So when are we going to start.....

[manc-mag 1]

Jesus Christ!

 

That's left me in fucking tears!

 

 

I had tears rolling down my face watching that.

 

That's forever the expression on Leazes face and music going through his head for me now as he posts.

[LeazesMag 0]

Literally every thread he's involves in results in the majority explaining to Leazes that his debate style is inherently flawed.

 

I'm worried he has Alzheimer's.

 

I'm sure he'll now reply by accusing me of either a ) holding an incredible position that I simply never have or, b ) reference the old board.

 

Are you sitting comfortably,? Then lets see what happens next

 

people are watching comprehension and use of English on here mate.

 

 

What is your opinion on the subject of this thread by the way. Try staying on topic as most have not so far. That is called comprehension ....

 

 

i swore i wouldn't respond to you anymore...but, weren't you on here the other day tsk tsking someone for pointing out a grammatical or spelling error in your post?

 

i can't seem to find it but i'm sure someone else could.

 

fwiw....if they can't deport the criminal in your article due to a loophole in the current legislation, then why hasn't he been locked up? or has he?

 

Allahu Akbar

 

overt maturity on display....

 

not really, its just pointless responding to you.

 

 

Anyone else = childish.

You = because it's pointless responding.

 

 

YOU could make it up.

 

So what do YOU think of the opening post ?

 

I think it was another chance for you to brand all asylum seekers as scum.

 

now now kiddah, I've never said that, only terrorists and terrorist sympathisers. Comprehend ?

[LeazesMag 0]

Jesus Christ!

 

That's left me in fucking tears!

 

 

I had tears rolling down my face watching that.

 

That's forever the expression on Leazes face and music going through his head for me now as he posts.

 

obsessed

[The Fish 10764]

Pair jailed for race-hate crimes

 

By Alistair Keely, Press Association

 

Friday, 10 July 2009

 

 

Two men were jailed today for inciting racial hatred online.

 

Simon Sheppard, 52, was sentenced to four years and 10 months while Stephen Whittle, 42, was given a term of two years and four months after being convicted of a number of race-hate crimes.

 

 

Leeds Crown Court was told that Whittle wrote offensive articles which were then published on the internet by Sheppard.

 

The published material included grotesque images of murdered Jews alongside cartoons and articles ridiculing ethnic groups.

 

Their right-wing output was based on the writings of other extremists like American Nazi George Lincoln Rockwell.

 

Judge Rodney Grant told the pair their material was "abusive and insulting" and had the potential to cause "grave social harm".

 

Judge Grant said the offences were "unpleasant and very serious".

 

He added: "Such offences as these have, by their very nature, the potential to cause grave social harm, particularly in a society such as ours which has, for a number of years now, been multi-racial.

 

"These are serious offences. I can say without any hesitation that I have rarely seen, or had to read or consider, material which is so abusive and insulting ... towards racial groups within our own society."

 

The pair were convicted of a number of race-hate crimes which involved the possession, publication and distribution of racially inflammatory material.

 

They were convicted at Leeds Crown Court following two lengthy trials.

 

During the first trial in July last year, the pair skipped bail and fled to California, where they sought asylum, claiming they were being persecuted for their right-wing views.

 

They were deported back to the UK last month.

 

Today's sentence included a four-month term for skipping bail after the judge said they had "in effect just run away to avoid the consequences of your actions".

 

The court was told that the investigation into the men began when a complaint about a leaflet called Tales Of The Holohoax was reported to the police in 2004 after it was pushed through the door of a synagogue in Blackpool.

 

It was traced back to a post office box in Hull, registered to Sheppard.

 

Police later found a website featuring racially inflammatory material.

 

Prosecutors said one leaflet found by officers suggested that Auschwitz was a holiday camp for Jews provided by the Nazis.

 

Prosecuting, Jonathan Sandiford, said: "The general theme of the article was that Auschwitz-Birkenau was in fact a holiday camp provided by the Nazi regime.

