LeazesMag 0 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 I see a lot of s in this thread. Well you wouldn't be ing if you were ran over by an asylum seeker and left with mush for brains. Is that what happened to Leazes. That would explain his stance on literally everything. I'd go for a lemonade if I were you, and study your guide to basic accountancy and sustainability while you're at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 I see a lot of s in this thread. Well you wouldn't be ing if you were ran over by an asylum seeker and left with mush for brains. I suppose you're one of those educated types with your smart comments I suppose you're an overgrown hippie ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 I see a lot of s in this thread. Well you wouldn't be ing if you were ran over by an asylum seeker and left with mush for brains. I don't think I'd be happy if I was ran over by anyone regardless of them being an asylum seeker. Firstly I'd ask why I didn't look left, look right, look left again. Nothing like a bit of casual racism on a thursday afternoon. fucking Christ. What an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 I heard from a man down the pub all those lefty do-gooder namby pamby students ever do is get stoned to death on the hashbong. anyway, let's get this thread back on topic, anyone looking forward to the january sales? you don't need to go to the pub, you can sit drinking your lemonade and read the link I've provided. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 reading Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tooner 243 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 oh God. The mackem of North America is here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 reading which clearly has not been of much benefit to you. Try travelling a bit instead I see you don't answer the "pigs" comment ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac-Toon 1 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 I don't disagree with the fact he should be deported and it's a fucking disgrace he's been granted asylum. Would that include any immigrant / asylum seeker who breaks the law should be sent back? Or just in the case of this bastard? Like I say he should be sent back, 7 years on from the incident but that's down to our country being a soft touch. So, is this thread aimed at the government asking when we'll stop being soft fannys, because if that's the case then the answer will be never. We're not like France or Australia who are proud of their identity, we'll just let anyone in. (or so it seems) You love an arguement, like Leazes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44554 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 I see a lot of s in this thread. Well you wouldn't be ing if you were ran over by an asylum seeker and left with mush for brains. Is that what happened to Leazes. That would explain his stance on literally everything. I'd go for a lemonade if I were you, and study your guide to basic accountancy and sustainability while you're at it. Fruit loop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 I don't disagree with the fact he should be deported and it's a fucking disgrace he's been granted asylum. Would that include any immigrant / asylum seeker who breaks the law should be sent back? Or just in the case of this bastard? Like I say he should be sent back, 7 years on from the incident but that's down to our country being a soft touch. So, is this thread aimed at the government asking when we'll stop being soft fannys, because if that's the case then the answer will be never. We're not like France or Australia who are proud of their identity, we'll just let anyone in. (or so it seems) You love an arguement, like Leazes. ah, sensible reply. No, I don't like an argument, it's simply that some people on here are fuckwits This particular immigrant should certainly be sent back, or preferably strung up from the River Tyne with a brick tied to his bollocks.... All immigrants who should not be here should be sent back to where they came from, but they should never have got here in the first place which goes without saying. Sadly, there are people who think we are the hotel of the world and more sadly again, the rest of the europe are happy for us to be precisely that. We are fucking mugs, while the leftie brigade say "we can't send them back there". What namby pamby crap. Terrorists ? Shoot the fuckers. There would be plenty of volunteers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 reading which clearly has not been of much benefit to you. Try travelling a bit instead I see you don't answer the "pigs" comment ..... I didn't bother spending time on you for a serious argument because you implied that all education should be the subject of derision, you fucking simpleton I have friends who range from pretty far left, to pretty far right, small government, big government, across continents, people who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan, and you wouldn't last 5 minutes in an argument with a single one. If I wanted to waste time on someone like you, I'd volunteer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 I don't disagree with the fact he should be deported and it's a fucking disgrace he's been granted asylum. Would that include any immigrant / asylum seeker who breaks the law should be sent back? Or just in the case of this bastard? Like I say he should be sent back, 7 years on from the incident but that's down to our country being a soft touch. So, is this thread aimed at the government asking when we'll stop being soft fannys, because if that's the case then the answer will be never. We're not like France or Australia who are proud of their identity, we'll just let anyone in. (or so it seems) You love an arguement, like Leazes. try to keep things on topic please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 I see a lot of s in this thread. Well you wouldn't be ing if you were ran over by an asylum seeker and left with mush for brains. Is that what happened to Leazes. That would explain his stance on literally everything. I'd go for a lemonade if I were you, and study your guide to basic accountancy and sustainability while you're at it. Fruit loop. Is that so ? Explain why you encouraged the football club to supply unsustainable funds to a dead duck failing manager ? As it's your chosen profession, and you say you're an expert in this field, I'm waiting, and I'm interested ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 (edited) reading which clearly has not been of much benefit to you. Try travelling a bit instead I see you don't answer the "pigs" comment ..... I didn't bother spending time on you for a serious argument because you implied that all education should be the subject of derision, you fucking simpleton I have friends