Rob W 0 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 About time too - 6 years since the courts said it was illegal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 Muslim suicide bombers allowed to vote? This country! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin S. Assilleekunt 1 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/nov/02/s...attacker-guilty I wonder who she'll be voting for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/nov/02/s...attacker-guilty I wonder who she'll be voting for. She'll like the BNP's non-interventionist foreign policy...but not their "send the bugger's back" policy. Tough one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin S. Assilleekunt 1 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 The BNP actually pledged to pay all immigrants to move back to their countries of origin so that may swing it for her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac-Toon 1 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 The BNP actually pledged to pay all immigrants to move back to their countries of origin so that may swing it for her. ....and in the process fuck the whole population of Britain by taxes having to pay for it. Their policies are about as stringent as sunderlands defensive policies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 The BNP actually pledged to pay all immigrants to move back to their countries of origin so that may swing it for her. ....and in the process fuck the whole population of Britain by taxes having to pay for it. So, what IS the population of the UK these days, compared to 30 years ago, and who thinks we can continue to pay for the social services, higher unemployment, housing, and everything it entails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 NHS would collapse if we sent the buggers back tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted November 2, 2010 Author Share Posted November 2, 2010 and the cleaners, and the restaurant workers, and the PL footballers................................ think of the impact on the local Bentley dealer!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted November 2, 2010 Author Share Posted November 2, 2010 (edited) The BNP actually pledged to pay all immigrants to move back to their countries of origin so that may swing it for her. ....and in the process fuck the whole population of Britain by taxes having to pay for it. So, what IS the population of the UK these days, compared to 30 years ago, and who thinks we can continue to pay for the social services, higher unemployment, housing, and everything it entails. Population Timeline 1600 just over 4 million 1700 5 million 1801 8 million 1851 20 million 1901 40 million 1951 50 million 1998 57 million 2010 61 million you see the population exploded in Victorian times and hardly expanded at all postwar - aall them folks spending a tenner to go to Oztralia I guess If Victorian expansion had continued we'd have over 200 million people in the country now Edited November 2, 2010 by Rob W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac-Toon 1 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 The BNP actually pledged to pay all immigrants to move back to their countries of origin so that may swing it for her. ....and in the process fuck the whole population of Britain by taxes having to pay for it. So, what IS the population of the UK these days, compared to 30 years ago, and who thinks we can continue to pay for the social services, higher unemployment, housing, and everything it entails. Population's around 60 million, I believe. I'd sooner sent the crims elsewhere and keep other nationalities in the country. (Perhaps a few lare ships driftin aimlessly across the oceans of the world, full of criminals) It's the scummy 'radjeys' who give the country a bad name, not foreign nationals. ^^^ A sweeping generalisation if you've ever read one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted November 2, 2010 Author Share Posted November 2, 2010 latest estimate is 61.4 million Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sniffer 0 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 Aye, an estimate. That means fuck all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 Aye, an estimate. That means fuck all. exactly. At least 5 million more, unaccounted for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 (edited) instead of going into Iraq to get rid of Saddam, we should have just let them all into the UK, as is our duty. I'm sure we would cope, just think of the boost to multi-culturism. In fact, going back to the opening post, we should let these prisoners make their own way to the polling booths, I'm sure they can all be trusted, sensible people like they are undergoing their rehabilitation back into society, until they have "done their time". Edited November 2, 2010 by LeazesMag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 22424 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 Aye, an estimate. That means fuck all. exactly. At least 5 million more, unaccounted for Is that an estimate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Castell 0 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 The BNP actually pledged to pay all immigrants to move back to their countries of origin so that may swing it for her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Aye, an estimate. That means fuck all. exactly. At least 5 million more, unaccounted for Is that an estimate? how many do you estimate ? 200 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 22424 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Aye, an estimate. That means fuck all. exactly. At least 5 million more, unaccounted for Is that an estimate? how many do you estimate ? 200 ? Thought estimates meant fuck all? Probably more inclined to put my trust in professional estimates and census results rather than your vague guesses mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted November 3, 2010 Author Share Posted November 3, 2010 Aye, an estimate. That means fuck all. exactly. At least 5 million more, unaccounted for evidence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted November 3, 2010 Author Share Posted November 3, 2010 instead of going into Iraq to get rid of Saddam, we should have just let them all into the UK, as is our duty. I'm sure we would cope, just think of the boost to multi-culturism. In fact, going back to the opening post, we should let these prisoners make their own way to the polling booths, I'm sure they can all be trusted, sensible people like they are undergoing their rehabilitation back into society, until they have "done their time". could have done worse - Iraq had the best education system in the Arab world and a very high proportion of women in professional jobs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15870 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 instead of going into Iraq to get rid of Saddam, we should have just let them all into the UK, as is our duty. I'm sure we would cope, just think of the boost to multi-culturism. Who are "them"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted November 3, 2010 Author Share Posted November 3, 2010 instead of going into Iraq to get rid of Saddam, we should have just let them all into the UK, as is our duty. I'm sure we would cope, just think of the boost to multi-culturism. Who are "them"? the Americans??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/nov/02/s...attacker-guilty I wonder who she'll be voting for. Life with a minimum 15 years btw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 instead of going into Iraq to get rid of Saddam, we should have just let them all into the UK, as is our duty. I'm sure we would cope, just think of the boost to multi-culturism. In fact, going back to the opening post, we should let these prisoners make their own way to the polling booths, I'm sure they can all be trusted, sensible people like they are undergoing their rehabilitation back into society, until they have "done their time". could have done worse - Iraq had the best education system in the Arab world and a very high proportion of women in professional jobs so you're saying we should have just let them get on with rule by Saddam then ? The ironic thing is, if a plane blows up you will be the first to complain about security services not doing their jobs properly. Haven't I asked you if you are jealous of Civil Servants and their pensions etc ? Have you replied ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now