 

"Jews from all over Europe came to enjoy a free holiday. A constant theme was the Jewish people had made up the story of the Holocaust as a slur on the German people."

 

Referring to an article by Whittle, the prosecutor added: "He returned to what appears to be a favourite theme: the notion that black people are not as equal as whites. They are sex-crazed, blood-thirsty savages.

 

"Black people were caricatured as uncivilised primitive savages portrayed as nothing more than murderers and rapists."

 

Sheppard, who has a previous race-hate conviction, of Brook Street, Selby, North Yorkshire, was found guilty of 16 offences and Whittle, of Avenham Lane, Preston, Lancashire, was found guilty of five offences.

 

The defendants' trials raised questions over the limits of free speech in the UK, as the pair claimed they should be acquitted because the articles were posted on a server registered in the US, beyond the reach of UK law.

 

Mitigating, Adrian Davidson, for Sheppard, said his client came from a "very troubled background" and revealed that his mother had committed suicide.

 

He said he had problems with authority, and in particular the police.

 

He said that, despite his troubled past, he was an intelligent man who had managed to obtain a degree in maths.

 

His client believed he was involved in a lawful activity as the articles were published on a US server, he told the court.

 

The barrister said much of the information was still widely accessible on other sites.

 

Linda Turnbull, for Whittle, said her client was shocked at the nature of the articles he had written. "They are nasty and unacceptable," she told the court.

 

She said her client had no intention of re-offending in the future.

 

Adil Khan, head of diversity and community cohesion at Humberside Police, said: "This case is groundbreaking.

 

"Previously material published on the internet has been argued to have been published by internet servers located outside the UK.

 

"In this case the publication was judged to have occurred when Sheppard and Whittle themselves uploaded the information.

 

"This has been a very long journey - one which has been complex and complicated.

 

"It has involved Humberside Police along with our colleagues from other forces.

 

"Inciting racial hatred is a crime and one which seems to occur too regularly. This kind of material will not be tolerated as this lengthy investigation shows.

 

"The sentence today reflects the seriousness of the offences.

 

"We are very proud of our officers and the people who gave evidence. We would like to praise the strength of the victims throughout this lengthy process.

 

"Sheppard and Whittle took measures to avoid the inevitable by absconding to America. They have now been returned to this country to face justice.

 

"Anyone who has been affected by the trial or the material is urged to contact Humberside Police Diversity Unit on 0845 60 60 222.

 

"Anyone who receives copies of such material or who comes across any on the internet they are advised to contact police either by telephone or by visiting a neighbourhood policing team."

 

What do you think of these two Leazes?

[Gejon 2]

Pair jailed for race-hate crimes

 

By Alistair Keely, Press Association

 

Friday, 10 July 2009

 

 

Two men were jailed today for inciting racial hatred online.

 

Simon Sheppard, 52, was sentenced to four years and 10 months while Stephen Whittle, 42, was given a term of two years and four months after being convicted of a number of race-hate crimes.

 

 

Leeds Crown Court was told that Whittle wrote offensive articles which were then published on the internet by Sheppard.

 

The published material included grotesque images of murdered Jews alongside cartoons and articles ridiculing ethnic groups.

 

Their right-wing output was based on the writings of other extremists like American Nazi George Lincoln Rockwell.

 

Judge Rodney Grant told the pair their material was "abusive and insulting" and had the potential to cause "grave social harm".

 

Judge Grant said the offences were "unpleasant and very serious".

 

He added: "Such offences as these have, by their very nature, the potential to cause grave social harm, particularly in a society such as ours which has, for a number of years now, been multi-racial.

 

"These are serious offences. I can say without any hesitation that I have rarely seen, or had to read or consider, material which is so abusive and insulting ... towards racial groups within our own society."

 

The pair were convicted of a number of race-hate crimes which involved the possession, publication and distribution of racially inflammatory material.

 

They were convicted at Leeds Crown Court following two lengthy trials.

 

During the first trial in July last year, the pair skipped bail and fled to California, where they sought asylum, claiming they were being persecuted for their right-wing views.

