loan with a view to a perm deal is tying his hands. sigh. Bellamy, Robert, Viana, Jenas, Bramble, Ferguson, Solano, Given, Dyer, Milner, Domi, Maric, Duff, Martins, Owen, Carr, Goma, Parker etc etc, there are more....how many more times are you going to go down this road. And wtf are you talking about ref N'Zogbia ???? What is the significance of reeling off those players? They weren't all signed the summer before he was sacked. How did you feel about the N'Zogbia signing? Did you think we should have been buying players from lower divison french clubs? Or is it only Mike Ashley who gets criticism for wanting to sign quality from lower divisions? sigh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 You're a dead man walking with two wins in 9 home games. you're severely limited by the limitations of your players. It's dignified, but you don't get prizes for being dignified, any more so than trying to do a job with your hands tied behind your back. And thats my last word on this, but I really don't understand how people can blame Hughton too much. A bit like when your man tied SBR's hands with the signings of N'Zogbia (similar situation to the Gosling transfer), Pievert on a free, and signed Nicky Butt against Sir Bob's wishes. But I suppose you'll see that as backing his manager, whereas the signing of a world cup midfielder and getting Ben Arfa in on a season long loan with a view to a perm deal is tying his hands. sigh. Bellamy, Robert, Viana, Jenas, Bramble, Ferguson, Solano, Given, Dyer, Milner, Domi, Maric, Duff, Martins, Owen, Carr, Goma, Parker etc etc, there are more....how many more times are you going to go down this road. And wtf are you talking about ref N'Zogbia ???? What is the significance of reeling off those players? They weren't all signed the summer before he was sacked. How did you feel about the N'Zogbia signing? Did you think we should have been buying players from lower divison french clubs? Or is it only Mike Ashley who gets criticism for wanting to sign quality from lower divisions? sigh when your man brings players of the quality of that lot and in similar amounts then you might have a point. Until then..... sigh. If he sells up, I bet you would be devastated to see us back into europe and doing precisely what I'm outlining to you ? sigh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 You're a dead man walking with two wins in 9 home games. you're severely limited by the limitations of your players. It's dignified, but you don't get prizes for being dignified, any more so than trying to do a job with your hands tied behind your back. And thats my last word on this, but I really don't understand how people can blame Hughton too much. A bit like when your man tied SBR's hands with the signings of N'Zogbia (similar situation to the Gosling transfer), Pievert on a free, and signed Nicky Butt against Sir Bob's wishes. But I suppose you'll see that as backing his manager, whereas the signing of a world cup midfielder and getting Ben Arfa in on a season long loan with a view to a perm deal is tying his hands. sigh. Bellamy, Robert, Viana, Jenas, Bramble, Ferguson, Solano, Given, Dyer, Milner, Domi, Maric, Duff, Martins, Owen, Carr, Goma, Parker etc etc, there are more....how many more times are you going to go down this road. And wtf are you talking about ref N'Zogbia ???? What is the significance of reeling off those players? They weren't all signed the summer before he was sacked. How did you feel about the N'Zogbia signing? Did you think we should have been buying players from lower divison french clubs? Or is it only Mike Ashley who gets criticism for wanting to sign quality from lower divisions? sigh when your man brings players of the quality of that lot and in similar amounts then you might have a point. Until then..... sigh. If he sells up, I bet you would be devastated to see us back into europe and doing precisely what I'm outlining to you ? sigh. The money isn't there to buy that quality again, because your man spent it before we'd received it. How do you propose he signs them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 You're a dead man walking with two wins in 9 home games. you're severely limited by the limitations of your players. It's dignified, but you don't get prizes for being dignified, any more so than trying to do a job with your hands tied behind your back. And thats my last word on this, but I really don't understand how people can blame Hughton too much. A bit like when your man tied SBR's hands with the signings of N'Zogbia (similar situation to the Gosling transfer), Pievert on a free, and signed Nicky Butt against Sir Bob's wishes. But I suppose you'll see that as backing his manager, whereas the signing of a world cup midfielder and getting Ben Arfa in on a season long loan with a view to a perm deal is tying his hands. sigh. Bellamy, Robert, Viana, Jenas, Bramble, Ferguson, Solano, Given, Dyer, Milner, Domi, Maric, Duff, Martins, Owen, Carr, Goma, Parker etc etc, there are more....how many more times are you going to go down this road. And wtf are you talking about ref N'Zogbia ???? What is the significance of reeling off those players? They weren't all signed the summer before he was sacked. How did you feel about the N'Zogbia signing? Did you think we should have been buying players from lower divison french clubs? Or is it only Mike Ashley who gets