Gemmill 44554 Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 so what's your fascination with Gemmill ? I don't want his bottom, if that helps at all. Such a liar! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 18, 2010 Author Share Posted November 18, 2010 I think someone should just lock this thread. +1 The amount of petty squabbles Leazes gets into is unbelievable. Lets see now. I started this thread with some genuine info, admittedly for the do gooders and namby pamby's to think about [some hope ] and I'm asked to name the company ? So who's making a squabble ????????? I'll leave it there. If people don't want to believe it, then it's their prerogative. Shame they have to resort to name calling instead though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 18, 2010 Author Share Posted November 18, 2010 so what's your fascination with Gemmill ? I don't want his bottom, if that helps at all. What's yours ? What about mine? You said I had pretty eyes. I'd have to have a grope first. Trent Posse initiation ritual. Scary stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 Poll. Gem vs Leazes on stupidness, loser doesn't try and make a Newcastle online account for a full month Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 Loser to renege on said promise within a week Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 18, 2010 Author Share Posted November 18, 2010 56, you know. your point is what exactly ? All you have to do - is answer the posts instead of trotting out crap and clipping what doesn't suit you. How old are you ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15464 Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 so what's your fascination with Gemmill ? I don't want his bottom, if that helps at all. What's yours ? What about mine? You said I had pretty eyes. I'd have to have a grope first. Trent Posse initiation ritual. Scary stuff You should try it some time. Broaden your life experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 Loser to renege on said promise within a week Sooner than that tbh, spongebob will probably do the same when our own poll ends! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 18, 2010 Author Share Posted November 18, 2010 I don't know whether it's just the natural way of things on this forum but I'd swear Leazes is now filling the mong vacuum created by Fop's departure. There seems to have been a steady and irreversible movement towards it all year now. ah. Really ? Can you find something in particular that shows where I have been wrong about something and the "majority" [which is what you are referring to] have been right - or is a "mong" just someone who disagrees with you ? It's not so long ago, that YOU were whining on about those awful mancs hurting your feelings thanks to the Halls and Shepherd etc etc. What sort of mong gets upset about bollocks like that ? Oh dear. I'm happy enough with my views mate, just as I was regarding the Halls and Shepherd when most people disagreed with me too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 (edited) 56, you know. your point is what exactly ? All you have to do - is answer the posts instead of trotting out crap and clipping what doesn't suit you. How old are you ? Clipping a post is worse than ignoring one completely then? Why didn't you respond in the Blackburn thread? Because you got shown up. The best laugh is, that didnt even stop you from bringing the same flawed arguments to another thread. Reply in it or hypocrit Edited November 18, 2010 by AshleysSkidMark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 18, 2010 Author Share Posted November 18, 2010 so what's your fascination with Gemmill ? I don't want his bottom, if that helps at all. What's yours ? What about mine? You said I had pretty eyes. I'd have to have a grope first. Trent Posse initiation ritual. Scary stuff You should try it some time. Broaden your life experience. no thanks. That's an "experience" I've no great desire to try out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 18, 2010 Author Share Posted November 18, 2010 56, you know. your point is what exactly ? All you have to do - is answer the posts instead of trotting out crap and clipping what doesn't suit you. How old are you ? Clipping a post is worse than ignoring one completely then? Why didn't you respond in the Blackburn thread? Because you got shown up. The best laugh is, that did even stop you from bringing the same flawed arguments to another thread. Reply in it or hypocrit isn't that poll finished yet ? What do you think about your man Ashley now that our little purple patch is over ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 Leazes, what exactly are you implying when you say you 'can't name the company'? If you're implying that a libel action will ensue, the legal defence to that is that what you've said is 'fair comment'. Ie it has it's basis in fact. So provided you're confident your source is reliable and not a bullshitter, your worries would be unfounded. If you're not confident however then you're probably quite right to keep doing exactly what you're doing now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 56, you know. your point is what exactly ? All you have to do - is answer the posts instead of trotting out crap and clipping what doesn't suit you. How old are you ? Clipping a post is worse than ignoring one completely then? Why didn't you respond in the Blackburn thread? Because you got shown up. The best laugh is, that did even stop you from bringing the same flawed arguments to another thread. Reply in it or hypocrit isn't that poll finished yet ? What do you think about your man Ashley now that our little purple patch is over ? Respond to the post leazes, hypocrit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 18, 2010 Author Share Posted November 18, 2010 Leazes, what exactly are you implying when you say you 'can't name the company'? If you're implying that a libel action will ensue, the legal defence to that is that what you've said is 'fair comment'. Ie it has it's basis in fact. So provided you're confident your source is reliable and not a bullshitter, your worries would be unfounded. If you're not confident however then you're probably quite right to keep doing exactly what you're doing now. I'm confident enough that releasing the information could drop someone in the shit, to be blunt about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 18, 2010 Author Share Posted November 18, 2010 56, you know. your point is what exactly ? All you have to do - is answer the posts instead of trotting out crap and clipping what doesn't suit you. How old are you ? Clipping a post is worse than ignoring one completely then? Why didn't you respond in the Blackburn thread? Because you got shown