 

They were deported back to the UK last month.

 

Today's sentence included a four-month term for skipping bail after the judge said they had "in effect just run away to avoid the consequences of your actions".

 

The court was told that the investigation into the men began when a complaint about a leaflet called Tales Of The Holohoax was reported to the police in 2004 after it was pushed through the door of a synagogue in Blackpool.

 

It was traced back to a post office box in Hull, registered to Sheppard.

 

Police later found a website featuring racially inflammatory material.

 

Prosecutors said one leaflet found by officers suggested that Auschwitz was a holiday camp for Jews provided by the Nazis.

 

Prosecuting, Jonathan Sandiford, said: "The general theme of the article was that Auschwitz-Birkenau was in fact a holiday camp provided by the Nazi regime.

 

"Jews from all over Europe came to enjoy a free holiday. A constant theme was the Jewish people had made up the story of the Holocaust as a slur on the German people."

 

Referring to an article by Whittle, the prosecutor added: "He returned to what appears to be a favourite theme: the notion that black people are not as equal as whites. They are sex-crazed, blood-thirsty savages.

 

"Black people were caricatured as uncivilised primitive savages portrayed as nothing more than murderers and rapists."

 

Sheppard, who has a previous race-hate conviction, of Brook Street, Selby, North Yorkshire, was found guilty of 16 offences and Whittle, of Avenham Lane, Preston, Lancashire, was found guilty of five offences.

 

The defendants' trials raised questions over the limits of free speech in the UK, as the pair claimed they should be acquitted because the articles were posted on a server registered in the US, beyond the reach of UK law.

 

Mitigating, Adrian Davidson, for Sheppard, said his client came from a "very troubled background" and revealed that his mother had committed suicide.

 

He said he had problems with authority, and in particular the police.

 

He said that, despite his troubled past, he was an intelligent man who had managed to obtain a degree in maths.

 

His client believed he was involved in a lawful activity as the articles were published on a US server, he told the court.

 

The barrister said much of the information was still widely accessible on other sites.

 

Linda Turnbull, for Whittle, said her client was shocked at the nature of the articles he had written. "They are nasty and unacceptable," she told the court.

 

She said her client had no intention of re-offending in the future.

 

Adil Khan, head of diversity and community cohesion at Humberside Police, said: "This case is groundbreaking.

 

"Previously material published on the internet has been argued to have been published by internet servers located outside the UK.

 

"In this case the publication was judged to have occurred when Sheppard and Whittle themselves uploaded the information.

 

"This has been a very long journey - one which has been complex and complicated.

 

"It has involved Humberside Police along with our colleagues from other forces.

 

"Inciting racial hatred is a crime and one which seems to occur too regularly. This kind of material will not be tolerated as this lengthy investigation shows.

 

"The sentence today reflects the seriousness of the offences.

 

"We are very proud of our officers and the people who gave evidence. We would like to praise the strength of the victims throughout this lengthy process.

 

"Sheppard and Whittle took measures to avoid the inevitable by absconding to America. They have now been returned to this country to face justice.

 

"Anyone who has been affected by the trial or the material is urged to contact Humberside Police Diversity Unit on 0845 60 60 222.

 

"Anyone who receives copies of such material or who comes across any on the internet they are advised to contact police either by telephone or by visiting a neighbourhood policing team."

 

What do you think of these two Leazes?

 

Related to one of them isn't he?

[adios 717]

I think it was another chance for you to brand all asylum seekers as scum.

he wants to be seeking an asylum himself tbqfh

 

pics of LeazesDaughter btw LM? or do I not really see the result of several generations of incest?

[manc-mag 1]

Oh Jesus. It's about to go off.

[adios 717]

Oh Jesus. It's about to go off.

obsessed

[LeazesMag 0]

Pair jailed for race-hate crimes

 

By Alistair Keely, Press Association

 

Friday, 10 July 2009

 

 

Two men were jailed today for inciting racial hatred online.

 

Simon Sheppard, 52, was sentenced to four years and 10 months while Stephen Whittle, 42, was given a term of two years and four months after being convicted of a number of race-hate crimes.