criticism for wanting to sign quality from lower divisions? sigh when your man brings players of the quality of that lot and in similar amounts then you might have a point. Until then..... sigh. If he sells up, I bet you would be devastated to see us back into europe and doing precisely what I'm outlining to you ? sigh. The money isn't there to buy that quality again, because your man spent it before we'd received it. How do you propose he signs them? he obviously thinks the way to do it is to preside over a football club with declining support and revenue. In other words, precisely the sort of club which the Halls and Shepherd found in 1991. Oh, never mind ....... sigh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 You're a dead man walking with two wins in 9 home games. you're severely limited by the limitations of your players. It's dignified, but you don't get prizes for being dignified, any more so than trying to do a job with your hands tied behind your back. And thats my last word on this, but I really don't understand how people can blame Hughton too much. A bit like when your man tied SBR's hands with the signings of N'Zogbia (similar situation to the Gosling transfer), Pievert on a free, and signed Nicky Butt against Sir Bob's wishes. But I suppose you'll see that as backing his manager, whereas the signing of a world cup midfielder and getting Ben Arfa in on a season long loan with a view to a perm deal is tying his hands. sigh. Bellamy, Robert, Viana, Jenas, Bramble, Ferguson, Solano, Given, Dyer, Milner, Domi, Maric, Duff, Martins, Owen, Carr, Goma, Parker etc etc, there are more....how many more times are you going to go down this road. And wtf are you talking about ref N'Zogbia ???? What is the significance of reeling off those players? They weren't all signed the summer before he was sacked. How did you feel about the N'Zogbia signing? Did you think we should have been buying players from lower divison french clubs? Or is it only Mike Ashley who gets criticism for wanting to sign quality from lower divisions? sigh when your man brings players of the quality of that lot and in similar amounts then you might have a point. Until then..... sigh. If he sells up, I bet you would be devastated to see us back into europe and doing precisely what I'm outlining to you ? sigh. The money isn't there to buy that quality again, because your man spent it before we'd received it. How do you propose he signs them? he obviously thinks the way to do it is to preside over a football club with declining support and revenue. In other words, precisely the sort of club which the Halls and Shepherd found in 1991. Oh, never mind ....... sigh. I didn't ask that. Sigh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 You're a dead man walking with two wins in 9 home games. you're severely limited by the limitations of your players. It's dignified, but you don't get prizes for being dignified, any more so than trying to do a job with your hands tied behind your back. And thats my last word on this, but I really don't understand how people can blame Hughton too much. A bit like when your man tied SBR's hands with the signings of N'Zogbia (similar situation to the Gosling transfer), Pievert on a free, and signed Nicky Butt against Sir Bob's wishes. But I suppose you'll see that as backing his manager, whereas the signing of a world cup midfielder and getting Ben Arfa in on a season long loan with a view to a perm deal is tying his hands. sigh. Bellamy, Robert, Viana, Jenas, Bramble, Ferguson, Solano, Given, Dyer, Milner, Domi, Maric, Duff, Martins, Owen, Carr, Goma, Parker etc etc, there are more....how many more times are you going to go down this road. And wtf are you talking about ref N'Zogbia ???? What is the significance of reeling off those players? They weren't all signed the summer before he was sacked. How did you feel about the N'Zogbia signing? Did you think we should have been buying players from lower divison french clubs? Or is it only Mike Ashley who gets criticism for wanting to sign quality from lower divisions? sigh when your man brings players of the quality of that lot and in similar amounts then you might have a point. Until then..... sigh. If he sells up, I bet you would be devastated to see us back into europe and doing precisely what I'm outlining to you ? sigh. The money isn't there to buy that quality again, because your man spent it before we'd received it. How do you propose he signs them? he obviously thinks the way to do it is to preside over a football club with declining support and revenue. In other words, precisely the sort of club which the Halls and Shepherd found in 1991. Oh, never mind ....... sigh. I didn't ask that. Sigh. I know you didn't but how do you think the Halls and Shepherd got the money coming in to do it ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 You're a dead man walking with two wins in 9 home games. you're severely limited by the limitations of your players. It's dignified, but you don't get prizes for being dignified, any more so than trying to do a job with your hands tied behind your back. And thats my last word on this, but I really don't understand how people can blame Hughton too much. A bit like when your man tied SBR's hands with the signings of N'Zogbia (similar situation to the Gosling transfer), Pievert on a free, and signed Nicky Butt against Sir Bob's