up. The best laugh is, that did even stop you from bringing the same flawed arguments to another thread. Reply in it or hypocrit isn't that poll finished yet ? What do you think about your man Ashley now that our little purple patch is over ? Respond to the post leazes, hypocrit What are you going to do when your man Ashley sells out soon ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 Leazes, what exactly are you implying when you say you 'can't name the company'? If you're implying that a libel action will ensue, the legal defence to that is that what you've said is 'fair comment'. Ie it has it's basis in fact. So provided you're confident your source is reliable and not a bullshitter, your worries would be unfounded. If you're not confident however then you're probably quite right to keep doing exactly what you're doing now. I'm confident enough that releasing the information could drop someone in the shit, to be blunt about it. In the same shit that you throw at your cell wall, you big freak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 18, 2010 Author Share Posted November 18, 2010 Leazes, what exactly are you implying when you say you 'can't name the company'? If you're implying that a libel action will ensue, the legal defence to that is that what you've said is 'fair comment'. Ie it has it's basis in fact. So provided you're confident your source is reliable and not a bullshitter, your worries would be unfounded. If you're not confident however then you're probably quite right to keep doing exactly what you're doing now. I'm confident enough that releasing the information could drop someone in the shit, to be blunt about it. In the same shit that you throw at your cell wall, you big freak. awwwww....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 56, you know. your point is what exactly ? All you have to do - is answer the posts instead of trotting out crap and clipping what doesn't suit you. How old are you ? Clipping a post is worse than ignoring one completely then? Why didn't you respond in the Blackburn thread? Because you got shown up. The best laugh is, that did even stop you from bringing the same flawed arguments to another thread. Reply in it or hypocrit isn't that poll finished yet ? What do you think about your man Ashley now that our little purple patch is over ? Respond to the post leazes, hypocrit What are you going to do when your man Ashley sells out soon ? and there's gemmills response to not answering posts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 18, 2010 Author Share Posted November 18, 2010 56, you know. your point is what exactly ? All you have to do - is answer the posts instead of trotting out crap and clipping what doesn't suit you. How old are you ? Clipping a post is worse than ignoring one completely then? Why didn't you respond in the Blackburn thread? Because you got shown up. The best laugh is, that did even stop you from bringing the same flawed arguments to another thread. Reply in it or hypocrit isn't that poll finished yet ? What do you think about your man Ashley now that our little purple patch is over ? Respond to the post leazes, hypocrit What are you going to do when your man Ashley sells out soon ? and there's gemmills response to not answering posts one day you might make some sense. What name are you going to come back as ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 I don't know whether it's just the natural way of things on this forum but I'd swear Leazes is now filling the mong vacuum created by Fop's departure. There seems to have been a steady and irreversible movement towards it all year now. ah. Really ? Can you find something in particular that shows where I have been wrong about something and the "majority" [which is what you are referring to] have been right - or is a "mong" just someone who disagrees with you ? It's not so long ago, that YOU were whining on about those awful mancs hurting your feelings thanks to the Halls and Shepherd etc etc. What sort of mong gets upset about bollocks like that ? Oh dear. I'm happy enough with my views mate, just as I was regarding the Halls and Shepherd when most people disagreed with me too. By 'mong' I mean someone who ignores (or is incapable of grasping) basic logic and who has become a sad parody of themselves in the process. I'm all too aware you're quite 'happy enough with your views'. The whole forum is aware. You're also happy enough never managing to justify them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 (edited) A man in meltdown, ladies and gentlemen Edited November 18, 2010 by AshleysSkidMark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 18, 2010 Author Share Posted November 18, 2010 I don't know whether it's just the natural way of things on this forum but I'd swear Leazes is now filling the mong vacuum created by Fop's departure. There seems to have been a steady and irreversible movement towards it all year now. ah. Really ? Can you find something in particular that shows where I have been wrong about something and the "majority" [which is what you are referring to] have been right - or is a "mong" just someone who disagrees with you ? It's not so long ago, that YOU were whining on about those awful mancs hurting your feelings thanks to the Halls and Shepherd etc etc. What sort of mong gets upset about bollocks like that ? Oh dear. I'm happy enough with my views mate, just as I was regarding the Halls and Shepherd when most people disagreed with me too. By 'mong' I mean someone who ignores (or is incapable of grasping) basic logic and who has become a sad parody of themselves in the process. I'm all too aware you're quite 'happy enough with your views'. The whole forum is aware. You're also happy enough never managing to justify them. my views which I posted for a long time regarding the Halls and Shepherd are well justified now, and undisputably correct. Only a few people who disagreed with me have been able to admit this is so. Who's the "mongs" then ? My views about muslims, immigration etc - I take it this is what you refer to because this is the major topic where the majority disagree with me - will obviously take a long time to come to fruition, if that's the correct phrase to use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 This has been on the cards for some time. It comes down to people like peasepud and Alex defending him in board discussions. Shooting him down could have helped nip the in the bud. Look what you've done to him. Look what you've fucking done to him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 32875 Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 Does anyone think it would be a good idea if Leazes and ASM just put each other on 'ignore'? Please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now