 

 

Leeds Crown Court was told that Whittle wrote offensive articles which were then published on the internet by Sheppard.

 

The published material included grotesque images of murdered Jews alongside cartoons and articles ridiculing ethnic groups.

 

Their right-wing output was based on the writings of other extremists like American Nazi George Lincoln Rockwell.

 

Judge Rodney Grant told the pair their material was "abusive and insulting" and had the potential to cause "grave social harm".

 

Judge Grant said the offences were "unpleasant and very serious".

 

He added: "Such offences as these have, by their very nature, the potential to cause grave social harm, particularly in a society such as ours which has, for a number of years now, been multi-racial.

 

"These are serious offences. I can say without any hesitation that I have rarely seen, or had to read or consider, material which is so abusive and insulting ... towards racial groups within our own society."

 

The pair were convicted of a number of race-hate crimes which involved the possession, publication and distribution of racially inflammatory material.

 

They were convicted at Leeds Crown Court following two lengthy trials.

 

During the first trial in July last year, the pair skipped bail and fled to California, where they sought asylum, claiming they were being persecuted for their right-wing views.

 

They were deported back to the UK last month.

 

Today's sentence included a four-month term for skipping bail after the judge said they had "in effect just run away to avoid the consequences of your actions".

 

The court was told that the investigation into the men began when a complaint about a leaflet called Tales Of The Holohoax was reported to the police in 2004 after it was pushed through the door of a synagogue in Blackpool.

 

It was traced back to a post office box in Hull, registered to Sheppard.

 

Police later found a website featuring racially inflammatory material.

 

Prosecutors said one leaflet found by officers suggested that Auschwitz was a holiday camp for Jews provided by the Nazis.

 

Prosecuting, Jonathan Sandiford, said: "The general theme of the article was that Auschwitz-Birkenau was in fact a holiday camp provided by the Nazi regime.

 

"Jews from all over Europe came to enjoy a free holiday. A constant theme was the Jewish people had made up the story of the Holocaust as a slur on the German people."

 

Referring to an article by Whittle, the prosecutor added: "He returned to what appears to be a favourite theme: the notion that black people are not as equal as whites. They are sex-crazed, blood-thirsty savages.

 

"Black people were caricatured as uncivilised primitive savages portrayed as nothing more than murderers and rapists."

 

Sheppard, who has a previous race-hate conviction, of Brook Street, Selby, North Yorkshire, was found guilty of 16 offences and Whittle, of Avenham Lane, Preston, Lancashire, was found guilty of five offences.

 

The defendants' trials raised questions over the limits of free speech in the UK, as the pair claimed they should be acquitted because the articles were posted on a server registered in the US, beyond the reach of UK law.

 

Mitigating, Adrian Davidson, for Sheppard, said his client came from a "very troubled background" and revealed that his mother had committed suicide.

 

He said he had problems with authority, and in particular the police.

 

He said that, despite his troubled past, he was an intelligent man who had managed to obtain a degree in maths.

 

His client believed he was involved in a lawful activity as the articles were published on a US server, he told the court.

 

The barrister said much of the information was still widely accessible on other sites.

 

Linda Turnbull, for Whittle, said her client was shocked at the nature of the articles he had written. "They are nasty and unacceptable," she told the court.

 

She said her client had no intention of re-offending in the future.

 

Adil Khan, head of diversity and community cohesion at Humberside Police, said: "This case is groundbreaking.

 

"Previously material published on the internet has been argued to have been published by internet servers located outside the UK.

 

"In this case the publication was judged to have occurred when Sheppard and Whittle themselves uploaded the information.

 

"This has been a very long journey - one which has been complex and complicated.

 

"It has involved Humberside Police along with our colleagues from other forces.

 

"Inciting racial hatred is a crime and one which seems to occur too regularly. This kind of material will not be tolerated as this lengthy investigation shows.

 

"The sentence today reflects the seriousness of the offences.