wishes. But I suppose you'll see that as backing his manager, whereas the signing of a world cup midfielder and getting Ben Arfa in on a season long loan with a view to a perm deal is tying his hands. sigh. Bellamy, Robert, Viana, Jenas, Bramble, Ferguson, Solano, Given, Dyer, Milner, Domi, Maric, Duff, Martins, Owen, Carr, Goma, Parker etc etc, there are more....how many more times are you going to go down this road. And wtf are you talking about ref N'Zogbia ???? What is the significance of reeling off those players? They weren't all signed the summer before he was sacked. How did you feel about the N'Zogbia signing? Did you think we should have been buying players from lower divison french clubs? Or is it only Mike Ashley who gets criticism for wanting to sign quality from lower divisions? sigh when your man brings players of the quality of that lot and in similar amounts then you might have a point. Until then..... sigh. If he sells up, I bet you would be devastated to see us back into europe and doing precisely what I'm outlining to you ? sigh. The money isn't there to buy that quality again, because your man spent it before we'd received it. How do you propose he signs them? he obviously thinks the way to do it is to preside over a football club with declining support and revenue. In other words, precisely the sort of club which the Halls and Shepherd found in 1991. Oh, never mind ....... sigh. I didn't ask that. Sigh. I know you didn't but how do you think the Halls and Shepherd got the money coming in to do it ? They didn't, they borrowed future money, which is kind of the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 You're a dead man walking with two wins in 9 home games. you're severely limited by the limitations of your players. It's dignified, but you don't get prizes for being dignified, any more so than trying to do a job with your hands tied behind your back. And thats my last word on this, but I really don't understand how people can blame Hughton too much. A bit like when your man tied SBR's hands with the signings of N'Zogbia (similar situation to the Gosling transfer), Pievert on a free, and signed Nicky Butt against Sir Bob's wishes. But I suppose you'll see that as backing his manager, whereas the signing of a world cup midfielder and getting Ben Arfa in on a season long loan with a view to a perm deal is tying his hands. sigh. Bellamy, Robert, Viana, Jenas, Bramble, Ferguson, Solano, Given, Dyer, Milner, Domi, Maric, Duff, Martins, Owen, Carr, Goma, Parker etc etc, there are more....how many more times are you going to go down this road. And wtf are you talking about ref N'Zogbia ???? What is the significance of reeling off those players? They weren't all signed the summer before he was sacked. How did you feel about the N'Zogbia signing? Did you think we should have been buying players from lower divison french clubs? Or is it only Mike Ashley who gets criticism for wanting to sign quality from lower divisions? sigh when your man brings players of the quality of that lot and in similar amounts then you might have a point. Until then..... sigh. If he sells up, I bet you would be devastated to see us back into europe and doing precisely what I'm outlining to you ? sigh. The money isn't there to buy that quality again, because your man spent it before we'd received it. How do you propose he signs them? he obviously thinks the way to do it is to preside over a football club with declining support and revenue. In other words, precisely the sort of club which the Halls and Shepherd found in 1991. Oh, never mind ....... sigh. I didn't ask that. Sigh. I know you didn't but how do you think the Halls and Shepherd got the money coming in to do it ? They didn't, they borrowed future money, which is kind of the point. in 1992 ? Give it a rest man. Your man is taking the club downwards and downwards. The support is falling, the expectations have fallen, the profile of the club has fallen, the sponsors have disappeared, the revenue has fallen, next season when the season ticket deal is finished those sales will be down, we have sold most of our best players from a few years ago and replaced them with cheaper replacements of lower standards, our manager is the lowest paid in the premiership, top players don't see us as a top club anymore etc etc. Give it a rest, and admit you've been spouting shite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 And all that because the previous regime let debt spiral out of control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 And all that because the previous regime let debt spiral out of control. who ? McKeag, Seymour etc ? Or Ashley ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 And all that because the previous regime let debt spiral out of control. who ? McKeag, Seymour etc ? Or Ashley ? The Halls and Shepherd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 (edited) And all that because the previous regime let debt spiral out of control. who ? McKeag, Seymour etc ? Or Ashley ? The Halls and Shepherd. how much do you think we are going to owe to Ashley by the time he has finished with the club in return for relegation and utter mediocrity ? He has set the club back 20 years, but I know you won't understand because you don't want to. Sigh Edit. Will you be dismayed when he sells the club ? Edited December 24, 2010 by LeazesMag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 