who range from pretty far left, to pretty far right, small government, big government, across continents, people who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan, and you wouldn't last 5 minutes in an argument with a single one. If I wanted to waste time on someone like you, I'd volunteer. is that so ? Shame you either don't listen to a word they tell you, or they are as nutty as you. "Pigs". Edited December 16, 2010 by LeazesMag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 which ones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 I don't disagree with the fact he should be deported and it's a fucking disgrace he's been granted asylum. Would that include any immigrant / asylum seeker who breaks the law should be sent back? Or just in the case of this bastard? Like I say he should be sent back, 7 years on from the incident but that's down to our country being a soft touch. So, is this thread aimed at the government asking when we'll stop being soft fannys, because if that's the case then the answer will be never. We're not like France or Australia who are proud of their identity, we'll just let anyone in. (or so it seems) You love an arguement, like Leazes. try to keep things on topic please this IS the subject, which I started. Fuckin Dumbo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44554 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 I see a lot of s in this thread. Well you wouldn't be ing if you were ran over by an asylum seeker and left with mush for brains. Is that what happened to Leazes. That would explain his stance on literally everything. I'd go for a lemonade if I were you, and study your guide to basic accountancy and sustainability while you're at it. Fruit loop. Is that so ? Explain why you encouraged the football club to supply unsustainable funds to a dead duck failing manager ? As it's your chosen profession, and you say you're an expert in this field, I'm waiting, and I'm interested ? Fucking mental. What is your chosen area of expertise? You construct ridiculous arguments, attribute them to other people, and then effectively have an argument with yourself. And you still manage to tie yourself in knots. What a flid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 I see a lot of s in this thread. Well you wouldn't be ing if you were ran over by an asylum seeker and left with mush for brains. Is that what happened to Leazes. That would explain his stance on literally everything. I'd go for a lemonade if I were you, and study your guide to basic accountancy and sustainability while you're at it. Fruit loop. Is that so ? Explain why you encouraged the football club to supply unsustainable funds to a dead duck failing manager ? As it's your chosen profession, and you say you're an expert in this field, I'm waiting, and I'm interested ? Fucking mental. What is your chosen area of expertise? You construct ridiculous arguments, attribute them to other people, and then effectively have an argument with yourself. And you still manage to tie yourself in knots. What a flid. So you aren't going to explain why you encouraged such unsustainability ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44554 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 I see a lot of s in this thread. Well you wouldn't be ing if you were ran over by an asylum seeker and left with mush for brains. Is that what happened to Leazes. That would explain his stance on literally everything. I'd go for a lemonade if I were you, and study your guide to basic accountancy and sustainability while you're at it. Fruit loop. Is that so ? Explain why you encouraged the football club to supply unsustainable funds to a dead duck failing manager ? As it's your chosen profession, and you say you're an expert in this field, I'm waiting, and I'm interested ? Fucking mental. What is your chosen area of expertise? You construct ridiculous arguments, attribute them to other people, and then effectively have an argument with yourself. And you still manage to tie yourself in knots. What a flid. So you aren't going to explain why you encouraged such unsustainability ? I didn't. You have attributed that position to me, then tied yourself in knots by claiming it was ridiculous behavior whilst simultaneously defending Shepherd and arguing that a chairman should always back his manager. You're all over the place, you thick twat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 What is your chosen area of expertise? You construct ridiculous arguments, attribute them to other people, and then effectively have an argument with yourself. And you still manage to tie yourself in knots. What a flid. I think he's a travel agent, at least I think he was trying to sell me a holiday earlier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 I see a lot of s in this thread. Well you wouldn't be ing if you were ran over by an asylum seeker and left with mush for brains. Is that what happened to Leazes. That would explain his stance on literally everything. I'd go for a lemonade if I were you, and study your guide to basic accountancy and sustainability while you're at it. Fruit loop. Is that so ? Explain why you encouraged the football club to supply unsustainable funds to a dead duck failing manager ? As it's your chosen profession, and you say you're an expert in this field, I'm waiting, and I'm interested ? Fucking mental. What is your chosen area of expertise? You construct ridiculous arguments, attribute them to other people, and then effectively have an argument with yourself. And you still manage to tie yourself in knots. What a flid. So you aren't going to explain why you encouraged such unsustainability ? I didn't. You have attributed that position to me, then tied yourself in knots by claiming it was ridiculous behavior whilst simultaneously defending Shepherd and arguing that a chairman should always back his manager. You're all over the place, you thick twat. I said they should sack Souness long before they did. You supported him and said they should back him to build his own team right to the end. You supported the sales of Bellamy and Robert for peanuts, such is your understanding of "unsustainability" Strange for someone who proclaims himself to be an expert in this field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 (edited) What is your chosen area of expertise? You construct ridiculous arguments, attribute them to other people, and then effectively have an argument with yourself. And you still manage to tie yourself in knots. What a flid. I think he's a travel agent, at least I think he was trying to sell me a holiday earlier no constructive comment then dumbo ? "Pigs" Edited December 16, 2010 by LeazesMag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted December 16, 2010 Author Share Posted December 16, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now