 

"We are very proud of our officers and the people who gave evidence. We would like to praise the strength of the victims throughout this lengthy process.

 

"Sheppard and Whittle took measures to avoid the inevitable by absconding to America. They have now been returned to this country to face justice.

 

"Anyone who has been affected by the trial or the material is urged to contact Humberside Police Diversity Unit on 0845 60 60 222.

 

"Anyone who receives copies of such material or who comes across any on the internet they are advised to contact police either by telephone or by visiting a neighbourhood policing team."

 

What do you think of these two Leazes?

 

Lets hope they bang up every muslim who heckles our troops or burns British flags on British soil then.

 

Somehow, I doubt that will happen though. Do you agree ?

Edited December 16, 2010 by LeazesMag

[Gejon 2]

So you just dismiss it and turn it on the Muslims?

[Mr Lahey 0]

:lol: :D

[Mac-Toon 1]

I'm canny new on here but can someone direct me to this Souness thread, it must be fucking dynamite. 5 year down the line and he's still causing waves.

 

Has someone made an outrageous statement at some point?

Edited December 16, 2010 by Mac-Toon

[The Fish 10764]

Lets hope they bang up every muslim who heckles our troops or burns British flags on British soil then.

 

Somehow, I doubt that will happen though. Do you agree ?

 

I want you to quote ANY part of my post that is relevant to your reply.

 

And I want you to answer the question I asked, or admit your hypocrisy.

 

OR

 

Shut up.

[adios 717]

Prosecutors said one leaflet found by officers suggested that Auschwitz was a holiday camp for Jews provided by the Nazis.

 

jfc

 

can I have a link for that article please fish, want to link it to a couple jewish mates. hopefully not going to jail for it.

[The Fish 10764]

Prosecutors said one leaflet found by officers suggested that Auschwitz was a holiday camp for Jews provided by the Nazis.

 

jfc

 

can I have a link for that article please fish, want to link it to a couple jewish mates. hopefully not going to jail for it.

 

Kosher Clicky

 

This counts as a mitzvah, just so y'know

[adios 717]

cheers, I assume that mean I owe you some black pudding or something

[Gejon 2]

Has Leazes stepped away from this thread now someone has posted an example of two British people being racist and he is being asked if he condones it?

[Meenzer 15416]

He's gone to the pub.

[The Fish 10764]

cheers, I assume that mean I owe you some black pudding or something

 

A Cheese and Bacon Burger on a Saturday would be fine.

[Gejon 2]

He's gone to the pub.

 

EDL darts night?

Edited December 16, 2010 by Gejon

[LeazesMag 0]

Lets hope they bang up every muslim who heckles our troops or burns British flags on British soil then.

 

Somehow, I doubt that will happen though. Do you agree ?

 

I want you to quote ANY part of my post that is relevant to your reply.

 

And I want you to answer the question I asked, or admit your hypocrisy.

 

OR

 

Shut up.

 

your showing me a news article, and for some reason it is highlighting racist behaviour by white guys ? So I'm saying doesn't racist behaviour by others come into the same category ? If you accept this, why don't you agree with me when I highlight these incidents ? Especially when they occur on British soil, and its the people who are not observing traditional British values and cultures who are always given the preferential viewpoint ?

 

I've no argument with your article by the way, just wonder why people on here jump on the anti-west bandwagon so often.

[Mac-Toon 1]

He's gone to the pub.

 

EDL darts night?

[LeazesMag 0]

He's gone to the pub.

 

why don't you go to the pub ?

 

Whats wrong with going to the pub ?

 

Does everybody on here play with their DS's and Nintendos or whatever ?

[LeazesMag 0]

cheers, I assume that mean I owe you some black pudding or something

 

careful. Some thick fucker like to dumb might pick you up for that.

 

"pigs" how old are you again ?

[Gejon 2]

He's gone to the pub.

 

why don't you go to the pub ?

 

Whats wrong with going to the pub ?

 

Does everybody on here play with their DS's and Nintendos or whatever ?

 

A DS is a Nintendo