And all that because the previous regime let debt spiral out of control. who ? McKeag, Seymour etc ? Or Ashley ? The Halls and Shepherd. how much do you think we are going to owe to Ashley by the time he has finished with the club in return for relegation and utter mediocrity ? He has set the club back 20 years, but I know you won't understand because you don't want to. Sigh Edit. Will you be dismayed when he sells the club ? It depends on the buyer, obviously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 And all that because the previous regime let debt spiral out of control. who ? McKeag, Seymour etc ? Or Ashley ? The Halls and Shepherd. how much do you think we are going to owe to Ashley by the time he has finished with the club in return for relegation and utter mediocrity ? He has set the club back 20 years, but I know you won't understand because you don't want to. Sigh Edit. Will you be dismayed when he sells the club ? It depends on the buyer, obviously. but you think he's doing well though ? So it would take someone quite special to do better fuck me sideways. How much debt do you think we will owe Ashley when he goes, as we now owe him 200m ? because he's "paid off the debts" It has been explained to you before about the expansion of the stadium and the debts incurred was small price for 15 years of high profile and regular european football etc etc... fuck me. Why do I bother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 And all that because the previous regime let debt spiral out of control. who ? McKeag, Seymour etc ? Or Ashley ? The Halls and Shepherd. how much do you think we are going to owe to Ashley by the time he has finished with the club in return for relegation and utter mediocrity ? He has set the club back 20 years, but I know you won't understand because you don't want to. Sigh Edit. Will you be dismayed when he sells the club ? It depends on the buyer, obviously. but you think he's doing well though ? So it would take someone quite special to do better fuck me sideways. How much debt do you think we will owe Ashley when he goes, as we now owe him 200m ? because he's "paid off the debts" It has been explained to you before about the expansion of the stadium and the debts incurred was small price for 15 years of high profile and regular european football etc etc... fuck me. Why do I bother. Because you're a tiresome wanker who fails to take on board any points put to him. How do you propose we pay off debts when the club is running at a loss? Do you think we'd be excused from repaying them on the basis of having european football? I don't. Would you prefer the team we had on the day the club was sold, or the team that we have now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin 1 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 a fucking thread about a nice honest man was hijacked by 2 of the biggest fucking twats on the forum, for fuck sake, will you two just pm this shit or fuck off. pick one, miserable wankers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 And all that because the previous regime let debt spiral out of control. who ? McKeag, Seymour etc ? Or Ashley ? The Halls and Shepherd. how much do you think we are going to owe to Ashley by the time he has finished with the club in return for relegation and utter mediocrity ? He has set the club back 20 years, but I know you won't understand because you don't want to. Sigh Edit. Will you be dismayed when he sells the club ? It depends on the buyer, obviously. but you think he's doing well though ? So it would take someone quite special to do better fuck me sideways. How much debt do you think we will owe Ashley when he goes, as we now owe him 200m ? because he's "paid off the debts" It has been explained to you before about the expansion of the stadium and the debts incurred was small price for 15 years of high profile and regular european football etc etc... fuck me. Why do I bother. Because you're a tiresome wanker who fails to take on board any points put to him. How do you propose we pay off debts when the club is running at a loss? Do you think we'd be excused from repaying them on the basis of having european football? I don't. Would you prefer the team we had on the day the club was sold, or the team that we have now? the team we had when it was sold to Ashley, and what sort of stupid question is that ? You keep asking the same questions, but you completely fail to grasp the point that everybody in football who wants success is losing money. Every team in the premiership is losing money [bar Stoke, supposedly]. So much of an idealistic idiot do you want to be ? Why do you think we can for some reason miraculously become the only club in the premiership who can be successful without spending big money and probably going into debt to do it ? I had this discussion with so many fuckwits on Newcastle Online who actually thought I was trying to wind them up and eventually got banned for it, they were so stupid, and you are the same. As Happy Face said so correctly a few weeks ago. Mike Ashley by operating at the level he is operating at, is completely negating all our advantages we have over the likes of Burnley, Blackburn etc by not taking advantage of our fanbase. You're living in cloud cuckoo-land. Time to leave this. Sigh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now